دورية أكاديمية

High Risk of Further Surgery After Radial Head Replacement for Unstable Fractures: Longer-term Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 8 Years.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: High Risk of Further Surgery After Radial Head Replacement for Unstable Fractures: Longer-term Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 8 Years.
المؤلفون: Cristofaro CD; C. D. Cristofaro, T. H. Carter, N. R. Wickramasinghe, M. M. McQueen, T. O. White, A. D. Duckworth, Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK., Carter TH, Wickramasinghe NR, McQueen MM, White TO, Duckworth AD
المصدر: Clinical orthopaedics and related research [Clin Orthop Relat Res] 2019 Nov; Vol. 477 (11), pp. 2531-2540.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0075674 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1528-1132 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0009921X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Orthop Relat Res Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2018- : [New York, NY] : Wolters Kluwer
Original Publication: Philadelphia : Lippincott,
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Elbow Joint*, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Elbow/*adverse effects , Joint Instability/*surgery , Postoperative Complications/*epidemiology , Radius Fractures/*surgery , Reoperation/*adverse effects, Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Device Removal ; Elbow Prosthesis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects ; Humans ; Joint Instability/etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
مستخلص: Background: The evidence for treating acute, unreconstructable radial head fractures in unstable elbows with radial head replacement predominantly consists of short- to mid-term follow-up studies with a heterogenous mix of implants and operative techniques. Data on longer-term patient-reported outcomes after radial head replacement is lacking.
Questions/purposes: (1) What proportion of patients undergo revision or implant removal after radial head replacement? (2) At a minimum of 8 years follow-up, what are the patient-reported outcomes (QuickDASH, Oxford Elbow Score, and EuroQol-5D)? (3) What factors are associated with a superior long-term patient-reported outcome, according to the QuickDASH?
Methods: Between September 1994 and September 2010, we surgically treated 157 patients for acute radial head fractures. We excluded patients where the radial head was excised (n = 21), internally fixed (n = 15), or replaced as a secondary procedure after failed internal fixation (n = 2). A total of 119 patients who underwent radial head replacement surgery for an acute unreconstructable fracture were included, with a mean age of 50 years (range 15 to 93 ± 19 years), and 53% of patients (63) were women. All but two implants were uncemented, loose-fitting, monopolar prostheses, of which 86% (102) were metallic and 14% (17) were silastic. Implants were only cemented if they appeared unstable within the proximal radius. Silastic implants were used in the earlier series and replaced by metallic implants starting in 2000. We reviewed electronic records to document postoperative complications and prosthesis revision and removal. A member of the local research team (THC, CDC) who was not previously involved in patient care contacted patients to confirm complications, reoperations and to obtain long-term patient-reported outcomes scores. Nineteen patients had died at the point of outcome score collection. Of the remaining 100 patients, 80 were contacted (67% of total cohort), at a median of 11 years (range 8 to 24 years) after injury. The primary outcome measure was the QuickDASH score.
Results: Of 119 patients, 25% (30) underwent reoperation, with three patients undergoing revision and 27 patients undergoing prosthesis removal at a median of 7 months (range 0 to 125 months). Twenty-one of 30 procedures (70%) occurred within 1 year after implantation. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis demonstrated a cumulative implant survival rate of 71%. In the 80 patients contacted, the mean QuickDASH score was 13 ± 14, the mean Oxford Elbow Score was 43 ± 6, and the median EuroQol-5D score was 0.8 (-0.3 to 1.0). After controlling for covariates, we found that prothesis revision or removal (p = 0.466) and prosthesis type (p = 0.553) were not associated with patient-reported outcome, according to the QuickDASH.
Conclusions: The management of acute unreconstructable fractures of the radial head in unstable elbow injuries with radial head replacement has a high risk of reoperation. Patients must be counselled regarding this risk of secondary intervention, of which the peak risk appears to be within 1 year after implantation. Despite this, patients report low disability according to the QuickDASH at a minimum follow-up of 8 years.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
التعليقات: Comment in: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2541-2543. (PMID: 31389886)
References: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jan;21(1):98-104. (PMID: 21856178)
Qual Life Res. 2008 Dec;17(10):1257-67. (PMID: 18958582)
Int Orthop. 2011 Jul;35(7):1071-6. (PMID: 20680272)
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2403-2411. (PMID: 30062566)
J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(3):283-9. (PMID: 1403245)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Apr 6;98(7):527-35. (PMID: 27053580)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Dec;(297):224-30. (PMID: 8242935)
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Oct;101(6):729-34. (PMID: 26321464)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jan;20(1):45-50. (PMID: 21134664)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jan;28(1):126-130. (PMID: 30342823)
Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8. (PMID: 8773720)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Nov;89(11):2469-76. (PMID: 17974891)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Oct;84(10):1811-5. (PMID: 12377912)
Bone Joint J. 2013 Feb;95-B(2):151-9. (PMID: 23365021)
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jan;39(1):100-7. (PMID: 24268831)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Mar;28(3):578-586. (PMID: 30626538)
J Trauma. 2001 Jan;50(1):46-52. (PMID: 11231669)
Bone Joint J. 2017 Sep;99-B(9):1197-1203. (PMID: 28860400)
Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72. (PMID: 10158943)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Mar;80(2):231-3. (PMID: 9546450)
J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5(1):21-8. (PMID: 2023039)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 May;92(5):661-7. (PMID: 20436003)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1201-11. (PMID: 11507129)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Oct;19(7):965-72. (PMID: 20846619)
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 1;13(1):134. (PMID: 29859102)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jun;94(6):805-10. (PMID: 22628596)
Bone Joint J. 2017 Dec;99-B(12):1561-1570. (PMID: 29212677)
J Invest Surg. 2018 Jun;31(3):178-184. (PMID: 28901795)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):558-66. (PMID: 20194313)
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(6):1120-3. (PMID: 19481361)
Int Orthop. 2009 Feb;33(1):249-53. (PMID: 17938924)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):e38-e44. (PMID: 29128376)
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 May-Jun;32(5):630-6. (PMID: 17482000)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Oct;88(10):2192-200. (PMID: 17015596)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):1075-80. (PMID: 17473146)
JBJS Rev. 2016 Oct 18;4(10):. (PMID: 27792673)
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Apr;26(4):229-35. (PMID: 22048180)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jun;68(5):669-74. (PMID: 3722222)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2136-43. (PMID: 24549774)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):274-80. (PMID: 14960671)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Sep;85(7):1040-4. (PMID: 14516043)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2 Suppl):S107-12. (PMID: 21281915)
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Jan;43(1):39-53.e1. (PMID: 29054353)
J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(4):318-23. (PMID: 7562154)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Sep;20(6):996-1007. (PMID: 21600788)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Sep;86(9):1925-30. (PMID: 15342754)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20190808 Date Completed: 20200605 Latest Revision: 20201101
رمز التحديث: 20221213
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC6903861
DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000876
PMID: 31389899
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1528-1132
DOI:10.1097/CORR.0000000000000876