دورية أكاديمية

Guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Oncologic Surgery for pelvic exenteration in the treatment of cervical cancer.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Oncologic Surgery for pelvic exenteration in the treatment of cervical cancer.
المؤلفون: Laporte GA; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Zanini LAG; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Zanvettor PH; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Oliveira AF; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Bernado E; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Lissa F; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Coelho MJP; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Ribeiro R; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Araujo RLC; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Barrozo AJJ; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., da Costa AF; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., de Barros Júnior AP; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Lopes A; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Santos APM; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Azevedo BRB; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Sarmento BJQ; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Marins CAM; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Loureiro CMB; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Galhardo CAV; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Gatelli CN; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Quadros CA; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Pinto CV; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Uchôa DNAO; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Martins DRS; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Doria-Filho E; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Ribeiro EKMA; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Pinto ERF; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Dos Santos EAS; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Gozi FAM; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Nascimento FC; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Fernandes FG; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Gomes FKL; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Nascimento GJS; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Cucolicchio GO; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Ritt GF; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., de Oliveira GG; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Ayala GP; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Guimarães GC; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Ianaze GC; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Gobetti GA; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Medeiros GM; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Güth GZ; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Neto HFC; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Figueiredo HF; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Simões JC; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Ferrari JC; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Furtado JPR; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Vieira LJ; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Pereira LF; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., de Almeida LCF; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Tayeh MRA; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Figueiredo PHM; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Pereira RSAV; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Macedo RO; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Sacramento RMM; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Cardoso RM; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Zanatto RM; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Martinho RAM; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Araújo RG; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Pinheiro RN; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Reis RJ; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Goiânia SBS; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Costa SRP; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Foiato TF; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Silva TC; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Carneiro VCG; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Oliveira VR; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Casteleins WA; Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
المصدر: Journal of surgical oncology [J Surg Oncol] 2020 Apr; Vol. 121 (5), pp. 718-729. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 27.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Practice Guideline
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wiley-Liss Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0222643 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1096-9098 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00224790 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Surg Oncol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: <2005-> : Hoboken, NJ : Wiley-Liss
Original Publication: New York, Plenum.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Pelvic Exenteration/*standards , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*surgery, Anastomosis, Surgical ; Brazil ; Colostomy/methods ; Diagnostic Imaging ; Drainage ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Lymph Node Excision ; Nutrition Assessment ; Ostomy ; Palliative Care ; Pelvic Floor/surgery ; Peritoneal Lavage ; Postoperative Care ; Preoperative Care ; Societies, Medical ; Surgical Flaps ; Urinary Catheters ; Urinary Reservoirs, Continent ; Vagina/surgery ; Video Recording
مستخلص: Background and Objectives: The primary treatment for locally advanced cases of cervical cancer is chemoradiation followed by high-dose brachytherapy. When this treatment fails, pelvic exenteration (PE) is an option in some cases. This study aimed to develop recommendations for the best management of patients with cervical cancer undergoing salvage PE.
Methods: A questionnaire was administered to all members of the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology. Of them, 68 surgeons participated in the study and were divided into 10 working groups. A literature review of studies retrieved from the National Library of Medicine database was carried out on topics chosen by the participants. These topics were indications for curative and palliative PE, preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of tumor resectability, access routes and surgical techniques, PE classification, urinary, vaginal, intestinal, and pelvic floor reconstructions, and postoperative follow-up. To define the level of evidence and strength of each recommendation, an adapted version of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Health Service rating system was used.
Results: Most conducts and management strategies reviewed were strongly recommended by the participants.
Conclusions: Guidelines outlining strategies for PE in the treatment of persistent or relapsed cervical cancer were developed and are based on the best evidence available in the literature.
(© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
References: Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA. 2018;68:394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.
INCA. Estimativa 2018: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva; 2018.
Teixeira J, Maestri C, Machado H, Zeferino L, Carvalho N. Cervical cancer registered in two developed regions from Brazil: upper limit of reachable results from opportunistic screening. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40:347-353. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1660841.
Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143(Suppl 2):22-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12611.
Rema P, Mathew AP, Suchetha S, Ahmed I. Salvage surgery for cervical cancer recurrences. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017;8:146-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-015-0472-2.
Lin AJ, Ma S, Markovina S, et al. Clinical outcomes after isolated pelvic failure in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiation. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;153:530-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.104.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Guidelines: Colon Cancer. NCCN 2018:1 to 832. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician&#95;gls/default.aspx.
