دورية أكاديمية
Influence of Different Pigment Incorporation Methods on the Sorption and Solubility of Medical Silicones.
| العنوان: | Influence of Different Pigment Incorporation Methods on the Sorption and Solubility of Medical Silicones. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Nobrega AS; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil., de Moraes Melo Neto CL; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil., de Magalhães Bertoz AP; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil., de Melo Moreno AL; Department of Pediatric and Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil., Goiato MC; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil. |
| المصدر: | European journal of dentistry [Eur J Dent] 2022 Jul; Vol. 16 (3), pp. 521-527. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 01. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Thieme Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 101303672 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1305-7456 (Print) NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eur J Dent Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: [2019]- : [Stuttgart] : Thieme Original Publication: Ankara : Dental Investigations Society |
| مستخلص: | Objective: The aim of this study is to verify the influence of three pigment incorporation methods (conventional, mechanical, and industrial) on the sorption and solubility of the MDX4-4210 and A-2186 silicones. Materials and Methods: The groups formed were based on the silicones used (A-2186 and MDX4-4210), intrinsic pigments (pink, bronze, and black), and pigment incorporation methods (conventional, mechanical, and industrial). The dimensions of all samples were 45-mm diameter (ø) × 1-mm thickness. Readings were taken initially and after 1,008 hours of aging. Statistical Analysis: Three-way analysis of variance and the Tukey's test were performed (α = 0.05). Results: For sorption and solubility, there was no difference between the incorporation methods for the A-2186 silicone, regardless of the pigment used ( p > 0.05). For pink MDX4-4210, the industrial and mechanical methods showed higher values of sorption compared with the conventional method ( p < 0.05). For bronze MDX4-4210, the industrial method showed a higher sorption value compared with the conventional and mechanical methods ( p < 0.05). For black MDX4-4210, there was no difference between incorporation methods based on sorption ( p > 0.05). For pink MDX4-4210, the mechanical method showed a higher solubility value compared with the industrial and conventional methods ( p < 0.05). For black MDX4-4210 and bronze MDX4-4210, there was no statistically significant difference between incorporation methods based on solubility (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Based on sorption and solubility, for the A-2186 silicone, the conventional, mechanical, and industrial methods of pigment incorporation were equivalent. For the MDX4-4210 silicone, its results of sorption and solubility were varied, and further studies are recommended. Competing Interests: None declared. (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).) |
| References: | J Prosthodont. 2011 Jan;20(1):60-6. (PMID: 21054642) J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Dec;8(12):ZE08-13. (PMID: 25654054) Dent Mater. 2002 May;18(3):281-6. (PMID: 11823022) Front Chem. 2014 May 14;2:25. (PMID: 24860802) J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):397-403. (PMID: 28689901) J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):53-62. (PMID: 27134429) Int J Dent. 2020 Aug 20;2020:8492091. (PMID: 32884572) J Oral Rehabil. 1996 Jul;23(7):476-80. (PMID: 8814563) Indian J Dent Res. 2016 May-Jun;27(3):288-94. (PMID: 27411658) Int J Artif Organs. 2017 Nov 9;:0. (PMID: 29148020) J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Oct;116(4):623-629.e1. (PMID: 27157603) Eur J Dent. 2019 Jul;13(3):399-404. (PMID: 31795004) J Dent Res. 1983 Jun;62(6):764-8. (PMID: 6574160) Materials (Basel). 2018 May 30;11(6):. (PMID: 29848959) J Am Dent Assoc. 1975 Feb;90(2):451-8. (PMID: 1089122) Dent Mater. 1999 Nov;15(6):450-5. (PMID: 10863448) J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Jan;19(1):225-31. (PMID: 17597370) J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Mar;13(1):30-5. (PMID: 24431704) Int J Dent. 2019 Dec 21;2019:2573095. (PMID: 31933644) J Biomater Appl. 2003 Apr;17(4):321-35. (PMID: 12797423) |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20201001 Latest Revision: 20220928 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240628 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC9507615 |
| DOI: | 10.1055/s-0040-1716598 |
| PMID: | 33003238 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
| تدمد: | 1305-7456 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1055/s-0040-1716598 |