دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

A case report of giant pancreatic pseudocyst following acute pancreatitis: experience with endoscopic internal drainage.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A case report of giant pancreatic pseudocyst following acute pancreatitis: experience with endoscopic internal drainage.
المؤلفون: Udeshika WAE; National Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka., Herath HMMTB; National Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka. tharukaherath11@gmail.com., Dassanayake SUB; National Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka., Pahalagamage SP; National Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka., Kulatunga A; National Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
المصدر: BMC research notes [BMC Res Notes] 2018 Apr 27; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 262. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Apr 27.
نوع المنشور: Case Reports; Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Biomed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101462768 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1756-0500 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17560500 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Res Notes Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : Biomed Central, 2008.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Drainage/*methods , Endoscopy, Digestive System/*methods , Endosonography/*methods , Pancreatic Pseudocyst/*diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Pseudocyst/*surgery , Pancreatitis/*complications, Adult ; Humans ; Male ; Pancreatic Pseudocyst/etiology
مستخلص: Background: Pancreatic cysts are being diagnosed more frequently because of the increasing usage of imaging techniques. A pseudocyst with the major diameter of 10 cm is termed as a giant cyst. Asymptomatic pseudo-cysts up to 6 cm in diameter can be safely observed and monitored without intervention, but larger and symptomatic pseudocysts require intervention.
Case Presentation: A 27-year-old Sri Lankan male, with history of heavy alcohol use, presented with progressive abdominal distension following an episode of acute pancreatitis. Contrast enhanced CT scan of the abdomen showed a large multilocular cystic lesion almost occupying the entire abdominal cavity and displacing the liver medially and the right dome of the diaphragm superiorly. The largest locule in the right side measured as 30 cm × 15 cm × 14 cm. Endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of the cyst was performed. The cyst was entered into with an electrocautery-assisted cystotome and a lumen-opposing metal stent was deployed under fluoroscopic vision followed by dilatation with a 10 mm controlled radial expansion balloon. Repeat endoscopic ultrasound was done a week later due to persistence of the collection and a second stent was inserted. Then 10 French gauge × 10 cm double ended pigtails were inserted through both stents. The cysts were not visualized on subsequent Ultra sound scans. Stent removal was done after 3 weeks, leaving the pigtails insitu. The patient made an uneventful recovery.
Conclusion: Giant pancreatic pseudocysts are rare and earlier drainage is recommended before clinical deterioration. Some experts suggest that cystogastrostomy may not be appropriate for the treatment of giant pancreatic pseudocysts and in some instances external drainage of giant pancreatic pseudocysts may be safer than cystogastrostomy. Video-assisted pancreatic necrosectomy with internal drainage and laparoscopic cystogastrostomy were also tried with a good outcome. With our experience we suggest endoscopic guided internal drainage as a possible initial method of management of a giant pseudo cyst. However long-term follow up is needed with repeated imaging and endoscopy. In instances where the primary endoscopic internal drainage fails, surgical procedures may be required as a second line option.
References: Gastroenterology. 2013 Sep;145(3):583-90.e1. (PMID: 23732774)
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(1):35-48. (PMID: 19258185)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Apr;63(4):635-43. (PMID: 16564865)
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 May;22(5):325-7. (PMID: 22538041)
Am J Surg. 1979 Jan;137(1):135-41. (PMID: 758840)
South Med J. 1967 Apr;60(4):389-93. (PMID: 6021536)
Dig Endosc. 2009 Jul;21 Suppl 1:S82-6. (PMID: 19691744)
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Jun;152(6):809-12. (PMID: 7244958)
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3730-40. (PMID: 26675934)
Arch Surg. 1975 May;110(5):500-5. (PMID: 1130994)
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Mar;54(74):599-601. (PMID: 17523330)
Eur J Radiol. 2002 Sep;43(3):219-28. (PMID: 12204404)
Surgery. 1992 Feb;111(2):123-30. (PMID: 1736380)
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 May;170(5):411-7. (PMID: 2326721)
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;42(4):524-9. (PMID: 17454865)
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Sep;173(3):171-4. (PMID: 1925874)
Am J Surg. 1996 Sep;172(3):228-31. (PMID: 8862072)
JOP. 2004 Sep 10;5(5):338-47. (PMID: 15365200)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Nov;15(11):2080-8. (PMID: 21786063)
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2012 Jul-Aug;11(4):227-9. (PMID: 22553316)
Arch Surg. 1993 May;128(5):586-90. (PMID: 8489394)
Surgeon. 2005 Feb;3(1):37-41. (PMID: 15789792)
Arch Surg. 2000 Feb;135(2):136-40; discussion 141. (PMID: 10668869)
BMJ Case Rep. 2015 Mar 24;2015 :null. (PMID: 25804943)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Acute pancreatitis; Endoscopic internal drainage; Giant pancreatic pseudocyst
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20180429 Date Completed: 20181001 Latest Revision: 20181114
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC5923028
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3375-9
PMID: 29703250
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1756-0500
DOI:10.1186/s13104-018-3375-9