دورية أكاديمية
[Establishment of knowledge, attitude and practice evaluation system of nursing humanistic care].
| العنوان: | [Establishment of knowledge, attitude and practice evaluation system of nursing humanistic care]. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Li YQ; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China., Luan XR; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China., Li XY; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China., Chen YY; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China. |
| المصدر: | Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases [Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi] 2020 Jun 20; Vol. 38 (6), pp. 470-472. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | Chinese |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Tianjin shi lao dong wei sheng yan jiu suo ; Tianjin shi lao dong wei sheng huan jing yi xue hui Country of Publication: China NLM ID: 8410840 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1001-9391 (Print) Linking ISSN: 10019391 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: [Tientsin] : Tianjin shi lao dong wei sheng yan jiu suo ; Tianjin shi lao dong wei sheng huan jing yi xue hui, [1983- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice* , Nursing*, Delphi Technique ; Emotions ; Humans ; Referral and Consultation |
| مستخلص: | Objective: To construct a knowledge, attitude and practice evaluation system of nursing humanistic care, and to provide reference for improving nursing humanistic construction. Methods: Based on literature analysis, the draft evaluation system was sorted out, and two rounds of Delphi expert consultation were conducted on 28 experts, and the items were modified according to the consultation opinions. Results: The enthusiasm coefficients of the two rounds of consultation were 100% and 96.4%, the authority coefficients were 0.888 and 0.870, and the coordination coefficients were 0.342 and 0.467, respectively, which were statistically significant ( P <0.05) . The final evaluation system of humanistic care for clinical nursing staff includes 3 first-level indicators and 63 second-level indicators. Conclusion: The humanistic care evaluation system constructed in this study is scientific and practical and can be used as a scientific evaluation tool for the humanistic care ability of clinical nurses. |
| معلومات مُعتمدة: | 2016WS0342 Shandong Province Medicine Health Science and Techology Development Plan |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Delphi method; Humanistic care; Knowledge-attitude-practice; Nursing staff Local Abstract: [Publisher, Chinese] 目的： 构建临床护理人员人文关怀知信行评估体系，为完善护理人文建设提供参考依据。 方法： 基于文献分析法整理形成评估体系草案，对28名专家进行两轮德尔菲专家函询，根据函询意见对条目进行修改。 结果： 两轮函询专家的积极性系数分别为100%、96.4%，权威系数分别为0.888、0.870，协调系数分别为0.342、0.467，均有统计学意义（ P <0.05）。最终形成的临床护理人员人文关怀知信行评估体系包含一级指标3项和二级指标63项。 结论： 临床护理人员人文关怀评估体系具有一定的科学性和实用性，可作为临床护理人员人文关怀能力的科学评测工具。. |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20200707 Date Completed: 20201029 Latest Revision: 20201029 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240628 |
| DOI: | 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20191008-00463 |
| PMID: | 32629585 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
| تدمد: | 1001-9391 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20191008-00463 |