Berek JS, Howe C, Lagasse LD, Hacker NF. Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancy: survival and morbidity analysis of the 45-year experience at UCLA. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:153-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.034.
Peiretti M, Zapardiel I, Zanagnolo V, Landoni F, Morrow CP, Maggioni A. Management of recurrent cervical cancer: a review of the literature. Surg Oncol. 2012;21:e59-e66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2011.12.008.
Fotopoulou C, Neumann U, Kraetschell R, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of pelvic exenteration in patients with advanced gynecological malignancies. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:507-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21518.
Landoni F, Zanagnolo V, Rosenberg PG, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to pelvic exenteration in patients with recurrent cervical cancer: single institution experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130:69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.038.
Höckel M. Long-term experience with (laterally) extended endopelvic resection (LEER) in relapsed pelvic malignancies. Curr Oncol Rep. 2015;17:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-014-0435-8.
Höckel M. Laterally extended endopelvic resection. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91:369-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00502-x.
Guimarães GC, Baiocchi G, Ferreira FO, et al. Palliative pelvic exenteration for patients with gynecological malignancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283:1107-1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1544-8.
Schmidt AM, Imesch P, Fink D, Egger H. Indications and long-term clinical outcomes in 282 patients with pelvic exenteration for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:604-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.001.
Pathiraja P, Sandhu H, Instone M, Haldar K, Kehoe S. Should pelvic exenteration for symptomatic relief in gynaecology malignancies be offered? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289:657-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3023-5.
PelvEx Collaborative. Palliative pelvic exenteration: a systematic review of patient-centered outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:1787-1795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.011.
Sagebiel TL, Viswanathan C, Patnana M, Devine CE, Frumovitz M, Bhosale PR. Overview of the role of imaging in pelvic exenteration. Radiographics. 2015;35:1286-1294. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140127.
Brown AJ, Shah JS, Fleming ND, et al. Role of cervical cytology in surveillance after radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;142:283-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.030.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Guidelines: Cervical Cancer. NCCN 2019. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician&#95;gls/default.aspx.
Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL, Borstlap ACW, et al. Preoperative assessment of local tumor extent in advanced rectal cancer: CT or high-resolution MRI? Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:533-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002610000086.
Sasson AR, Sigurdson ER. Management of locally advanced rectal cancer. Surg Oncol. 2000;9:193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-7404(01)00012-3.
Diver EJ, Rauh-Hain JA, Del Carmen MG. Total pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/693535.
Grigsby PW. The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2008;8:146-155. https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0022.
Lakhman Y, Nougaret S, Miccò M, et al. Role of MR imaging and FDG PET/CT in selection and follow-up of patients treated with pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies. Radiographics. 2015;35:1295-1313. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140313.
Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D, et al. Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology. 2001;218:776-782. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr19776.
Lyell NJ, Kitano M, Smith B, et al. The effect of preoperative nutritional status on postoperative complications and overall survival in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration: a multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional cohort study. Am J Surg. 2019;218:275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.021.
Höckel M, Dornhöfer N. Pelvic exenteration for gynaecological tumours: achievements and unanswered questions. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:837-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70903-2.
Köhler C, Tozzi R, Possover M, Schneider A. Explorative laparoscopy prior to exenterative surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;86:311-315. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2002.6764.
Hope JM, Pothuri B. The role of palliative surgery in gynecologic cancer cases. The Oncologist. 2013;18:73-79. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0328.
Magrina JF, Stanhope CR, Weaver AL. Pelvic exenterations: supralevator, infralevator, and with vulvectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:130-135. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1996.4532.
Marnitz S, Köhler C, Müller M, Behrens K, Hasenbein K, Schneider A. Indications for primary and secondary exenterations in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:1023-1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.06.027.
Pawlik TM, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA. Pelvic exenteration for advanced pelvic malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:612-623. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.03.082.
Ferron G, Querleu D, Martel P, Letourneur B, Soulié M. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:551-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.09.027.
Pomel C, Castaigne D. Laparoscopic hand-assisted Miami Pouch following laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:543-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.021.
Puntambekar SP, Agarwal GA, Puntambekar SS, Sathe RM, Patil AM. Stretching the limits of laparoscopy in gynecological oncology: technical feasibility of doing a laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration for palliation in advanced cervical cancer. Int J Biomed Sci. 2009;5:17-22.
