دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient experiences of central venous access devices in anti-cancer treatment.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient experiences of central venous access devices in anti-cancer treatment.
المؤلفون: Ryan C; Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Caoimhe.Ryan@glasgow.ac.uk., Hesselgreaves H; School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK., Wu O; Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK., Paul J; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK., Dixon-Hughes J; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK., Moss JG; Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
المصدر: Systematic reviews [Syst Rev] 2018 Apr 18; Vol. 7 (1), pp. 61. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Apr 18.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101580575 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2046-4053 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20464053 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Syst Rev Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : BioMed Central
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Vascular Access Devices*, Catheterization, Central Venous/*methods , Neoplasms/*drug therapy , Outpatients/*psychology, Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation ; Catheters, Indwelling ; Drug Therapy/methods ; Humans ; Perception ; Systematic Reviews as Topic
مستخلص: Background: Three types of central venous access devices (CVADs)-peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), skin-tunnelled central catheters (Hickman-type devices), and implantable chest wall Ports (Ports)-are routinely used in the intravenous administration of anti-cancer treatment. These devices avoid the need for peripheral cannulation and allow for home delivery of treatment. Assessments of these devices have tended to focus on medical and economic factors, but there is increased interest in the importance of patient experiences and perspectives in this area. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise existing research regarding patient experiences of these CVADs to help clinicians guide, prepare, and support patients receiving CVADs for the administration of anti-cancer treatment.
Method: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL research databases will be carried out along with a supplementary reference list search. This review will include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies published in peer-review journals, reporting some aspect(s) of patient experiences or perspectives regarding the use of PICC, Hickman, or Port CVADs for the administration of anti-cancer drugs. The methodological quality and risk of bias of included papers will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Relevant outcome data will be extracted from included studies and analysed using a thematic synthesis approach.
Discussion: The results section of the review will comprise thematic synthesis of quantitative studies, thematic synthesis of qualitative studies, and the aggregation of the two. Results will aim to offer an account of current understandings of patient experiences and perspective regarding PICC, Hickman-type, and Port devices in the context of anti-cancer treatment. Confidence in cumulative evidence will be assessed using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) approach.
Systematic Review Registration: This systematic review protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Registration number: CRD42017065851 . This protocol was prepared using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols checklist (PRISMA-P) (Shamseer et al., BMJ 349: 2015).
References: J Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;62(4):1032-1039.e2. (PMID: 26141698)
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 Dec;28(6):642-4. (PMID: 15531201)
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Mar;24(3):1181-7. (PMID: 26279148)
ACP J Club. 1995 Nov-Dec;123(3):A12-3. (PMID: 7582737)
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 27;12(10):e1001895. (PMID: 26506244)
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Aug;37(4):990-1008. (PMID: 24218174)
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45. (PMID: 18616818)
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2010 May;26(2):88-101. (PMID: 20434642)
J Vasc Access. 2016 Nov 2;17 (6):527-534. (PMID: 27768211)
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43. (PMID: 22829486)
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. (PMID: 19621072)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Central venous access devices; Chemotherapy; Patient experience; Patient perspectives; Protocol; Systematic review; Vascular access
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20180420 Date Completed: 20190114 Latest Revision: 20230829
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC5907379
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0721-x
PMID: 29669583
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2046-4053
DOI:10.1186/s13643-018-0721-x