دورية أكاديمية
Research evaluation support services in biomedical libraries.
| العنوان: | Research evaluation support services in biomedical libraries. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Gutzman KE, Bales ME, Belter CW, Chambers T, Chan L, Holmes KL, Lu YL, Palmer LA, Reznik-Zellen RC, Sarli CC, Suiter AM, Wheeler TR |
| المصدر: | Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA [J Med Libr Assoc] 2018 Jan; Vol. 106 (1), pp. 1-14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jan 02. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Medical Library Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101132728 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1558-9439 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15365050 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Med Libr Assoc Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Chicago, IL : Medical Library Association, c2002- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Interdisciplinary Communication*, Biomedical Research/*organization & administration , Libraries, Medical/*organization & administration , Library Technical Services/*organization & administration, Canada ; Humans ; Librarians ; Library Services/organization & administration ; Library Surveys ; United States |
| مستخلص: | Objective: The paper provides a review of current practices related to evaluation support services reported by seven biomedical and research libraries. Methods: A group of seven libraries from the United States and Canada described their experiences with establishing evaluation support services at their libraries. A questionnaire was distributed among the libraries to elicit information as to program development, service and staffing models, campus partnerships, training, products such as tools and reports, and resources used for evaluation support services. The libraries also reported interesting projects, lessons learned, and future plans. Results: The seven libraries profiled in this paper report a variety of service models in providing evaluation support services to meet the needs of campus stakeholders. The service models range from research center cores, partnerships with research groups, and library programs with staff dedicated to evaluation support services. A variety of products and services were described such as an automated tool to develop rank-based metrics, consultation on appropriate metrics to use for evaluation, customized publication and citation reports, resource guides, classes and training, and others. Implementing these services has allowed the libraries to expand their roles on campus and to contribute more directly to the research missions of their institutions. Conclusions: Libraries can leverage a variety of evaluation support services as an opportunity to successfully meet an array of challenges confronting the biomedical research community, including robust efforts to report and demonstrate tangible and meaningful outcomes of biomedical research and clinical care. These services represent a transformative direction that can be emulated by other biomedical and research libraries. Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors have no conflict of interest. |
| References: | J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jan;98(1):17-23. (PMID: 20098647) Med Ref Serv Q. 2010 Apr;29(2):183-9. (PMID: 20432142) J Biomed Inform. 2014 Oct;51:8-14. (PMID: 24694772) |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20180118 Date Completed: 20180827 Latest Revision: 20220409 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC5764574 |
| DOI: | 10.5195/jmla.2018.205 |
| PMID: | 29339930 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1558-9439 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.5195/jmla.2018.205 |