Goldberg GL, Sukumvanich P, Einstein MH, Smith HO, Anderson PS, Fields AL. Total pelvic exenteration: the Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Experience (1987 to 2003). Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:261-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.10.011.
Menahem B, Vallois A, Alves A, Lubrano J. Prophylactic pelvic drainage after rectal resection with extraperitoneal anastomosis: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:1531-1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2891-8.
Rondelli F, Bugiantella W, Vedovati MC, et al. To drain or not to drain extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:O35-O42. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12491.
Charoenkwan K, Kietpeerakool C. Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies. In: Charoenkwan K, ed. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010:CD007387. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007387.
Brunschwig A. The surgical treatment of cancer of the cervix uteri; a radical operation for cancer of the cervix. Bull NY Acad Med. 1948;24:672-683.
Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Benedetti-Panici P, et al. New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122:264-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.029.
Piver MS, Felix R. piver1975.pdf. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1974;44.
Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70074-3.
Schneider A, Köhler C, Erdemoglu E. Current developments for pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21:4-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32831c8436.
Kecmanovic DM, Pavlov MJ, Kovacevic PA, Sepetkovski AV, Ceranic MS, Stamenkovic AB. Management of advanced pelvic cancer by exenteration. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:743-746.
Vermaas M, Ferenschild FTJ, Verhoef C, et al. Total pelvic exenteration for primary locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:452-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.021.
Ungar L, Palfalvi L. Pelvic exenteration without external urinary or fecal diversion in gynecological cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:364-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00446.x.
Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W, et al. Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int. 2014;113:11-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12121.
Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Hafez K, et al. Urinary diversion. Urology. 2007;69:17-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.058.
Carter MF, Dalton DP, Garnett JE. Simultaneous diversion of the urinary and fecal streams utilizing a single abdominal stoma: the double-barreled wet colostomy. J Urol. 1989;141:1189-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41210-9.
Golda T, Biondo S, Kreisler E, Frago R, Fraccalvieri D, Millan M. Follow-up of double-barreled wet colostomy after pelvic exenteration at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:822-829. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181cf6cb2.
Guimaraes GC, Ferreira FO, Rossi BM, et al. Double-barreled wet colostomy is a safe option for simultaneous urinary and fecal diversion. Analysis of 56 procedures from a single institution. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:206-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20442.
Lopes de Queiroz F, Barbosa-Silva T, Pyramo Costa LM, et al. Double-barrelled wet colostomy with simultaneous urinary and faecal diversion: results in 9 patients and review of the literature. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:353-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00952.x.
Onodera H, Nagayama S, Mori A, Fujimoto A, Tachibana T, Yonenaga Y. Reappraisal of surgical treatment for radiation enteritis. World J Surg. 2005;29:459-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7699-3.
Pavlov MJ, Ceranic MS, Nale DP, Latincic SM, Kecmanovic DM. Double-barreled wet colostomy versus ileal conduit and terminal colostomy for urinary and fecal diversion: a single institution experience. Scand J Surg. 2014;103:189-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496913509982.
Oliveira Poletto AH, Lopes A, Carvalho AL, et al. Pelvic exenteration and sphincter preservation: an analysis of 96 cases. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86:122-127. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20063.
Guimarães GC, Neto GB, Rossi BM. Reconstruction of urinary and gastrointestinal tracts in patients. Appl Cancer Res. 2005;25:204-208.
Herdiman O, Ong K, Johnson L, Lawrentschuk N. Orthotopic bladder substitution (neobladder): Part II. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013;40:171-180. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e31827e8499 quiz E1-2.
Stein R, Schröder A, Thüroff JW. Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion in patients with neurogenic bladder: surgical considerations. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8:153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.11.014.
Meyer JP, Drake B, Boorer J, Gillatt D, Persad R, Fawcett D. A three-centre experience of orthotopic neobladder reconstruction after radical cystectomy: initial results. BJU Int. 2004;94:1317-1321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05164.x.
Penalver MA, Bejany DE, Averette HE, Donato DM, Sevin BU, Suarez G. Continent urinary diversion in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;34:274-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(89)90159-5.
Salom EM, Mendez LE, Schey D, et al Continent ileocolonic urinary reservoir (Miami pouch): The University of Miami experience over 15 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 190. Mosby Inc; 2004:994-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.023.
