دورية أكاديمية

Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game.
المؤلفون: Bellucci G; Department of Psychology I, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany., Hahn T; Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany., Deshpande G; AU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.; Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.; Center for Health Ecology and Equity Research, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.; Alabama Advanced Imaging Consortium, Auburn University and University of Alabama Birmingham, Auburn, AL, USA., Krueger F; School of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. FKrueger@gmu.edu.; Department of Psychology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. FKrueger@gmu.edu.
المصدر: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience [Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci] 2019 Feb; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 165-176.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101083946 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1531-135X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15307026 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2011- : New York : Springer
Original Publication: Austin, TX : Psychonomic Society, c2001-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Social Behavior*, Brain/*physiology , Neural Pathways/*physiology , Trust/*psychology, Adult ; Brain Mapping ; Cooperative Behavior ; Decision Making/physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Individuality ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male
مستخلص: Economic games are used to elicit a social, conflictual situation in which people have to make decisions weighing self-related and collective interests. Combining these games with task-based fMRI has been shown to be successful in investigating the neural underpinnings of cooperative behaviors. However, it remains elusive to which extent resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) represents an individual's propensity to prosocial behaviors in the context of economic games. Here, we investigated whether task-free RSFC predicts individual differences in the propensity to trust and reciprocate in a one-round trust game (TG) employing a prediction-analytics framework. Our results demonstrated that individual differences in the propensity to trust and reciprocity could be predicted by individual differences in the RSFC. Different subnetworks of the default-mode network associated with mentalizing exclusively predicted trust and reciprocity. Moreover, reciprocity was further predicted by the frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular networks associated with cognitive control and saliency, respectively. Our results contribute to a better understanding of how complex social behaviors are enrooted in large-scale intrinsic brain dynamics, which may represent neuromarkers for impairment of prosocial behavior in mental health disorders.
References: Nat Neurosci. 2017 Feb 23;20(3):365-377. (PMID: 28230847)
Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8. (PMID: 11557895)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Mar;38(3):1233-1248. (PMID: 27859899)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 26;104(26):11073-8. (PMID: 17576922)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 27;98(7):4259-64. (PMID: 11259662)
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:959-970. (PMID: 27746386)
Neuron. 2002 Jul 18;35(2):395-405. (PMID: 12160756)
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(12):e1002841. (PMID: 23300423)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 May;7(5):225-231. (PMID: 12757825)
Neuron. 2006 Jun 1;50(5):799-812. (PMID: 16731517)
J Adolesc. 2014 Feb;37(2):175-84. (PMID: 24439623)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 23;6:137. (PMID: 22654746)
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 21;9(1):589. (PMID: 29467408)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):20084-9. (PMID: 18056800)
Front Psychol. 2011 Jul 27;2:173. (PMID: 21847383)
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Nov;41(11):1523-36. (PMID: 26330455)
Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):829-32. (PMID: 17023614)
J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2349-56. (PMID: 17329432)
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 21;6:965. (PMID: 26257665)
Science. 2010 Sep 10;329(5997):1358-61. (PMID: 20829489)
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Sep;1(9):650-656. (PMID: 28944297)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):95-116. (PMID: 28358543)
Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(5):494-509. (PMID: 22293039)
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jan;19(1):165-71. (PMID: 26595653)
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):459-73. (PMID: 12689373)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 8;106(49):20895-9. (PMID: 19948957)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jun;14(6):277-90. (PMID: 20493761)
Neuron. 2015 Jan 7;85(1):11-26. (PMID: 25569345)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):103-9. (PMID: 19223228)
Nat Commun. 2014 Sep 16;5:4939. (PMID: 25225950)
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):159-65. (PMID: 18639633)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 29;106(39):16835-40. (PMID: 19805382)
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):60-70. (PMID: 21164174)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Apr;9(4):395-402. (PMID: 23202661)
Front Syst Neurosci. 2012 Mar 06;6:7. (PMID: 22408609)
Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1755-8. (PMID: 12805551)
Brain Cogn. 2013 Feb;81(1):95-117. (PMID: 23174433)
Am J Psychol. 2005 Fall;118(3):431-57. (PMID: 16255128)
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 25;35(8):3412-9. (PMID: 25716841)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9673-8. (PMID: 15976020)
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Aug;19(3):277-302. (PMID: 25552474)
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:39-60. (PMID: 18400923)
Neuroimage. 2018 May 15;172:341-356. (PMID: 29410219)
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 15;87:96-110. (PMID: 24239590)
Neuron. 2007 Oct 4;56(1):185-96. (PMID: 17920024)
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202. (PMID: 11283309)
Cognition. 1995 Nov;57(2):109-28. (PMID: 8556839)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Mar;30(3):829-58. (PMID: 18381770)
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3859-74. (PMID: 18829425)
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Sep;92:378-389. (PMID: 29958872)
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):796-803. (PMID: 18721917)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Sep;4(3):294-304. (PMID: 19304843)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12702-12707. (PMID: 29133403)
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Nov;18(11):1664-71. (PMID: 26457551)
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Nov 1;27(11):5415-5429. (PMID: 28968754)
Nature. 2003 Oct 23;425(6960):785-91. (PMID: 14574401)
Neuron. 2017 Aug 16;95(4):791-807.e7. (PMID: 28757305)
Neuroimage. 2015 Sep;118:231-6. (PMID: 26070266)
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 28;7:1866. (PMID: 27965606)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Jun;10(6):809-13. (PMID: 25274577)
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38. (PMID: 18400922)
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Oct 1;292:478-83. (PMID: 26166191)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 6;106(40):17199-204. (PMID: 19805082)
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 Oct 13;369(1952):3768-84. (PMID: 21893527)
Neuron. 2011 May 12;70(3):560-72. (PMID: 21555080)
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 May 19;370(1668):null. (PMID: 25823869)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):49-57. (PMID: 17188554)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Machine learning; Multivariate regression analysis; Reciprocity; Resting-state functional connectivity; Trust; Trust game
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20181026 Date Completed: 20200410 Latest Revision: 20200410
رمز التحديث: 20240628
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-00654-3
PMID: 30357662
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1531-135X
DOI:10.3758/s13415-018-00654-3