Interpretative characteristics and case features associated with the performances of radiologists in reading mammograms: A study from a non-screening population in Asia.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان:	Interpretative characteristics and case features associated with the performances of radiologists in reading mammograms: A study from a non-screening population in Asia.
المؤلفون:	Trieu PDY; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, New South Wales, Australia., Puslednik L; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Colley B; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Brennan A; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Rodriguez VC; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Cook N; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Dean K; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Dryburgh S; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Lowe H; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Mahon C; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., McGowan S; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., O'Brien J; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Moog W; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Whale J; St Matthews Catholic School, New South Wales, Australia., Wong D; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, New South Wales, Australia., Li T; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, New South Wales, Australia., Brennan PC; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, New South Wales, Australia.
المصدر:	Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology [Asia Pac J Clin Oncol] 2021 Feb; Vol. 17 (1), pp. 139-148. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 07.
نوع المنشور:	Journal Article
اللغة:	English
بيانات الدورية:	Publisher: Blackwell Pub. Asia Country of Publication: Australia NLM ID: 101241430 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1743-7563 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17437555 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة:	Original Publication: Carlton South, Vic. : Blackwell Pub. Asia, c2005-
مواضيع طبية MeSH:	Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging, Adult ; Asia ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology ; Clinical Competence ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Mammography ; Odds Ratio ; Radiologists
مستخلص:	Aims: To explore radiologist characteristics and case features associated with diagnostic performances in cancer detection on mammograms in a South East Asian population. Methods: Fifty-three radiologists reported 60 mammographic examinations which consisted of 40 normal and 20 cancer-containing cases at the BREAST workshops. Radiologists were asked to examine each mammogram using the BIRADS on diagnostic monitors. Differences in reader characteristics and case features between correct and incorrect decisions were assessed separately for cancer and normal cases. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were applied to generate odds ratios (OR) for significant factors related to correct decisions. Results: Radiologists who spent ≥10 hours/week reporting mammograms had a higher possibility of detecting cancer lesions (OR = 1.6; P = 0.01). A higher rate of accuracy in reporting negative cases was associated with female radiologists (OR = 1.4; P = 0.002), radiologists who read ≤20 mammograms per week (OR = 1.5; P < 0.0001), had completed training course (OR = 1.7; P < 0.0001) or wore eyeglasses (OR = 1.4; P = 0.01). Cancer cases with breast density >50% (OR = 2.1; P < 0.0001), having abnormal lesions ≥9 mm (OR = 1.8; P < 0.0001), or displaying calcifications, a discrete mass or nonspecific density (OR = 1.6; P < 0.0001) were recorded with a higher detection rate by radiologists than other cases. Lesions located on the right breasts (OR = 1.8; P < 0.0001) or found in the lower inner, upper outer or mixed locations (OR = 2.7; P < 0.0001) were also recorded with a better diagnostic possibility compared with other lesions. Conclusion: This work identified key features related to diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer on mammograms in a nonscreening population, which is helpful for developing appropriate strategies to improve breast cancer detectability of radiologists. (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)
References:	Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Aources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359-E386. Porter P. “Westernizing” women's risks? Breast cancer in lower-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(3):213-216. Trieu PD, Mello-Thoms C, Brennan PC. Female breast cancer in Vietnam: A comparison across Asian specific regions. Cancer Biol Med. 2015;12(3):238-245. Lan NH, Laohasiriwong W, Stewart JF. Survival probability and prognostic factors for breast cancer patients in Vietnam. Global Health Action. 2013;6:1-9. Di Maggio C. State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(Suppl 1):S56-69. Kavanagh AM, Giles GG, Mitchell H, Cawson JN. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of screening mammography and symptomatic status. J Med Screen. 2000;7(2):105-110. Wang AT, Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K. Breast density and breast cancer risk: A practical review. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(4):548-557. Al Mousa DS, Brennan PC, Ryan EA, Lee WB, Tan J, Mello-Thoms C. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns. Acad Radiol. 2014;21(11):1386-1393. Brennan PC, Trieu PD, Tapia K, Ryan J, Mello-Thoms C, Lee W, BREAST: A Novel Strategy to Improve the Detection of Breast Cancer. In: Hiroshi Fujita TH, Chisako Muramatsu, editor. Lecture Notes in Computer Science - 12th International Workshop, IWDM 2014, Gifu City, Japan, June 29-July 2, 2014, Proceedings. 8539: Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2014. p. 438-443. Jackson RL, Double CR, Munro HJ, et al. Breast cancer diagnostic efficacy in a developing South-East Asian Country. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(3):727-731. Soh BPL WB, Wong J, Sim L, Hillis SL, Tapia KA, Brennan PC, editor Varying performance in mammographic interpretation across two countries: Do results indicate reader or population variances? SPIE, Medical Imaging: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; 2016; USA. Demchig D, Mello-Thoms C, Lee WB, Khurelsukh K, Ramish A, Brennan PC. Mammographic detection of breast cancer in a non-screening country. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1091):20180071. Brennan PC, McEntee M, Evanoff M, Phillips P, O'Connor WT, Manning DJ. Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(2):W177-W180. Barton BP. Journal of Medical Statistics: A Guide to SPSS, Data Analysis and Critical Appraisal. 2nd ed. USA: Wiley BMJ Books; 2014. Rawashdeh MA, Lee WB, Bourne RM, et al. Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings. Radiology. 2013;269(1):61-67. Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(4):282-290. Suleiman WI, Lewis SJ, Georgian-Smith D, Evanoff MG, McEntee MF. Number of mammography cases read per year is a strong predictor of sensitivity. J Med Imaging. 2014;1(1):015503. Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, et al. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology. 2009;253(3):641-651. Miglioretti DL, Haneuse SJ, Anderson ML. Statistical approaches for modeling radiologists' interpretive performance. Acad Radiol. 2009;16(2):227-238. Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):206-213. Thomson WD. Eye problems and visual display terminals-the facts and the fallacies. Ophthalm Physiol Opt. 1998;18(2):111-119. Jackson AJ, Barnett ES, Stevens AB, McClure M, Patterson C, McReynolds MJ. Vision screening, eye examination and risk assessment of display screen users in a large regional teaching hospital. Ophthalm Physiol Opt. 1997;17(3):187-195. Goergen SK, Evans J, Cohen GP, MacMillan JH. Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology. 1997;204(1):131-135. Trieu PD, Mello-Thoms C, Peat JK, Do TD, Brennan PC. Characterization of breast density in Vietnamese women and its association with demographic, reproductive and lifestyle factors. Proc SPIE 10136, Medical Imaging 2017: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment. 2017;101361K. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):227-236. Rawashdeh MA, Bourne RM, Ryan EA, et al. Quantitative measures confirm the inverse relationship between lesion speculation and detection of breast masses. Acad Radiol. 2013;20(5):576-580. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology. 1992;184(3):613-617. Dorrius MD, Pijnappel RM, Sijens PE, van der Weide MC, Oudkerk M. The negative predictive value of breast magnetic resonance imaging in noncalcified BIRADS 3 lesions. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(2):209-213.
معلومات مُعتمدة:	2016-2018 Sydney Southeast Asia Center (SSEAC)
فهرسة مساهمة:	Keywords: breast cancer; cancer detection; mammograms; radiology
تواريخ الأحداث:	Date Created: 20200907 Date Completed: 20210203 Latest Revision: 20210203
رمز التحديث:	20231215
DOI:	10.1111/ajco.13429
PMID:	32894814
قاعدة البيانات:	MEDLINE

View record at Wiley

Full Text Finder

الوصف
تدمد:	1743-7563
DOI:	10.1111/ajco.13429