دورية أكاديمية
The preprint debate: What are the issues?
| العنوان: | The preprint debate: What are the issues? |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Teixeira da Silva JA; P. O. Box 7, Miki-cho Post Office, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken 761-0799, Japan. |
| المصدر: | Medical journal, Armed Forces India [Med J Armed Forces India] 2018 Apr; Vol. 74 (2), pp. 162-164. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 05. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Review |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: V. Parkash Country of Publication: India NLM ID: 7602492 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0377-1237 (Print) Linking ISSN: 03771237 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Med J Armed Forces India Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: New Delhi : V. Parkash |
| مستخلص: | The debate surrounding preprints is increasing. Preprint proponents claim that preprints are a way to shore up trust in academic publishing, that they provide an additional 'quality' screen prior to traditional peer review, that they can assist with the replication crisis plaguing science in part by making negative or contradictory results public, and that they speed up the publishing process because fundamental results can be presented early, serving as timely reports for the purposes of tenure or grant funding. Preprint skeptics and critics claim that preprints may represent a risk and a danger to quality-based academic publishing because they are documents that have not been carefully and thoroughly vetted prior to their release into the public domain. Thus, academics who cite invalid, poorly vetted, or false facts could cause harm, not unlike the unscholarly 'predatory' open access movement. Feedback on work from lesser-known groups, or on less glamorous topics, may be null or worse than from traditional peer review, annulling an initial key objective of preprints. Although there is no widespread empirical evidence or data yet regarding some of these issues, academics should be aware of the ideological, financial, and political tug-of-war taking place before deciding if they wish to publish their important findings as a preprint prior or simultaneous to submitting to a regular journal for peer review. |
| References: | Science. 2016 May 20;352(6288):899-901. (PMID: 27199406) Med J Armed Forces India. 2017 Apr;73(2):178-180. (PMID: 28924320) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: ASAPbio; DOI; Preprint server; arXiv; bioRxiv |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20180426 Latest Revision: 20211119 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC5912112 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.002 |
| PMID: | 29692484 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 0377-1237 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.002 |