دورية أكاديمية
National guidelines on nutrient reference values for the healthy adult population and for pregnant or lactating women are based on heterogeneous sources of evidence: review of guidelines.
| العنوان: | National guidelines on nutrient reference values for the healthy adult population and for pregnant or lactating women are based on heterogeneous sources of evidence: review of guidelines. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Willi S; Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland., Stamm L; Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland., Aldakak L; Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland., Staub K; Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland., Rühli F; Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland., Bender N; Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland. |
| المصدر: | Nutrition reviews [Nutr Rev] 2021 Mar 09; Vol. 79 (4), pp. 462-478. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Systematic Review |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Oxford University Press Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0376405 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1753-4887 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00296643 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Nutr Rev Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: 2015- : Oxford Oxford University Press Original Publication: [Washington, D.C.] : International Life Sciences Institute |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Nutrition Policy*, Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Lactation ; Nutrients ; Pregnancy ; Reference Values |
| مستخلص: | Many countries provide dietary guidelines for health practitioners and/or the general population. However, there is no general, international guideline serving as a template for national dietary guidelines, and there is little to no consensus regarding reference values for different nutrients. The present review compared 27 national dietary guidelines for healthy adults as well as for pregnant and/or breastfeeding women, and analysed their quality and the evidence behind their recommendations. The guidelines were evaluated for their quality using the instrument Agree II, and found to be heterogeneous (overall quality score 14%-100%) and often insufficient (quality score < 50%) due to missing information about their methodology and sources of evidence. We analysed the evidence (number of studies, study types and publication years) of reference values of a number of nutrients using the five guidelines that provided the highest scores in the Agree II assessment. The reference values varied among guidelines, were rarely based on up-to-date meta-analyses, and were often based on insufficiently reported evidence (22/27 guidelines with quality score < 50%). We recommend systematic reviews of high quality studies to formulate future guidelines, and to use guidelines on how to write guidelines. (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.) |
| التعليقات: | Erratum in: Nutr Rev. 2021 Mar 9;79(4):494. (PMID: 33448290) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Agree II; nutritional guidelines; review of guidelines |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20201005 Date Completed: 20210517 Latest Revision: 20210517 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa062 |
| PMID: | 33015718 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
| تدمد: | 1753-4887 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa062 |