دورية أكاديمية

Improved Outcomes for Responders After Treatment with Induction Chemotherapy and Chemo(re)irradiation for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Improved Outcomes for Responders After Treatment with Induction Chemotherapy and Chemo(re)irradiation for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.
المؤلفون: Voogt ELK; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. eva.voogt@catharinaziekenhuis.nl., van Zoggel DMGI; Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands., Kusters M; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands., Bloemen JG; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands., Peulen HMU; Department of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands., Creemers GJM; Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands., van Lijnschoten G; Pathology Department, PAMM Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands., Nederend J; Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands., Roef MJ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands., Burger JWA; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands., Rutten HJT; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
المصدر: Annals of surgical oncology [Ann Surg Oncol] 2020 Sep; Vol. 27 (9), pp. 3503-3513. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Mar 19.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9420840 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1534-4681 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10689265 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ann Surg Oncol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2005- : New York, NY : Springer
Original Publication: New York, NY : Raven Press, c1994-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Induction Chemotherapy*/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy*/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local*/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local*/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local*/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local*/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms*/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms*/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms*/radiotherapy , Rectal Neoplasms*/surgery, Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use ; Capecitabine/administration & dosage ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Fluorouracil/administration & dosage ; Humans ; Leucovorin/administration & dosage ; Male ; Margins of Excision ; Middle Aged ; Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage ; Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage ; Proctectomy/methods ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome
مستخلص: Background: Despite improvements in the multimodality treatment for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), oncological outcomes remain poor. This study evaluated the effect of induction chemotherapy and subsequent chemo(re)irradiation on the pathologic response and the rate of resections with clear margins (R0 resection) in relation to long-term oncological outcomes.
Methods: All consecutive patients with LRRC treated in the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven who underwent a resection after treatment with induction chemotherapy and subsequent chemo(re)irradiation between January 2010 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Induction chemotherapy consisted of CAPOX/FOLFOX. Endpoints were pathologic response, resection margin and overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and metastasis free survival (MFS).
Results: A pathologic complete response was observed in 22 patients (17%), a "good" response (Mandard 2-3) in 74 patients (56%), and a "poor" response (Mandard 4-5) in 36 patients (27%). An R0 resection was obtained in 83 patients (63%). The degree of pathologic response was linearly correlated with the R0 resection rate (p = 0.026). In patients without synchronous metastases, pathologic response was an independent predictor for LRFS, MFS, and DFS (p = 0.004, p = 0.003, and p = 0.024, respectively), whereas R0 resection was an independent predictor for LRFS and OS (p = 0.020 and p = 0.028, respectively).
Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy in addition to neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation is a promising treatment strategy for patients with LRRC with high pathologic response rates that translate into improved oncological outcomes, especially when an R0 resection has been achieved.
References: Bosman SJ, Holman FA, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Martijn H, Creemers GJ, Rutten HJT. Feasibility of reirradiation in the treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2014;101(10):1280–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9569 . (PMID: 10.1002/bjs.956925049111)
Van Der Meij W, Rombouts AJM, Rutten H, Bremers AJA, De Wilt JHW. Treatment of locally recurrent rectal carcinoma in previously (chemo)irradiated patients: a review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(2):148–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000547 . (PMID: 10.1097/DCR.000000000000054726734974)
Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(9):638–46. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMoa010580)
Nielsen MB, Laurberg S, Holm T. Current management of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Color Dis. 2011;13(7):732–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02167.x . (PMID: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02167.x)
Kusters M, Dresen RC, Martijn H, et al. Radicality of resection and survival after multimodality treatment is influenced by subsite of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75(5):1444–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.015 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.01519395199)
Westberg K, Palmer G, Hjern F, Johansson H, Holm T, Martling A. Management and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(1):100–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.013 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.01329224985)
Nielsen M, Rasmussen P, Pedersen B, Hagemann-Madsen R, Lindegaard J, Laurberg S. Early and late outcomes of surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: a prospective 10-year study in the total mesorectal excision era. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(8):2677–84. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4317-y . (PMID: 10.1245/s10434-014-4317-y25564165)
Valentini V, Morganti AG, Gambacorta MA, et al. Preoperative hyperfractionated chemoradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer in patients previously irradiated to the pelvis: a multicentric phase II study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.017 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.01716863927)
Dresen RC, Gosens MJ, Martijn H, et al. Radical resection after IORT-containing multimodality treatment is the most important determinant for outcome in patients treated for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9896-z . (PMID: 10.1245/s10434-008-9896-z183893212467498)
Alberda WJ, Verhoef C, Schipper MEI, et al. The importance of a minimal tumor-free resection margin in locally recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000388 . (PMID: 10.1097/DCR.000000000000038826200682)
Westberg K, Palmer G, Hjern F, et al. Population-based study of factors predicting treatment intention in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2017;104(13):1866–1873. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10645 . (PMID: 10.1002/bjs.1064529023631)
