دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Interbreed variation in meiotic recombination rate and distribution in the domestic chicken Gallus gallus .

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Interbreed variation in meiotic recombination rate and distribution in the domestic chicken Gallus gallus .
المؤلفون: Malinovskaya LP; Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia., Tishakova KV; Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia., Volkova NA; L. K. Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitsy, 142132, Russia., Torgasheva AA; Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia., Tsepilov YA; Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia., Borodin PM; Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
المصدر: Archives animal breeding [Arch Anim Breed] 2019 Jul 10; Vol. 62 (2), pp. 403-411. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jul 10 (Print Publication: 2019).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Copernicus Publications Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 101701238 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2363-9822 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00039438 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Arch Anim Breed Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Göttingen : Copernicus Publications.
مستخلص: The efficiency of natural and artificial selection is critically dependent on the recombination rate. However, interbreed and individual variation in recombination rate in poultry remains unknown. Conventional methods of analysis of recombination such as genetic linkage analysis, sperm genotyping and chiasma count at lampbrush chromosomes are expensive and time-consuming. In this study, we analyzed the number and distribution of recombination nodules in spermatocytes of the roosters of six chicken breeds using immunolocalization of key proteins involved in chromosome pairing and recombination. We revealed significant effects of breed ( R 2 = 0.17 ; p < 0.001 ) and individual ( R 2 = 0.28 ; p < 0.001 ) on variation in the number of recombination nodules. Both interbreed and individual variations in recombination rate were almost entirely determined by variation in recombination density on macrochromosomes, because almost all microchromosomes in each breed had one recombination nodule. Despite interbreed differences in the density of recombination nodules, the patterns of their distribution along homologous chromosomes were similar. The breeds examined in this study showed a correspondence between the age of the breed and its recombination rate. Those with high recombination rates (Pervomai, Russian White and Brahma) are relatively young breeds created by crossing several local breeds. The breeds displaying low recombination rate are ancient local breeds: Cochin (Indo-China), Brown Leghorn (Tuscany, Italy) and Russian Crested (the European part of Russia).
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
(Copyright: © 2019 Lyubov P. Malinovskaya et al.)
References: Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 25;280(1771):20131945. (PMID: 24068360)
Science. 2009 Apr 24;324(5926):528-32. (PMID: 19390050)
Plant Cell. 2009 Dec;21(12):3915-25. (PMID: 20040539)
Heredity (Edinb). 1994 Jan;72 ( Pt 1):64-8. (PMID: 8119830)
Chromosome Res. 1997 Feb;5(1):66-8. (PMID: 9088645)
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001;95(3-4):129-33. (PMID: 12063388)
Chromosome Res. 2016 Sep;24(3):325-38. (PMID: 27136937)
Nat Genet. 2004 Nov;36(11):1203-6. (PMID: 15467721)
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Dec;71(6):1353-68. (PMID: 12432495)
BMC Genet. 2010 Feb 08;11:11. (PMID: 20141624)
Genetics. 2016 May;203(1):583-98. (PMID: 27029733)
Trends Genet. 2001 Sep;17(9):481-5. (PMID: 11525814)
Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269-94. (PMID: 5980116)
Genome. 2001 Jun;44(3):439-43. (PMID: 11444703)
Heredity (Edinb). 1991 Jun;66 ( Pt 3):453-8. (PMID: 1880050)
Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1569-79. (PMID: 10101178)
Science. 2015 Nov 20;350(6263):928-32. (PMID: 26586757)
Evolution. 2001 Oct;55(10):1921-31. (PMID: 11761054)
Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Sep;63(3):861-9. (PMID: 9718341)
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Jul 4;49(1):55. (PMID: 28676070)
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Jan 20;12:27. (PMID: 21251248)
Genetics. 2002 Sep;162(1):297-306. (PMID: 12242241)
Chromosome Res. 2006;14(6):605-12. (PMID: 16964567)
J Virol. 2006 Nov;80(22):11124-40. (PMID: 16956935)
Genetics. 1999 Jan;151(1):239-49. (PMID: 9872963)
Genome Res. 2009 Mar;19(3):510-9. (PMID: 19088305)
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Jun 22;48(1):44. (PMID: 27335010)
Genetics. 2011 Mar;187(3):643-57. (PMID: 21149647)
Genes Genet Syst. 1999 Oct;74(5):209-10. (PMID: 10734602)
Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Dec;107(6):496-508. (PMID: 21673743)
Chromosoma. 2017 Oct;126(5):615-631. (PMID: 28101670)
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;117(1-4):64-77. (PMID: 17675846)
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20321. (PMID: 21698098)
Theor Appl Genet. 1992 Aug;84(5-6):640-2. (PMID: 24201352)
Nature. 1999 Sep 23;401(6751):344. (PMID: 10517631)
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Dec;18(12):2323-6. (PMID: 11719582)
PLoS Genet. 2011 Jun;7(6):e1002116. (PMID: 21695226)
Evolution. 2008 Feb;62(2):276-94. (PMID: 18067567)
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2016;150(2):128-138. (PMID: 28030854)
Genomics. 2008 Jan;91(1):12-21. (PMID: 18060738)
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(7):e1002854. (PMID: 22844258)
Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1415-27. (PMID: 10880499)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20191207 Latest Revision: 20240722
رمز التحديث: 20240722
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC6859913
DOI: 10.5194/aab-62-403-2019
PMID: 31807651
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2363-9822
DOI:10.5194/aab-62-403-2019