دورية أكاديمية

Nutritional evaluation and ruminal fermentation patterns of kochia compared with alfalfa and orchardgrass hays and ephedra and cheatgrass compared with orchardgrass hay as alternative arid-land forages for beef cattle in two dual-flow continuous culture system experiments.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Nutritional evaluation and ruminal fermentation patterns of kochia compared with alfalfa and orchardgrass hays and ephedra and cheatgrass compared with orchardgrass hay as alternative arid-land forages for beef cattle in two dual-flow continuous culture system experiments.
المؤلفون: da Silva LG; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL., Sampaio CB; Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG Brazil., de Paula EM; Department of Agriculture, Nutrition, and Veterinary Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV., Shenkoru T; Department of Agriculture, Nutrition, and Veterinary Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV., Brandao VLN; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL., Dai X; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL., Perryman B; Department of Agriculture, Nutrition, and Veterinary Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV., Faciola AP; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
المصدر: Journal of animal science [J Anim Sci] 2018 Mar 06; Vol. 96 (2), pp. 705-714.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: American Society of Animal Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8003002 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1525-3163 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00218812 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Anim Sci Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Champaign, IL : American Society of Animal Science
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Cattle* , Chenopodiaceae*, Animal Feed/*analysis , Bioreactors/*veterinary , Medicago sativa/*chemistry , Poaceae/*chemistry, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Diet/veterinary ; Digestion ; Fermentation ; Rumen/metabolism
مستخلص: The objective was to evaluate the ruminal fermentation patterns of forage kochia (FK) compared with alfalfa hay (AH) and orchardgrass hay (OH) (Exp. 1), and ephedra (EPH) and immature cheatgrass (CG) compared with OH (Exp. 2), using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Two in vitro experiments were conducted, and in each experiment, treatments were randomly assigned to six dual-flow fermenters (1,223 ± 21 mL) in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design, with three consecutive periods of 10 d each, consisting of 7 d for diet adaptation and 3 d for sample collection. Each fermenter was fed a total of 72 g/d (DM basis) and treatments were as follows: Exp. 1: 1) 100% OH, 2) 100% AH, and 3) 100% dried FK. Exp. 2: 1) 100% OH, 2) 100% dried CG, and 3) 100% dried EPH. On day 8, 9, and 10, samples of solid and liquid effluent from each fermenter were taken for digestibility analysis, and subsamples were collected for NH3-N, VFA, and bacterial N determinations. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. In Exp. 1, treatments did not affect DM, OM, and NDF digestibilities, total VFA and molar proportions of acetate, propionate, butyrate, and branched-chain VFA. True CP digestibility, ruminal NH3-N concentration, and total N, NH3-N, NAN, and dietary N flows (g/d) were greater (P < 0.05) for FK compared with the other forages. However, treatments did not affect bacterial efficiency. In Exp. 2, DM, OM, and CP digestibilities were greater (P = 0.01) for EPH, and NDF digestibility was greater (P < 0.05) for EPH and CG compared with OH. Ephedra had the highest (P < 0.05) pH and acetate:propionate ratio and the lowest (P < 0.05) total VFA concentration. Total VFA, ruminal NH3-N concentration, and NH3-N flow (g/d) were highest (P < 0.05) for CG. Total N flow and bacterial efficiency were highest (P < 0.05) for OH and CG, while the flows (g/d) of NAN, bacterial N, and dietary N were greater (P < 0.05) for OH compared with the other forages. Results indicate that when compared with AH and OH (Exp. 1), FK has similar ruminal fermentation patterns and may be an adequate alternative for beef cattle producers. Furthermore, when compared with OH (Exp. 2), immature CG may also be an adequate forage alternative. This is especially important for areas in which conventional forages may not grow well such as the U.S. arid-land. However, EPH should not be used as the sole forage due to its poor ruminal fermentation as evidenced by the lowest total VFA concentration and propionate molar proportion.
References: Arch Biochem Biophys. 1963 May;101:269-77. (PMID: 14012183)
J Anim Sci. 2008 Feb;86(2):378-83. (PMID: 17998434)
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1138-47. (PMID: 20172235)
J Dairy Sci. 1972 Jan;55(1):125-9. (PMID: 5009526)
Br J Nutr. 1974 Sep;32(2):341-51. (PMID: 4213614)
J Anim Sci. 2016 Apr;94(4):1600-9. (PMID: 27136019)
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Nov;92(11):5512-22. (PMID: 19841214)
Br J Nutr. 1974 Sep;32(2):199-208. (PMID: 4472574)
J Anim Sci. 2013 Apr;91(4):1765-74. (PMID: 23345566)
J Dairy Sci. 1986 Oct;69(10):2755-66. (PMID: 3027148)
J Anim Sci. 2017 Mar;95(3):1335-1344. (PMID: 28380537)
Clin Chem. 1962 Apr;8:130-2. (PMID: 13878063)
J Anim Sci. 1989 Jun;67(6):1593-602. (PMID: 2768117)
J Anim Sci. 1996 Jun;74(6):1375-81. (PMID: 8791211)
J Anim Sci. 2008 Jun;86(6):1364-71. (PMID: 18344304)
J Dairy Sci. 1989 Nov;72(11):2991-8. (PMID: 2625489)
Br J Nutr. 1979 Jan;41(1):197-209. (PMID: 420753)
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0143201. (PMID: 26599015)
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Jan;82(1):153-60. (PMID: 10022017)
Oecologia. 1990 May;83(1):7-13. (PMID: 28313235)
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Mar;85(3):574-9. (PMID: 11949862)
J Dairy Sci. 2001 Jun;84(6):1449-57. (PMID: 11417705)
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3630-44. (PMID: 1744285)
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jul;100(7):5281-5292. (PMID: 28456405)
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3583-97. (PMID: 1660498)
Biochem J. 1948;43(1):99-109. (PMID: 16748377)
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Sep;95(9):5299-5307. (PMID: 22916935)
J Dairy Sci. 2013 May;96(5):3228-37. (PMID: 23522677)
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1999 Jul;13(13):1237-1241. (PMID: 10407304)
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Feb;100(2):1179-1188. (PMID: 27939544)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20180201 Date Completed: 20180824 Latest Revision: 20190201
رمز التحديث: 20221213
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC6140895
DOI: 10.1093/jas/skx071
PMID: 29385467
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1525-3163
DOI:10.1093/jas/skx071