دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study.
المؤلفون: Volpe MS; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil., Naves JM; Department of Applied Physiotherapy, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil., Ribeiro GG; Department of Applied Physiotherapy, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil., Ruas G; Department of Applied Physiotherapy, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil., Tucci MR; Laboratory for Medical Research 09, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
المصدر: PloS one [PLoS One] 2018 Feb 12; Vol. 13 (2), pp. e0191787. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Feb 12 (Print Publication: 2018).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Mucus* , Physical Therapy Modalities*, Respiration, Artificial/*adverse effects, Humans
مستخلص: Introduction: Manual hyperinflation (MH), a maneuver applied in mechanically ventilated patients to facilitate secretion removal, has large variation in its performance. Effectiveness of MH is usually evaluated by its capacity to generate an expiratory flow bias. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of MH-and its resulting flow bias-applied according to clinical practice versus according to expert recommendation on mucus movement in a lung model simulating a mechanically ventilated patient.
Methods: Twelve physiotherapists were asked to apply MH, using a self-inflating manual resuscitator, to a test lung as if to remove secretions under two conditions: according to their usual clinical practice (pre-instruction phase) and after verbal instruction to perform MH according to expert recommendation was given (post-instruction phase). Mucus simulant movement was measured with a photodensitometric technique. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), inspiratory time (TINSP), tidal volume (VT) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were measured continuously.
Results: It was found that MH performed post-instruction delivered a smaller VT (643.1 ± 57.8 ml) at a lower PIP (15.0 ± 1.5 cmH2O), lower PIF (38.0 ± 9.6 L/min), longer TINSP (1.84 ±0.54 s) and lower PEF (65.4 ± 6.7L/min) compared to MH pre-instruction. In the pre-instruction phase, MH resulted in a mean PIF/PEF ratio of 1.73 ± 0.38 and mean PEF-PIF difference of -54.6 ± 28.3 L/min, both out of the range for secretion removal. In the post-instruction phase both indexes were in the adequate range. Consequently, the mucus simulant was moved outward when MH was applied according to expert recommendation and towards the test lung when it was applied according to clinical practice.
Conclusions: Performance of MH during clinical practice with PIF higher than PEF was ineffective to clear secretion in a lung model simulating a mechanically ventilated patient. In order to remove secretion, MH should result in an adequate expiratory flow bias.
References: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2012 Mar;24(1):6-22. (PMID: 23917708)
Heart Lung. 2009 Nov-Dec;38(6):513-6. (PMID: 19944875)
Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):895-902. (PMID: 22080638)
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Jan;43(1):81-7. (PMID: 25579293)
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Apr;28(4):406-13. (PMID: 11967593)
Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(1):31-8. (PMID: 12600252)
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Mar;62(3):959-71. (PMID: 3571095)
Anaesthesia. 2007 Jan;62(1):27-33. (PMID: 17156224)
Rev Port Pneumol. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):283-8. (PMID: 21782380)
Crit Care. 2012 Aug 03;16(4):R145. (PMID: 22863373)
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1287-94. (PMID: 18811989)
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;17(4):801-10. (PMID: 20630012)
Chest. 2013 Sep;144(3):825-847. (PMID: 23722822)
Chest. 2003 Jul;124(1):262-8. (PMID: 12853532)
Respir Care. 2015 Oct;60(10):1449-58. (PMID: 26350234)
Chest. 1989 Mar;95(3):658-63. (PMID: 2920595)
Burns. 2013 Mar;39(2):236-42. (PMID: 23107354)
Crit Care. 2016 Oct 7;20(1):316. (PMID: 27716405)
Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;96(7):933-9. (PMID: 26893503)
Respir Care. 2005 Mar;50(3):340-4. (PMID: 15737243)
J Bras Pneumol. 2013 Mar-Apr;39(2):205-13. (PMID: 23670506)
Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(2):121-31. (PMID: 11552867)
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jul;30(7):1334-9. (PMID: 14999444)
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000 Jun;28(3):255-61. (PMID: 10853205)
J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;24(3):e17-8. (PMID: 19664520)
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2009 Aug;25(4):199-207. (PMID: 19477647)
Nurs Crit Care. 2016 Jan;21(1):36-43. (PMID: 24801958)
Chest. 2005 Nov;128(5):3699-704. (PMID: 16304336)
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011 Feb;17(1):57-63. (PMID: 21169827)
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jul;34(7):1188-99. (PMID: 18283429)
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Jun;30(3):283-8. (PMID: 12075634)
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2002 Sep 4;132(3):321-7. (PMID: 12208090)
Aust J Physiother. 1999;45(3):185-193. (PMID: 11676766)
Eur Respir J. 1999 Oct;14(4):958-65. (PMID: 10573249)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20180213 Date Completed: 20180313 Latest Revision: 20181113
رمز التحديث: 20240628
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC5809045
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191787
PMID: 29432468
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0191787