دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Analysis of the Gut Microbiome of Wild and Captive Père David's Deer.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Analysis of the Gut Microbiome of Wild and Captive Père David's Deer.
المؤلفون: Sun CH; College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China., Liu HY; College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China., Liu B; College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.; Jiangsu Dafeng Père David's Deer National Nature Reserve, Yancheng, China., Yuan BD; College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.; College of Biology and Food, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu, China., Lu CH; College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
المصدر: Frontiers in microbiology [Front Microbiol] 2019 Oct 04; Vol. 10, pp. 2331. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 04 (Print Publication: 2019).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101548977 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1664-302X (Print) Linking ISSN: 1664302X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Front Microbiol Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Lausanne : Frontiers Research Foundation
مستخلص: Père David's deer ( Elaphurus davidianus or milu) is a highly endangered species originating from China, and many deer are currently being raised in captivity for gradual re-introduction to the wild. Wild and captive deer currently live in the same region but have vastly different diets. In this study, we used 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing to identify the healthy core microbiome in the gut of wild and captive Père David's deer and investigate how dietary factors influence the gut microbiome by comparing their differences. A core shared gut microbiome was identified in healthy Père David's deer, which was similar to that of other ruminants, mainly comprising the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. There were no differences in the richness or diversity of the gut microbiome between the wild and captive deer. However, PCA and ANOSIM demonstrated clear differences in the microbial community structure between the captive and wild deer, which mainly manifested as changes in the relative abundance of 39 bacterial genera. As the majority of these genera were not dominant in the deer gut, no significant difference was detected in functional modules related to the microbiome between the two groups. Therefore, the difference in dietary factors does not appear to affect the healthy core gut microbiome between captive and wild Père David's deer, suggesting strong co-evolution and the possibility of re-establishment in the wild. These data could guide future applications of population management in Père David's deer conservation.
(Copyright © 2019 Sun, Liu, Liu, Yuan and Lu.)
References: PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Apr;5(4):e1000352. (PMID: 19360128)
J Wildl Dis. 2014 Oct;50(4):942-5. (PMID: 25050802)
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Jul;31(7):539-549. (PMID: 27039196)
Int J Genomics. 2016;2016:5304028. (PMID: 27195280)
Environ Microbiol. 2013 Apr;15(4):1132-45. (PMID: 23145888)
Gut Microbes. 2011 May-Jun;2(3):178-82. (PMID: 21646867)
Front Microbiol. 2014 Oct 13;5:508. (PMID: 25352835)
Can J Microbiol. 2009 Dec;55(12):1335-46. (PMID: 20029525)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 May;77(9):2992-3001. (PMID: 21378055)
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6. (PMID: 23193283)
MBio. 2017 Jan 24;8(1):. (PMID: 28119466)
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63. (PMID: 21903629)
J Anim Sci. 2014 Feb;92(2):683-94. (PMID: 24352967)
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Nov;62(2):142-60. (PMID: 17892477)
Digestion. 2016;93(3):176-81. (PMID: 26859303)
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2011 Jan 01;16:1768-86. (PMID: 21196263)
Nat Commun. 2014 Jul 29;5:4500. (PMID: 25072318)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Aug;80(15):4650-8. (PMID: 24837385)
Genome Biol. 2011 Jun 24;12(6):R60. (PMID: 21702898)
mSystems. 2017 Jan 17;2(1):. (PMID: 28144631)
BMC Microbiol. 2009 Dec 15;9:259. (PMID: 20003481)
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Sep;31(9):814-21. (PMID: 23975157)
Microb Biotechnol. 2017 May;10(3):541-554. (PMID: 28165194)
Evol Appl. 2019 Jan 03;12(3):622-635. (PMID: 30828378)
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Aug;98(8):5572-87. (PMID: 26051320)
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 07;6:27297. (PMID: 27272326)
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6. (PMID: 20383131)
Microbiologyopen. 2018 Dec 27;:e786. (PMID: 30592177)
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 12;9:1258. (PMID: 29946310)
Front Microbiol. 2018 Feb 16;9:235. (PMID: 29503637)
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200. (PMID: 21700674)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: 16S rRNA; Père David’s deer; dietary factor; gut microbiome; population management
سلسلة جزيئية: figshare 10.6084/m9.figshare.8039915
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20191023 Latest Revision: 20200930
رمز التحديث: 20221213
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC6787558
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02331
PMID: 31636626
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1664-302X
DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02331