دورية أكاديمية
Searching for answers: How well do depression websites answer the public's questions about treatment choices?
العنوان: | Searching for answers: How well do depression websites answer the public's questions about treatment choices? |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Walsh K; Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, 363 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 0G1, Canada., Pryor TAM; Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, P313 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada., Reynolds KA; Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, P313 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada. Electronic address: Kristin.Reynolds@Umanitoba.ca., Walker JR; Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, 363 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 0G1, Canada. |
مؤلفون مشاركون: | Mobilizing Minds Research Group |
المصدر: | Patient education and counseling [Patient Educ Couns] 2019 Jan; Vol. 102 (1), pp. 99-105. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Aug 18. |
نوع المنشور: | Evaluation Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
اللغة: | English |
بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Elsevier Country of Publication: Ireland NLM ID: 8406280 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-5134 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 07383991 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Patient Educ Couns |
أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: Limerick : Elsevier Original Publication: Princeton, N.J. : Excerpta Medica, c1983- |
مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Consumer Health Information* , Internet* , Patient Education as Topic*, Depression/*therapy, Health Literacy ; Humans ; Reading ; Search Engine |
مستخلص: | Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate websites providing information on treatment for depression to the public, and to evaluate changes in the quality of website information over time. Methods: Websites (N = 25) addressing depression treatment were identified through the use of the Google search engine and by suggestions from healthcare professionals. Each website was evaluated based on the extent to which it addressed content areas deemed important by the public identified in previous research, overall quality as determined by the DISCERN, and reading level. Results: Overall, the quality of depression websites varied greatly. The majority of websites did not adequately answer the public's questions about treatment options, and presented higher quality information in the area of pharmacological treatments as compared to other treatment options. An average reading level of 10.0 was found across websites. Upon re-evaluation, only 14 of 25 websites added new content, and the majority of websites did not improve in their overall website quality (as measured by the DISCERN). Conclusion and Practice Implications: Websites could be improved by addressing important questions that consumers have concerning depression, as well as by creating higher quality content in the areas of psychological, neurotherapeutic, and alternative treatments. (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.) |
معلومات مُعتمدة: | International Canadian Institutes of Health Research |
فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Depression; Information quality; Internet; Patient education; Treatment decision making; e-health |
تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20180829 Date Completed: 20190724 Latest Revision: 20191210 |
رمز التحديث: | 20221213 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.019 |
PMID: | 30150127 |
قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
تدمد: | 1873-5134 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.019 |