Davis NF, Burke JP, McDermott T, Flynn R, Manecksha RP, Thornhill JA. Bricker versus Wallace anastomosis: a meta-analysis of ureteroenteric stricture rates after ileal conduit urinary diversion. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9:284. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2692.
Siddiqui KM, Izawa JI. Ileal conduit: standard urinary diversion for elderly patients undergoing radical cystectomy. World J Urol. 2016;34:19-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1706-1.
Gin GE, Ruel NH, Parihar JS, et al. Ureteroenteric anastomotic revision as initial management of stricture after urinary diversion. Int J Urol. 2017;24:390-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13323.
Hu W, Su B, Xiao B, et al. Simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endoscopic treatment of non-malignant ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures following urinary diversion. BMC Urol. 2017;17:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0252-0.
Mullins JK, Guzzo TJ, Ball MW, et al. Ureteral stents placed at the time of urinary diversion decreases postoperative morbidity. Urol Int. 2012;88:66-70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000335212.
Mattei A, Birkhaeuser FD, Baermann C, Warncke SH, Studer UE. To stent or not to stent perioperatively the ureteroileal anastomosis of ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes and ileal conduits? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol. 2008;179:582-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.066.
Varkarakis IM, Delis A, Papatsoris A, Deliveliotis C. Use of external ureteral catheters and internal double J stents in a modified ileal neobladder for continent diversion: a comparative analysis. Urol Int. 2005;75:139-143. https://doi.org/10.1159/000087168.
Carlson JW, Soisson AP, Fowler JM, Carter JR, Twiggs LB, Carson LF. Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for primary vaginal reconstruction. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51:323-329. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1993.1298.
Hatch KD. Neovaginal reconstruction. Cancer. 1993;71:1660-1663. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.2820710433.
Heath PM, Woods JE, Podratz KC, Arnold PG, Irons GB. Gracilis myocutaneous vaginal reconstruction. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59:21-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(12)60337-1.
Mirhashemi R, Averette HE, Lambrou N, et al. Vaginal reconstruction at the time of pelvic exenteration: a surgical and psychosexual analysis of techniques. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87:39-45. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2002.6780.
Moraru DC, Scripcariu V. Decisional algorithms for the reconstruction of pelviperineal defects after total pelvic exenteration: a review. Jurnalul de Chirurgie. 2018;14:14. https://doi.org/10.7438/1584-9341-14-1-3.
Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ. Vaginal reconstruction: an algorithm approach to defect classification and flap reconstruction. J Surg Oncol. 2006;94:515-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20489.
D'Souza DN. Vaginal reconstruction following resection of primary locally advanced and recurrent colorectal malignancies. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1340-1343. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1340.
Kaartinen IS, Vuento MH, Hyöty MK, Kallio J, Kuokkanen HO. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor and the vagina after total pelvic exenteration using the transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68:93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.08.059.
Andersen BL, Hacker NF. Psychosexual adjustment following pelvic exenteration. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:331-338.
Corney RH, Crowther ME, Everett H, Howells A, Shepherd JH. Psychosexual dysfunction in women with gynaecological cancer following radical pelvic surgery. BJOG. 1993;100:73-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12955.x.
Fotopoulou C, Neumann U, Klapp C, Lichtenegger W, Sehouli J. Long-term effects of neovaginal reconstruction with sigmoid loop technique on sexual function and self image in patients with gynecologic malignancies: results of a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:400-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.018.
Franz RC. Sigmoid colon vaginoplasty: a modified method. BJOG. 1996;103:1148-1155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09599.x.
McCraw JB, Massey FM, Shanklin KD, Horton CE. Vaginal reconstruction with gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58:176-183. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197608000-00006.
Copeland LJ, Hancock KC, Gershenson DM, Stringer CA, Atkinson EN, Edwards CL. Gracilis myocutaneous vaginal reconstruction concurrent with total pelvic exenteration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:1095-1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(89)90168-3.
Jurado M, Bazán A, Elejabeitia J, Paloma V, Martínez-Monge R, Alćzar JL. Primary vaginal and pelvic floor reconstruction at the time of pelvic exenteration: a study of morbidity. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77:293-297. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2000.5764.
Pursell SH, Day TG, Tobin GR. Distally based rectus abdominis flap for reconstruction in radical gynecologic procedures. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;37:234-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(90)90339-M.
den Dulk M, Marijnen CAM, Collette L, et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1066-1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6694.