Tekkis P, Road F. Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):1009–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9192 . (PMID: 10.1002/bjs.9192)
Vermaas M, Ferenschild FTJ, Nuyttens JJME, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy improves outcome in recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(5):918–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0891-6 . (PMID: 10.1007/s10350-004-0891-615785886)
Wiig JN, Larsen SG, Dueland S, Giercksky KE. Clinical outcome in patients with complete pathologic response (pT0) to preoperative irradiation/chemo-irradiation operated for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2005;92:70–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20340 . (PMID: 10.1002/jso.2034016180215)
Yu SKT, Bhangu A, Tait DM, Tekkis P, Wotherspoon A, Brown G. Chemoradiotherapy response in recurrent rectal cancer. Cancer Med. 2014;3(1):111–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.169 . (PMID: 10.1002/cam4.16924403010)
van Zoggel DMGI, Bosman SJ, Kusters M, et al. Preliminary results of a cohort study of induction chemotherapy-based treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:447–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10694 . (PMID: 10.1002/bjs.1069429168556)
Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC, et al. Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer. 1994;73(11):2680–6. (PMID: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11<2680::AID-CNCR2820731105>3.0.CO;2-C)
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.5.0. National Cancer Institute. 2009. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic&#95;applications/docs/CTCAE&#95;v5&#95;Quick&#95;Reference&#95;5x7.pdf . Accessed 9 Dec 2019.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13. (PMID: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae)
Fernández-Martos C, Pericay C, Aparicio J, et al. Phase II, randomized study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with induction CAPOX followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in magnetic resonance imaging-defined, l. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(5):859–65. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8541 . (PMID: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.854120065174)
Chau I, Brown G, Cunningham D, et al. Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by synchronous chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision in magnetic resonance imaging-defined poor-risk rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(4):668–74. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.4875 . (PMID: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.487516446339)
Chua YJ, Barbachano Y, Cunningham D, et al. Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined poor-risk rectal cancer: a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(3):241–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70381-X . (PMID: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70381-X20106720)
Yu X, Wang QX, Xiao WW, et al. Neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine combined with bevacizumab plus radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of a single-institute phase II study. Cancer Commun (London, England). 2018;38(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-018-0294-z . (PMID: 10.1186/s40880-018-0294-z)
Cercek A, Goodman KA, Hajj C, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy first, followed by chemoradiation and then surgery, in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12(4):513–9. (PMID: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0056)
Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD, et al. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(8):957–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00004-2 . (PMID: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00004-2261877514670237)
26. Perez K, Safran H, Sikov W, et al. Complete neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer: The Brown University Oncology Group CONTRE study. Am J Clin Oncol Cancer Clin Trials. 2017;40(3):283–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000149 . (PMID: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000149)
27. Cercek A, Roxburgh CSD, Strombom P, et al. Adoption of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(6). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0071 . (PMID: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0071295661095885165)
Kusters M, Bosman SJ, Van Zoggel DMGI, et al. Local recurrence in the lateral lymph node compartment: improved outcomes with induction chemotherapy combined with multimodality treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(6):1883–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5098-2 . (PMID: 10.1245/s10434-016-5098-226842492)
PelvEx Collaborative. Factors affecting outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:650–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10734 . (PMID: 10.1002/bjs.10734)
Tanis PJ, Doeksen A, Van Lanschot JJB. Intentionally curative treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review. Can J Surg. 2013;56(2):135–44. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.025911 . (PMID: 10.1503/cjs.025911235176343617119)
Vecchio FM, Valentini V, Minsky BD, et al. The relationship of pathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) and outcomes after preoperative therapy in rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62(3):752–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.017 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.01715936556)
Peng YF, Yu WD, Pan H Da, et al. Tumor regression grades: Potential outcome predictor of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma after preoperative radiotherapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(6):1851–6. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1851 . (PMID: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1851256849514323462)
Mace AG, Pai RK, Stocchi L, Kalady MF. American joint committee on cancer and college of American pathologists regression grade: a new prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(1):32–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000266 . (PMID: 10.1097/DCR.000000000000026625489692)
34. Mancini R, Pattaro G, Diodoro MG, et al. Tumor regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery for low rectal cancer evaluated by multiple correspondence analysis: 10 years as minimum follow-up. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018;17(1):e13–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2017.06.004 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.06.00428865674)
35. Rödel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(34):8688–96. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1329 . (PMID: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.132916246976)
PelvEx Collaborative. Surgical and survival outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002528 . (PMID: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002528)
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Organoplatinum Compounds)
04ZR38536J (Oxaliplatin)
6804DJ8Z9U (Capecitabine)
Q573I9DVLP (Leucovorin)
U3P01618RT (Fluorouracil)
SCR Protocol: Folfox protocol
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20200321 Date Completed: 20210405 Latest Revision: 20211101
رمز التحديث: 20240513
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08362-4
PMID: 32193717
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-020-08362-4