دورية أكاديمية

Comparison of Component Placement Accuracy Using Two Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Grid Technologies During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of Component Placement Accuracy Using Two Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Grid Technologies During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.
المؤلفون: Thorne TJ; John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI., Nishioka ST; Bone and Joint Center, Straub Medical Center, Honolulu, HI., Andrews SN; Bone and Joint Center, Straub Medical Center, Honolulu, HI; Department of Surgery, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI., Mathews KA; Bone and Joint Center, Straub Medical Center, Honolulu, HI., Nakasone CK; Bone and Joint Center, Straub Medical Center, Honolulu, HI; Department of Surgery, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI.
المصدر: The Journal of arthroplasty [J Arthroplasty] 2020 Dec; Vol. 35 (12), pp. 3601-3606. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 24.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Taylor and Francis Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8703515 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1532-8406 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 08835403 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Arthroplasty Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: New Brunswick, NJ : Taylor and Francis
Original Publication: [New York, NY : Churchill Livingstone, c1986-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip*/adverse effects , Hip Prosthesis*, Acetabulum/surgery ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies
مستخلص: Background: Intraoperative fluoroscopy is beneficial when performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach; however, image distortion may influence component placement. A manual gridding system (MGS) and a digital gridding system (DGS) are commercially available, aimed at visually representing or correcting image distortion. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare component placement accuracy following direct anterior approach THA when intraoperative fluoroscopy was supplemented with MGS or DGS.
Methods: A retrospective evaluation of acetabular cup abduction (ABD), leg length discrepancy (LLD) and global hip offset difference (GHO) was completed for consecutive patients from 6 week post-THA weight-bearing radiographs. The predefined target LLD and GHO was <10 mm and ABD target was 45° ± 10°. Differences between MGS and DGS were determined by independent t-tests.
Results: The MGS (250 patients, 315 hips) and DGS (183 patients, 218 hips) achieved targeted ABD in 98.7% and 96.8% of cases, respectively, and ABD was significantly lower in the MGS group (45.14 ± 4.03° and 47.01 ± 4.39°, respectively) (P < .001). Compared to MGS, the DGS group averaged significantly higher GHO (3.64 ± 2.44 and 4.45 ± 2.73 mm, respectively, P = .002) but was not significantly different regarding LLD (2.92 ± 2.55 and 3.19 ± 2.46 mm, respectively, P = .275). No significant group difference was noted for percentage within the targeted LLD and GHO; however, 93.5% of DGS and 97.6% of MGS achieved all three (P = .031).
Conclusion: The use of both the MGS and DGS resulted in consistent component placement within the predefined target zone. Although the MGS appeared to be slightly more consistent, these differences are unlikely to be clinically significant.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: global hip offset; grid; intraoperative fluoroscopy; leg length discrepancy; total hip arthroplasty
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20200719 Date Completed: 20210409 Latest Revision: 20210409
رمز التحديث: 20221213
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.053
PMID: 32680756
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.053