دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

The Vital Role of Professionalism in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Vital Role of Professionalism in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
المؤلفون: Silver JK; From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachussetts (JKS, SB); Spaulding Rehabilitation Network, Boston, Massachussetts (JKS, SB); Association of Academic Physiatrists Women in Academic Physiatry Task Force, Owing Mills, Maryland (JKS, SC, LDW, CV, MO-P, DPK, WRF, TKF, GB, SB, AFA); JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute, Edison, New Jersey (SC, TKF); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey (SC, TKF); Hackensack Meridian Health, Edison, New Jersey (SC, TKF); Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey (SC, TKF); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York (LDW); Department Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York (CV); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, White Plains, New York (MO-P, AFA); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx, New York (MO-P); Montefiore Health System, The Bronx, New York (MO-P); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California (DPK); Department of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation, and Sports Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico (WRF); Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico (WRF); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston (UTHealth), Houston, Texas (GB); Shriners Hospital for Children in Houston, Houston, Texas (GB); TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas (GB); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina (VQCN); Carolinas Rehabilitation, Charlotte, North Carolina (VQCN); and Association of Academic Physiatrists Education Committee, Owing Mills, Maryland (VQCN)., Cuccurullo S, Weiss LD, Visco C, Oh-Park M, Karimi DP, Frontera WR, Fleming TK, Bosques G, Bhatnagar S, Ambrose AF, Nguyen VQC
المصدر: American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation [Am J Phys Med Rehabil] 2020 Apr; Vol. 99 (4), pp. 273-277.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8803677 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1537-7385 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 08949115 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: [Baltimore, MD] : Published by Williams & Wilkins for the Association of Academic Physiatrists, [c1988-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Clinical Competence/*standards , Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine/*ethics , Professionalism/*standards, Accreditation ; Education, Medical, Graduate/standards ; Humans ; Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine/education
مستخلص: Professionalism in medicine is universally embraced, and it is the foundation for core competencies in medical education, clinical practice, and research. Physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians must master a complex body of knowledge and use this to responsibly care for patients. Rehabilitation professionals work in various settings; however, each one must establish and maintain ethical standards consistent with the specialty and national standards. For example, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education lists professionalism as one of its six core competencies, which trainees must master. There is a growing interest in professionalism and some of the ethical issues that it encompasses. This report provides a general overview of professionalism. Future reports are needed, and there is an opportunity to consider many facets of professionalism in greater detail.
References: Janczukowicz J, Rees CE: Preclinical medical students’ understandings of academic and medical professionalism: visual analysis of mind maps. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015897.
May WF: Beleagured Rulers: The Public Obligation of the Professional. Louisville, KY, Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.
Tsou AY, Creutzfeldt CJ, Gordon JM: The good doctor: professionalism in the 21st century. Handb Clin Neurol 2013;118:119–32.
Honesty/ethics in professions. Gallup, Inc. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1654/honesty-ethics-professions.aspx. Published 2019. Accessed March 28, 2019.
Talbott JA, Mallott DB: Professionalism, medical humanism, and clinical bioethics: the new wave-does psychiatry have a role? J Psychiatr Pract 2006;12:384–90.
Team NK: Exploring the ACGME core competencies (Part 1 of 7). Massachusetts Medical Society. Available at: https://knowledgeplus.nejm.org/blog/exploring-acgme-core-competencies/. Published 2019. Accessed March 28, 2019.
Cruess RL, Cruess SR: Teaching professionalism: general principles. Med Teach 2006;28:205–8.
ABIM Foundation. American Board of Internal Medicine; ACP-ASIM Foundation. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine; European Federation of Internal Medicine: Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:243–6.
Stern DT, Papadakis M: The developing physician—becoming a professional. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1794–9.
Pasquina PF, Kelly S, Hawkins RE: Assessing clinical competence in physical medicine & rehabilitation residency programs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:473–8.
Papadakis MA, Arnold GK, Blank LL, et al.: Performance during internal medicine residency training and subsequent disciplinary action by state licensing boards. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:869–76.
Engelhard C, Leugers R, Stephan J: Effectiveness of pre-admission data and letters of recommendation to predict students who will need professional behavior intervention during clinical rotations in the United States. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2016;13:26.
