دورية أكاديمية
Antagonistic recursivities and successive cover-ups: the case of private nuclear proliferation.
| العنوان: | Antagonistic recursivities and successive cover-ups: the case of private nuclear proliferation. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Mallard G; Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. |
| المصدر: | The British journal of sociology [Br J Sociol] 2018 Dec; Vol. 69 (4), pp. 1007-1030. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Oct 05. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0373126 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1468-4446 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00071315 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Br J Sociol Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: London : published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science Original Publication: London, Published by Routledge & Kegan Paul for London, London School of Economics and Political Science. |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | International Agencies* , International Cooperation* , Nuclear Energy* , Public Policy*, Government ; Humans ; Internationality ; Libya ; Organizational Case Studies ; Pakistan ; Policy Making ; United States |
| مستخلص: | "Legal recursivity" is a concept introduced by socio-legal scholars to capture the progressive elaboration of transnational rules through policy linkages at the international and domestic levels, and the associated jurisdictional expansion of international institutions to new policy areas. Recursivity can take many forms, and this article introduces the concept of "antagonistic recursivity" to capture a dual process of recursive legal innovation and antagonistic obstruction by the same policy actors. The article shows how such antagonistic recursivity worked in the case of the global fight against private nuclear proliferators after the 2003 revelations about the reach of the A. Q. Khan network. In the case under study, antagonistic recursivities took the form of executive-driven innovation in rule-making and simultaneous subversion of the same rules by the executive most implicated in the new cycle of policy innovation: the United States government. This paradox can be explained in the following manner. Antagonistic recursivity, the article demonstrates, is likely to emerge when legal rules of global governance have already been previously defined in an opaque manner, so as to help hegemons follow multiple foreign policy goals: the subversion of the most recent policy innovations is then the unfortunate result of attempts to hide prior cover-ups rather than a purposeful violation of new rules. (© London School of Economics and Political Science 2018.) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: A.Q. Khan; Foreign Policy; Nonproliferation; Strategic Ignorance |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20181006 Date Completed: 20190604 Latest Revision: 20190604 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20221213 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/1468-4446.12494 |
| PMID: | 30289159 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1468-4446 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1111/1468-4446.12494 |