دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Audiological Performance in Children with Inner Ear Malformations Before and After Cochlear Implantation: A Cohort Study of 274 Patients.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Audiological Performance in Children with Inner Ear Malformations Before and After Cochlear Implantation: A Cohort Study of 274 Patients.
المؤلفون: Ozkan HB; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey., Cicek Cinar B; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey., Yucel E; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey., Sennaroglu G; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey., Sennaroglu L; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
المصدر: Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery [Clin Otolaryngol] 2021 Jan; Vol. 46 (1), pp. 154-160. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 22.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Blackwell Scientific Publications Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101247023 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1749-4486 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17494478 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Otolaryngol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Oxford : Blackwell Scientific Publications, c2005-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Cochlear Implantation* , Cochlear Implants* , Language Development*, Auditory Perception/*physiology , Ear, Inner/*abnormalities , Hearing Disorders/*therapy, Adolescent ; Case-Control Studies ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Hearing Disorders/diagnosis ; Hearing Disorders/etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Treatment Outcome
مستخلص: Background and Objective: Inner ear malformations (IEMs) are common in children with hearing loss. The different types of IEMs form a unique subgroup of cochlear implant (CI) candidates. We aimed to evaluate the auditory perception outcomes of CI in children with different types of IEMs and compare them with CI users without IEMs.
Methods: The study included 274 CI users with and without IEMs as two groups (n = 137, each). Both groups' chronological age at implantation and duration of CI usage was matched (± 8 months). All subjects were evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively by the Ling's sound test and the auditory perception test battery, which includes the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), closed-set Pattern Perception Test (PPT) and open-set Sentence Recognition Test (SRT). Besides, children with IEMs were assessed for language development.
Results: Progress in the IEMs' group differed according to the type of ear anomaly. CI users with enlarged vestibular aqueduct had the highest scores, while users with common cavity had the lowest. Children with IEMs performed well on the closed-set test while having difficulty with the open-set test.
Conclusion: Cochlear implantation outcomes are favourable in IEMs' patients with a cochlear nerve visible on magnetic resonance imaging. Our results indicate that it is critical to take the anatomical differences into account during follow-up and rehabilitation programmes. Each CI user should be evaluated according to his or her individual needs.
(© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
References: Chadha NK, James AL, Gordon KA, Blaser S, Papsin BC. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(9):903-909.
Sennaroglu L. Cochlear implantation in inner ear malformations-a review article. Cochlear Implants Int. 2010;11(1):4-41.
Ha JF, Wood B, Krishnaswamy J, Rajan GP. Incomplete cochlear partition type II variants as an indicator of congenital partial deafness: a first report. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(6):957-962.
Sennaroglu L, Bajin MD. Classification and current management of inner ear malformations. Balkan Med J. 2017;34(5):397-411.
Isaiah A, Lee D, Lenes-Voit F, et al. Clinical outcomes following cochlear implantation in children with inner ear anomalies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;93:1-6.
Tay SY, Anicete R, Tan KKH. A ten-year review of audiological performance in children with inner ear abnormalities after cochlear implantation in Singapore. Int J Otolaryngol. 2019;2019:6483714.
Shi Y, Li Y, Gong Y, Chen B, Chen J. Cochlear implants for patients with inner ear malformation: experience in a cohort of 877 surgeries. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019;44(4):702-706.
Eisenman DJ, Ashbaugh C, Zwolan TA, Arts HA, Telian SA. Implantation of the malformed cochlea. Otol Neurotol. 2001;22(6):834-841.
Yücel E, Sennaroğlu G. Çocuklar için işitsel algı testi (Children's Auditory Perception Skills Test (CIAT)). Adv Bionics. 2011.
Guven S, Topbas S. Adaptation of the test of early language development-(TELD-3) into Turkish: Reliability and validity study. Int J Early Child Spec Edu. 2014;6(2):151-176.
Yucel E, Aslan F, Ozkan HB, Sennaroglu L. Recent rehabilitation experience with pediatric ABI users. J Int Adv Otol. 2015;11(2):110-113.
Luntz M, Balkany T, Hodges AV, Telischi FF. Cochlear implants in children with congenital inner ear malformation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(9):974-977.
Dowell RC, Dettman SJ, Blamey PJ, Barker EJ, Clark GM. Speech perception in children using cochlear implants: prediction of long-term outcomes. Cochlear Implants Int. 2002;3(1):1-18.
Daneshi A, Hassanzadeh S, Abasalipour P, Emamdjomeh H, Farhadi M. Cochlear implantation in Mondini dysplasia. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2003;65(1):39-44.
Pritchett C, Zwolan T, Huq F, et al. Variations in the cochlear implant experience in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(9):2169-2174.
Patel ND, Ascha MS, Manzoor NF, et al. Morphology and cochlear implantation in enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018;39(6):657-663.
Coudert A, Vigier S, Scalabre A, Hermann R, Ayari-Khalfallah S, Truy E. Analysis of inner ear malformations associated with a facial nerve anomaly in 653 children fitted with a cochlear implant. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019;44(1):96-101.
Papsin BC. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26.
Batuk MO, Cinar BC, Yarali M, et al. Bimodal stimulation in children with inner ear malformation: One side cochlear implant and contralateral auditory brainstem implant. Clin Otolaryngol. 2020;45(2):231-238.
Merkus P, Di Lella F, Di Trapani G, et al. Indications and contraindications of auditory brainstem implants: systematic review and illustrative cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(1):3-13.
Tucci DT, Telian SA, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Zwolan TA, Kileny PR. Cochlear implantation in patients with cochlear malformations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(8):833-838.
Xia J, Wang W, Zhang D. Cochlear implantation in 21 patients with common cavity malformation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015;135(5):459-465.
Fang HY, Ko HC, Wang NM, et al. Auditory performance and speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking children implanted before age 5. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(5):799-803.
Gordon KA, Wong DD, Papsin BC. Bilateral input protects the cortex from unilaterally-driven reorganization in children who are deaf. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 5):1609-1625.
Gordon KA, Wong DDE, Valero J, Jewell SF, Yoo P, Papsin BC. Use it or lose it? Lessons learned from the developing brains of children who are deaf and use cochlear implants to hear. Brain Topogr. 2011;24(3-4):204-219.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: cochlear implantation < Middle ear surgery; hearing loss < Paediatric ORL; inner ear < Otology; speech and language/communication disorders < Paediatric ORL
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20200805 Date Completed: 20211227 Latest Revision: 20211227
رمز التحديث: 20231215
DOI: 10.1111/coa.13625
PMID: 32749771
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1749-4486
DOI:10.1111/coa.13625