دورية أكاديمية
A cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
| العنوان: | A cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Vicente E; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Núñez-Alfonsel J; Instituto de Validación de la Eficiencia Clínica (IVEC), Fundación de Investigación HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Ielpo B; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Ferri V; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Caruso R; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Duran H; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Diaz E; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Malave L; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Fabra I; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Pinna E; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Isernia R; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain., Hidalgo A; Department of Economic Analysis and Finances, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain., Quijano Y; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain. |
| المصدر: | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS [Int J Med Robot] 2020 Apr; Vol. 16 (2), pp. e2080. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 11. |
| نوع المنشور: | Comparative Study; Journal Article; Observational Study |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101250764 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1478-596X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14785951 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Med Robot Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: 2006- : West Sussex, England : Wiley Original Publication: Ilkley, UK : Robotic Publications, c2004- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Laparoscopy/*economics , Pancreas/*surgery , Pancreatectomy/*economics , Robotic Surgical Procedures/*economics, Adult ; Aged ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Pancreatectomy/methods ; Prospective Studies ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Reproducibility of Results ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods ; Surveys and Questionnaires |
| مستخلص: | Aim: There is no study in the literature that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). We performed a comparative study of RDP and LDP with the aim of evaluating clinical and cost-effective outcomes. Material and Methods: This is an observational, comparative prospective nonrandomized study. The primary end point was to compare the cost-effectiveness differences between both groups. A willingness to pay of €20 000 and €30 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was used as a threshold to recognize which treatment was most cost-effective. Results: A total of 31 RDP and 28 LDP have been included. The overall mean total cost was similar in both groups (RDP: €9712.15 versus LDP: €9424.68; P > .5). Mean QALYs for RDP (0.652) was higher than that associated with LDP (0.59) (P > .5). Conclusion: This study seems to provide data of cost-effectiveness between RDP and LDP approaches, showing some benefits for RDP. (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.) |
| References: | Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the accordion severity grading system. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(6):810-819. Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, et al. Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2014;10:280-285. Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:18-27. Hanna EM, Rozario N, Rupp C, Sindram D, Iannitti DA, Martinie JB. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: lessons learned and predictors for conversion. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2013;9:152-159. Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg. 2013;257:128-132. Zhou JY, Xin C, Mou YP, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e015. Butturini G, Damoli I, Crepaz L, et al. A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(11):3163-3170. Ielpo B, Caruso R, Duran H, et al. Robotic versus standard open pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis comparison. Updates Surg. 2018 Mar 26;71:137-144. Souche R, Herrero A, Bourel G, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3562-3569. Lyman WB, Passeri M, Sastry A, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-volume, minimally invasive center. Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov 12;33:2991-3000. Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc. 2011;25(6):2004-2009. Fisher AV, Fernandes-Taylor S, Schumacher JR, et al. Analysis of 90 day cost for open versus minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2019 Jan;21(1):60-66. Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, et al. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery. 2010;148:814-823. Rodriguez M, Memeo R, Leon P, et al. Which method of distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018 Oct;7(5):345-352. Magge DR, Zenati MS, Hamad A, et al. Comprehensive comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness and perioperative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2018 Dec;20(12):1172-1180. Lin XC, Huang HG, Chen YC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective single-center study. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 1;57(2):102-107. Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS)-explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Heal. 2013;16(2):e1-e5. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-213. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8-13. Vilagut G, Ferrer M, Rajmil L, et al. El Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos. Gac Sanit. 2005;19(2):135-150. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Developing NICE guidelines: the manual; 2014. Bencini L, Annecchiarico M, Farsi M, et al. Minimally invasive surgical approach to pancreatic malignancies. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;7:411-421. Conlon KC, de Rooij T, van Hilst J, et al. Minimally invasive pancreatic resections: cost and value perspectives. HPB. 2017;19(3):225-233. Lai EC, Tang CN. Robotic distal pancreatectomy versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study for short-term outcomes. Front Med. 2015;9(3):356-360. Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's experience in open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:18-27. Røsok BI, de Rooij T, van Hilst J, et al. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. HPB. 2017;19(3):205-214. Gurusamy KS, Riviere D, van Laarhoven CJH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189631. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD). Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):2-9. |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20200207 Date Completed: 20201208 Latest Revision: 20201214 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/rcs.2080 |
| PMID: | 32026577 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1478-596X |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1002/rcs.2080 |