دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Characterizing the nectar microbiome of the non-native tropical milkweed, Asclepias curassavica, in an urban environment.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Characterizing the nectar microbiome of the non-native tropical milkweed, Asclepias curassavica, in an urban environment.
المؤلفون: Warren ML; Department of Biology, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, California, United States of America.; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America., Kram KE; Department of Biology, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, California, United States of America., Theiss KE; Department of Biology, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, California, United States of America.
المصدر: PloS one [PLoS One] 2020 Sep 02; Vol. 15 (9), pp. e0237561. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 02 (Print Publication: 2020).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Microbiota* , Plant Nectar* , Tropical Climate* , Urbanization*, Asclepias/*microbiology, Bacteria/growth & development ; Biodiversity ; Flowers/microbiology ; Fungi/growth & development
مستخلص: In increasingly urban landscapes, the loss of native pollen and nectar floral resources is impacting ecologically important pollinators. Increased urbanization has also brought about the rise of urban gardens which introduce new floral resources that may help replace those the pollinators have lost. Recently, studies have shown that the microbial communities of nectar may play an important role in plant-pollinator interactions, but these microbial communities and the floral visitors in urban environments are poorly studied. In this study we characterized the floral visitors and nectar microbial communities of Ascelpias curassavica, a non-native tropical milkweed commonly, in an urban environment. We found that the majority of the floral visitors to A. curassavica were honey bees followed closely by monarch butterflies. We also found that there were several unique visitors to each site, such as ants, wasps, solitary bees, several species of butterflies and moths, Anna's hummingbird, and the tarantula hawk wasp. Significant differences in the nectar bacterial alpha and beta diversity were found across the urban sites, although we found no significant differences among the fungal communities. We found that the differences in the bacterial communities were more likely due to the environment and floral visitors rather than physiological differences in the plants growing at the gardens. Greater understanding of the impact of urbanization on the nectar microbiome of urban floral resources and consequently their effect on plant-pollinator relationships will help to predict how these relationships will change with urbanization, and how negative impacts can be mitigated through better management of the floral composition in urban gardens.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References: BMC Ecol. 2016 Mar 30;16:18. (PMID: 27030361)
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 03;8(7):e67556. (PMID: 23844027)
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Mar 13;286(1898):20182295. (PMID: 30836877)
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217. (PMID: 23630581)
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Mar;22(3):1046-53. (PMID: 26663622)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7. (PMID: 17586664)
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013 Apr;63(Pt 4):1532-1539. (PMID: 22904213)
Microb Ecol. 2011 Jan;61(1):82-91. (PMID: 20449581)
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90234. (PMID: 24587293)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 24;103(4):956-61. (PMID: 16418284)
Conserv Biol. 2017 Feb;31(1):24-29. (PMID: 27624925)
Ann Bot. 2018 Jun 8;121(7):1343-1349. (PMID: 29562323)
C R Biol. 2008 Jun;331(6):452-65. (PMID: 18510998)
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 22;279(1729):749-58. (PMID: 21775330)
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 30;7:45315. (PMID: 28358006)
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jul;23(7):2818-2830. (PMID: 27988975)
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jan 15;281(1778):20132637. (PMID: 24430846)
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 May;80(2):281-93. (PMID: 22224447)
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Sep;28(9):524-30. (PMID: 23746938)
Mycologia. 2016 Jan-Feb;108(1):1-5. (PMID: 26553774)
Int J Biometeorol. 2000 Aug;44(2):60-6. (PMID: 10993559)
Ann Bot. 2009 Jun;103(9):1415-23. (PMID: 19208669)
Ann Bot. 2012 Nov;110(6):1173-83. (PMID: 22915578)
Int J Biometeorol. 2009 May;53(3):287-98. (PMID: 19219464)
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Feb;25(2):90-8. (PMID: 19758724)
Ecol Lett. 2011 Oct;14(10):1062-72. (PMID: 21806746)
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e86494. (PMID: 24466119)
PeerJ. 2015 Aug 04;3:e1141. (PMID: 26290795)
Ecology. 2014 Jul;95(7):1792-8. (PMID: 25163113)
FEMS Yeast Res. 2016 Feb;16(1):fov115. (PMID: 26703195)
Annu Rev Entomol. 1996;41:257-86. (PMID: 15012330)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22. (PMID: 20534432)
Ann Bot. 2019 Jan 23;123(2):311-325. (PMID: 30099492)
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2012 Feb;4(1):97-104. (PMID: 23757235)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7492-7. (PMID: 24799685)
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):345-53. (PMID: 20188434)
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 03;5:8695. (PMID: 25733079)
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 22;282(1801):20141734. (PMID: 25589600)
Bioinformatics. 2014 Mar 1;30(5):614-20. (PMID: 24142950)
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 May;24(5):393-401. (PMID: 30792076)
mBio. 2013 Feb 26;4(2):. (PMID: 23443006)
Ecology. 2013 Feb;94(2):273-9. (PMID: 23691645)
PeerJ. 2016 Oct 18;4:e2584. (PMID: 27781170)
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 22;277(1689):1827-34. (PMID: 20147331)
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 18;8(10):e76910. (PMID: 24204702)
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011 Nov;13(6):918-24. (PMID: 21972888)
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 05;280(1752):20122601. (PMID: 23222453)
Nature. 2016 Dec 8;540(7632):220-229. (PMID: 27894123)
New Phytol. 2018 Nov;220(3):750-759. (PMID: 28960308)
Ecology. 2016 Jun;97(6):1410-9. (PMID: 27459772)
Microb Ecol. 2012 May;63(4):711-8. (PMID: 22080257)
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Oct;23(19):19776-86. (PMID: 27411538)
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10. (PMID: 2231712)
Ecol Lett. 2017 Jul;20(7):901-910. (PMID: 28597955)
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200. (PMID: 21700674)
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Jun;80(3):591-602. (PMID: 22324904)
سلسلة جزيئية: Dryad 10.5061/dryad.s7h44j14w
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Plant Nectar)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20200903 Date Completed: 20201020 Latest Revision: 20201020
رمز التحديث: 20240628
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC7467256
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237561
PMID: 32877468
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0237561