دورية أكاديمية

Reliability and Validity of Measurement Tools for Residual Limb Volume in People With Limb Amputations: A Systematic Review.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Reliability and Validity of Measurement Tools for Residual Limb Volume in People With Limb Amputations: A Systematic Review.
المؤلفون: Armitage L; Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2052., Kark L; Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW Sydney., Czerniec S; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia., Kwah LK; Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
المصدر: Physical therapy [Phys Ther] 2019 May 01; Vol. 99 (5), pp. 612-626.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Systematic Review
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Oxford University Press Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0022623 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1538-6724 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00319023 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Phys Ther Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2017- : New York : Oxford University Press
Original Publication: Alexandria, VA : American Physical Therapy Association
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Artificial Limbs* , Extremities*, Amputation, Surgical/*rehabilitation , Anthropometry/*methods, Humans ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results
مستخلص: Background: Measurements of residual limb volume often guide decisions on the type and timing of prosthetic prescription. To help inform these decisions, it is important that clinicians use measurement tools that are reliable and valid.
Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the reliability and validity of measurement tools for residual limb volume in people with limb amputations.
Data Sources: A comprehensive search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed on July 11, 2016.
Study Selection: Studies were included if they examined the reliability or validity of measurement tools for residual limb volume, were conducted on humans, and were published in English.
Data Extraction: Data were extracted from 11 reliability and 4 validity studies and included study characteristics, volumetric estimates, and reliability and validity estimates. The quality of the studies was also rated.
Data Synthesis: Data from 2 studies (38 participants) indicated good to excellent intrarater (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥0.88) and interrater (ICC ≥0.88) reliability and high between-session reliability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 10%) for water displacement volumetry. One study (28 participants) reported excellent intrarater and interrater reliability (ICC ≥0.93) for the circumferential method, and data from 2 studies (19 participants) indicated high between-session reliability for the optical surface scanner (CV ≤9.8%). Three studies (26 participants) indicated good to excellent between-session reliability results for computed tomography (CV = 9.2%-10.9%). One study (7 participants) showed moderate within-session reliability (CV = 50%). Using water displacement volumetry as the gold standard, 2 studies (79 participants) indicated excellent validity for the circumferential method ( r ≥0.92; ICC ≥0.92). All studies reporting measures of reliability or validity were performed with people who had transtibial amputations.
Limitations: Only studies published in English and in which water displacement volumetry was used as the gold standard were included in this review. The reliability and validity of the quality rating scale used in this review have not been tested.
Conclusions: On the basis of a limited number of moderate- to high-quality studies with small sample sizes, circumferential and water displacement methods were found to be reliable, and the circumferential method was found to be valid in people with transtibial amputations. There are inadequate data for drawing conclusions about volume measurement methods in people with other types of limb amputations.
(© 2019 American Physical Therapy Association.)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20190206 Date Completed: 20191206 Latest Revision: 20221207
رمز التحديث: 20231215
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzz010
PMID: 30722026
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1538-6724
DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzz010