دورية أكاديمية
[Scoping review of the effectiveness of screen-to-screen-therapy compared to face-to-face-therapy on naming performance for patients with aphasia].
| العنوان: | [Scoping review of the effectiveness of screen-to-screen-therapy compared to face-to-face-therapy on naming performance for patients with aphasia]. |
|---|---|
| عنوان ترانسليتريتد: | Scoping Review über die Wirksamkeit einer Screen-to-Screen-Therapie im Vergleich zu einer Face-to-Face-Therapie bei Patient*innen mit Aphasie auf die Benennleistungen. |
| المؤلفون: | Cordes L; Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland., Loukanova S; Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland., Forstner J; Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Electronic address: johanna.forstner@med.uni-heidelberg.de. |
| المصدر: | Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen [Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes] 2020 Nov; Vol. 156-157, pp. 1-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 05. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Review |
| اللغة: | German |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Elsevier Urban & Fischer Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 101477604 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2212-0289 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 18659217 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Amsterdam ; New York : Elsevier Urban & Fischer |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Aphasia*/therapy , Coronavirus Infections* , Pandemics* , Pneumonia, Viral* , Stroke*/complications , Stroke*/therapy , Telemedicine* , Videoconferencing*, Adult ; Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Canada ; Cross-Over Studies ; Germany ; Humans ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; SARS-CoV-2 ; User-Computer Interface |
| مستخلص: | Introduction: About 35,000 people in Germany suffered from stroke-related aphasia in 2019. One of the most frequent manifestations of aphasia are word finding disorders. In times of the COVID-19 pandemic, the temporary approval of video therapy enables the maintenance of speech therapy treatment. This leads to the necessity to investigate the effectiveness of screen-to-screen therapy via a video conferencing system compared to conventional face-to-face therapy of adult aphasia patients. Methods: For this scoping review, a literature search in the databases Cochrane, Pubmed and Web of Science was conducted for the period February 2010 to 2020. We included German- and English-language studies comparing the effectiveness of a classic face-to-face therapy with a screen-to-screen therapy of adults with aphasia. The studies were selected using the PRISMA flowchart. Results: A total of five studies were identified. Both face-to-face therapy and screen-to-screen therapy showed significant improvements in naming performance in an Italian crossover study, a Canadian randomized study and a quasi-randomized study conducted in the UK. No improvements were found for both forms of intervention in an Israeli crossover study. In a German comparative study, significant improvements in naming performance were found for face-to-face therapy, but the results did not differ significantly from the screen-to-screen therapy intervention group. Discussion: In all included studies, screen-to-screen therapy and face-to-face therapy had a comparable effectiveness on naming performance. The results demonstrate the feasibility of a screen-to-screen therapy under everyday conditions. However, it is possible that this form of therapy cannot always be implemented. Barriers to screen-to-screen therapy can be the use of technologies and restrictions in the visual field due to a neglect. One limitation of the scoping review was that only the naming performance was considered as an outcome, another was the small number of studies included. Conclusion: For many patients screen-to-screen therapy is currently the only possibility to receive speech therapy treatment. Therefore it is a positive aspect that screen-to-screen therapy is as effective as face-to-face therapy. Screen-to-screen therapy can provide expanded access to health care and professional expertise in health services. In this way, speech therapy care during the COVID-19 pandemic can be largely maintained. Further research is needed on evidence-based treatment methods and user-oriented apps for video therapy. (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier GmbH.) |
| References: | J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Sep;27(9):2306-2318. (PMID: 29880211) Nervenarzt. 2017 Aug;88(8):866-873. (PMID: 28597028) Aphasiology. 2011 Nov 18;25(11):1327-1346. (PMID: 22582002) PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. (PMID: 19621070) BMJ. 2020 Mar 26;368:m1198. (PMID: 32217618) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 01;(6):CD000425. (PMID: 27245310) BMC Med. 2015 Apr 23;13:91. (PMID: 25902803) Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Nov 1;25(4):642-653. (PMID: 27784033) Stroke. 2006 Jun;37(6):1379-84. (PMID: 16690899) Lancet. 2017 Apr 15;389(10078):1528-1538. (PMID: 28256356) J Commun Disord. 2017 Jan - Feb;65:43-53. (PMID: 28171741) Clin Rehabil. 2016 Apr;30(4):359-73. (PMID: 25911523) Ann Neurol. 1995 Oct;38(4):659-66. (PMID: 7574464) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 31;1:CD010255. (PMID: 32002991) Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Jun;143:1-7. (PMID: 31296451) Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:706909. (PMID: 24829914) J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 21;17(5):e121. (PMID: 25998006) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Aphasia; Aphasie; Efficacy; Review; Speech therapy; Sprachtherapie; Telemedicine; Telemedizin; Video consultation; Videotherapie; Wirksamkeit |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20201009 Date Completed: 20201117 Latest Revision: 20220531 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240513 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC7535801 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.08.002 |
| PMID: | 33032962 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 2212-0289 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.08.002 |