دورية أكاديمية
Power, perspective, and privilege: The challenge of translating stakeholder theory from business management to environmental and natural resource management.
| العنوان: | Power, perspective, and privilege: The challenge of translating stakeholder theory from business management to environmental and natural resource management. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Colvin RM; Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, J.G. Crawford Building #132, Acton, ACT, 2602, Australia. Electronic address: Rebecca.Colvin@anu.edu.au., Witt GB; School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Chamberlain Building #35, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. Electronic address: bwitt@uq.edu.au., Lacey J; Responsible Innovation Future Science Platform, Commonwealth Scientific and Industry Research Organisation (CSIRO), Dutton Park, QLD, 4102, Australia. Electronic address: Justine.Lacey@csiro.au. |
| المصدر: | Journal of environmental management [J Environ Manage] 2020 Oct 01; Vol. 271, pp. 110974. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 22. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Academic Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0401664 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1095-8630 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03014797 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Environ Manage Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: London ; New York, Academic Press. |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Government* , Natural Resources* |
| مستخلص: | Stakeholder analysis and engagement is a central tenet for understanding and solving sustainability challenges, and is applied widely in environmental and natural resource management (ENRM). The practice in ENRM follows translation of stakeholder theory from its origins in business management to the sustainability sector. In this analytical essay we explore key concepts in ENRM research and practice to examine complexities that have accompanied this translation to ENRM. In particular, we consider the centrality of stakeholders' landscape perspectives in defining their stake in ENRM issues, and through this lens examine the limitations that are inherent in the classic 'hub-and-spoke' model of stakeholder analysis that is the theoretical underpinning for ENRM stakeholder analysis and engagement practice. We argue that unlike the traditional business context where both power and perspective are centred on the business entity that then defines other stakeholders in reference to itself, in ENRM, stakeholder relations are centred on an ENRM issue, typically a landscape or the implications of policy change on a landscape. As a consequence, decision-making power is decentred onto one of several stakeholders; often a government or other high power entity, implicitly conferring privilege to those powerful stakeholders' landscape perspectives over those held by low power stakeholders. We conclude with priorities for foregrounding power and explicating landscape perspectives to identify privilege in ENRM. We direct these insights especially to those ENRM actors who have the dual roles of adjudicator and privileged stakeholder such that they do not inadvertently perpetuate power imbalances through the privilege of aligning their decision-making power with their landscape perspectives. (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Decision-making; Engagement; Landscape preferences; Values |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20200625 Date Completed: 20200812 Latest Revision: 20200812 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110974 |
| PMID: | 32579526 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1095-8630 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110974 |