Hatch KD, Gelder MS, Soong S, Baker VV, Shingleton HM. Pelvic exenteration with low rectal anastomosis: survival, complications, and prognostic factors. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;38:462-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(90)90092-Y.
Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J. Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:662-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12618.
Qu H, Liu Y, Bi D. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:3608-3617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4117-x.
Brennan SS, Pickford IR, Evans M, Pollock AV. Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses-a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg. 1982;69:722-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800691212.
Harris WJ, Wheeless CR. Use of the end-to-end anastomosis stapling device in low colorectal anastomosis associated with radical gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 1986;23:350-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(86)90137-X.
Lim S-W, Lim S-B, Park J-Y, Park SY, Choi HS, Jeong SY. Outcomes of colorectal anastomoses during pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy. Br J Surg. 2008;95:770-773. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6135.
Neutzling CB, Lustosa SA, Proenca IM, da Silva EM, Matos D. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003144.
Gu WL, Wu SW. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evidence based on thirteen studies. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-014-0417-1.
Lago V, Fotopoulou C, Chiantera V, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection in ovarian cancer surgery: a multi-centre study. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;153:549-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.241.
Zhou X, Wang B, Li F, Wang J, Fu W. Risk factors associated with nonclosure of defunctioning stomas after sphincter-preserving low anterior resection of rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:544-554. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000819.
Chen J, Wang DR, Zhang JR, Li P, Niu G, Lu Q. Meta-analysis of temporary ileostomy versus colostomy for colorectal anastomoses. Acta Chirurgica Belgica. 2013;113:330-339.
Gavriilidis P, Azoulay D, Taflampas P. Loop transverse colostomy versus loop ileostomy for defunctioning of colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review, updated conventional meta-analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis. Surg Today. 2019;49:108-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-018-1708-x.
Güenaga KF, Lustosa SAS, Saad SS, Saconato H, Matos D. Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. 2008;23:294-303. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502008000300014.
Sparreboom CL, van Groningen JT, Lingsma HF, et al. Different risk factors for early and late colorectal anastomotic leakage in a nationwide audit. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61:1258-1266. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001202.
Yin TC, Tsai HL, Yang PF, et al. Early closure of defunctioning stoma increases complications related to stoma closure after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1149-9.
Brodbeck R, Horch RE, Arkudas A, Beier JP. Plastic and reconstructive surgery in the treatment of oncological perineal and genital defects. Front Oncol. 2015;5:5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00212.
Campbell CA, Butler CE. Use of adjuvant techniques improves surgical outcomes of complex vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstructions of pelvic cancer defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:447-458. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e6fd2.
Devulapalli C, Jia Wei AT, DiBiagio JR, et al. Primary versus flap closure of perineal defects following oncologic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1602-1613. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002107.
Hultman CS, Sherrill MA, Halvorson EG, et al. Utility of the omentum in pelvic floor reconstruction following resection of anorectal malignancy: patient selection, technical caveats, and clinical outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181ce3947.
Mericli AF, Martin JP, Campbell CA. An algorithmic anatomical subunit approach to pelvic wound reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1004-1017. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000479973.45051.b6.
Miyamoto Y, Akiyama T, Sakamoto Y, et al. Omental flap after pelvic exenteration for pelvic cancer. Surg Today. 2016;46:1471-1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1348-y.
Sheckter CC, Shakir A, Vo H, Tsai J, Nazerali R, Lee GK. Reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection (APR): indications and complications from a single institution experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:1506-1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.024.
Sagebiel TL, Faria SC, Aparna Balachandran B, Sacks JM, You YN, Bhosale PR. Pelvic reconstruction with omental and VRAM flaps: anatomy, surgical technique, normal postoperative findings, and complications. Radiographics. 2011;31:2005-2019. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.317115112.
Cibula D, Pötter R, Planchamp F, et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Cervical Cancer. Virchows Arch. 2018;472:919-936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2362-9.
Nobbenhuis MAE, Balasubramani L, Kolomainen DF, Barton DPJ. Surgical management and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer: survey of gynaecological oncologists in the UK. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32:576-579. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2012.694510.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: cervical cancer; pelvic exenteration; surgery; treatment
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20191129 Date Completed: 20200323 Latest Revision: 20200323
رمز التحديث: 20221213
DOI: 10.1002/jso.25759
PMID: 31777095
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.25759