دورية أكاديمية

Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid.
المؤلفون: Gauci MO; Institut Universitaire Locomoteur et du Sport, Hôpital Pasteur 2 and Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice Cedex 1, France., Bonnevialle N; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse-Purpan, Toulouse, France., Moineau G; Clinique Pasteur-Lanroze, Brest, France., Baba M; Sydney Adventist Hospital, Wahroonga, New South Wales, Australia., Walch G; Centre Médical Santy, Lyon, France., Boileau P; Institut Universitaire Locomoteur et du Sport, Hôpital Pasteur 2 and Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice Cedex 1, France.
المصدر: The bone & joint journal [Bone Joint J] 2018 Apr 01; Vol. 100-B (4), pp. 485-492.
نوع المنشور: Comparative Study; Evaluation Study; Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101599229 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2049-4408 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20494394 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Bone Joint J Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Prosthesis Failure* , Shoulder Prosthesis*, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder/*methods , Osteoarthritis/*surgery, Adult ; Age Factors ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder/instrumentation ; Bone Cements ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
مستخلص: Aims: Controversy about the use of an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) in young arthritic patients relates to which is the ideal form of fixation for the glenoid component: cemented or cementless. This study aimed to evaluate implant survival of aTSA when used in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), and to compare the survival of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed glenoid components.
Materials and Methods: A total of 69 consecutive aTSAs were performed in 67 patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Their mean age at the time of surgery was 54 years (35 to 60). Of these aTSAs, 46 were undertaken using a cemented polyethylene component and 23 were undertaken using a cementless metal-backed component. The age, gender, preoperative function, mobility, premorbid glenoid erosion, and length of follow-up were comparable in the two groups. The patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at a mean of 10.3 years (5 to 12, sd 26) postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with revision as the endpoint.
Results: A total of 26 shoulders (38%) underwent revision surgery: ten (22%) in the polyethylene group and 16 (70%) in the metal-backed group (p < 0.0001). At 12 years' follow-up, the rate of implant survival was 74% (sd 0.09) for polyethylene components and 24% (sd 0.10) for metal-backed components (p < 0.0002). Glenoid loosening or failure was the indication for revision in the polyethylene group, whereas polyethylene wear with metal-on-metal contact, instability, and insufficiency of the rotator cuff were the indications for revision in the metal-backed group. Preoperative posterior subluxation of the humeral head with a biconcave/retroverted glenoid (Walch B2) had an adverse effect on the survival of a metal-backed component.
Conclusion: The survival of a cemented polyethylene glenoid component is three times higher than that of a cementless metal-backed glenoid component ten years after aTSA in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Patients with a biconcave (B2) glenoid have the highest risk of failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:485-92.
References: J Arthroplasty. 1999 Sep;14(6):756-60. (PMID: 10512449)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jan;82(1):26-34. (PMID: 10653081)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Jul-Aug;11(4):351-9. (PMID: 12195253)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 May-Jun;12(3):207-13. (PMID: 12851570)
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 Mar;19(3):292-302. (PMID: 15003345)
J Biomech. 2004 Nov;37(11):1777-86. (PMID: 15388321)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;13(6):599-603. (PMID: 15570227)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;13(6):604-13. (PMID: 15570228)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jun;87(6):1284-92. (PMID: 15930538)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):1947-56. (PMID: 16140808)
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Aug 04;8:76. (PMID: 17683577)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):717-21. (PMID: 18061114)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Sep-Oct;17(5):779-83. (PMID: 18486494)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jun;90(6):764-9. (PMID: 18539670)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2180-8. (PMID: 18829916)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):859-63. (PMID: 19297199)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul;19(5):749-56. (PMID: 20189834)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jan;20(1):123-30. (PMID: 20797877)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Feb;93(2):210-6. (PMID: 21282761)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Nov;93(11):1513-7. (PMID: 22058304)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jan 18;94(2):145-50. (PMID: 22258001)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 18;94(8):685-93. (PMID: 22419408)
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Jan;18(1):22-8. (PMID: 23011495)
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Jan;23(1):27-34. (PMID: 23293576)
Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1297-305. (PMID: 23685831)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Nov;22(11):1589-98. (PMID: 24007651)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Jun;23(6):775-81. (PMID: 24280355)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 18;96(12):1041-1047. (PMID: 24951741)
Int Orthop. 2015 Feb;39(2):299-304. (PMID: 25319947)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1860-7. (PMID: 25758376)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Oct;24(10):1534-43. (PMID: 26227769)
Int J Shoulder Surg. 2015 Oct-Dec;9(4):121-7. (PMID: 26622128)
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan;98-B(1):75-80. (PMID: 26733518)
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jul;98-B(7):969-75. (PMID: 27365476)
Bone Joint J. 2016 Aug;98-B(8):1080-5. (PMID: 27482021)
Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):666-673. (PMID: 28455477)
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jul;99-B(7):939-943. (PMID: 28663401)
Bone Joint J. 2017 Sep;99-B(9):1190-1196. (PMID: 28860399)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jan;(214):160-4. (PMID: 3791738)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Oct;(307):7-17. (PMID: 7924049)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Oct;(307):86-93. (PMID: 7924051)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996 May-Jun;5(3):231-48. (PMID: 8816346)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Sep;79(5):857-65. (PMID: 9331050)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: All-polyethylene glenoid; Metal-backed glenoid; Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Revision; Survival; Total shoulder arthroplasty
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Bone Cements)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20180410 Date Completed: 20180423 Latest Revision: 20200225
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC6503758
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0495.R2
PMID: 29629579
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2049-4408
DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0495.R2