DeLisa JA, Foye PM, Jain SS, et al.: Measuring professionalism in a physiatry residency training program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:225–9.
Musick DW, Bockenek WL, Massagli TL, et al.: Reliability of the physical medicine and rehabilitation resident observation and competency assessment tool: a multi-institution study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2010;89:235–44.
Weeger S, Farin E: The effect of the patient-physician relationship on health-related quality of life after cardiac rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2017;39:468–76.
Faller H: Shared decision making: An approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation [in German]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2003;42:129–35.
Moroz A, Prufer N, Rosen Z, et al.: Important qualities in physiatrists: perceptions of rehabilitation team members and patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:812–6.
Sliwa JA, Makoul G, Betts H: Rehabilitation-specific communication skills training: improving the physician-patient relationship. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:126–32.
Medina-Mirapeix F, Oliveira-Sousa S, Sobral-Ferreira M, et al.: Continuity of rehabilitation services in post-acute care from the ambulatory outpatients’ perspective: a qualitative study. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:58–64.
Gage B, Stineman M, Deutsch A, et al.: Perspectives on the state-of-the-science in rehabilitation medicine and its implications for Medicare postacute care policies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1737–9.
Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, et al.: Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003;327:1219–21.
Siegler M: A legacy of Osler. Teaching clinical ethics at the bedside. JAMA 1978;239:951–6.
Sliwa JA, McPeak L, Gittler M, et al.: Clinical ethics in rehabilitation medicine: core objectives and algorithm for resident education. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:708–17.
Fox E, Myers S, Pearlman RA: Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey. Am J Bioeth 2007;7:13–25.
Howell BA, Kristal RB, Whitmire LR, et al.: A systematic review of advocacy curricula in graduate medical education. J Gen Intern Med 2019;34:2592–601.
Shanafelt TD, Schein E, Minor LB, et al.: Healing the professional culture of medicine. Mayo Clin Proc 2019;94:1556–66.
Silver JK, Bean AC, Slocum C, et al.: Physician workforce disparities and patient care: a narrative review. Health Equity 2019;3:360–77.
Sliwa JA, Clark GS, Chiodo A, et al.: Burnout in diplomates of the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation-prevalence and potential drivers: a prospective cross-sectional survey. PM R 2019;11:83–9.
Sharma R, Molinares-Mejia D, Khanna A, et al.: Training and practice patterns in cancer rehabilitation: a survey of physiatrists specializing in oncology care. PM R 2020;12:180–5.
Silver JK, Bhatnagar S: Physician burnout in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): should we focus more on physiatrists’ mission? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017;96:e159–61.
FitzGerald C, Hurst S: Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 2017;18:19.
Silver JK, Rowe M, Sinha MS, et al.: Micro-inequities in medicine. PM R 2018;10:1106–14.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Washington, DC, The National Academies Press, 2018.
Tabak LA, Valantine HA, Wolinetz CD: Update on NIH policies/approaches to prevent and address sexual harassment. National Institutes of Health. Available at: https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/presentations/12132018HarassmentPolicy.pdf. Published 2018. Accessed March 28, 2019.
Silver JK, Cuccurullo SJ, Ambrose AF, et al.: Association of Academic Physiatrists women’s task force report. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2018;97:680–90.
Definition of research misconduct. US Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconduct. Accessed March 28, 2019.
Promoting integrity in research and its publication. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Available at: https://publicationethics.org/. Published 2019. Accessed March 28, 2019.
Fanelli D: How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One 2009;4:e5738.
Institute of Medicine: Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington DC, The National Academies Press, 2009.
Davidoff F, DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, et al.: Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1178–80.
Physician financial transparency reports (Sunshine Act). American Medical Association. Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/medicare/physician-financial-transparency-reports-sunshine-act. Accessed March 28, 2019.
Open payments program year 2017 fact sheet. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/OpenPayments/Downloads/2017-fact-sheet.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed March 28, 2019.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20191015 Date Completed: 20200514 Latest Revision: 20210202
رمز التحديث: 20221213
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001322
PMID: 31609732
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1537-7385
DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000001322