دورية أكاديمية

Upper eyelid blepharoplasty using plasma exeresis: Evaluation of outcomes, satisfaction, and symptoms after procedure.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Upper eyelid blepharoplasty using plasma exeresis: Evaluation of outcomes, satisfaction, and symptoms after procedure.
المؤلفون: Ferreira FC; Oculoplastic Surgery Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Sathler CSCO; Oculoplastic Surgery Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Hida IY; Oculoplastic Surgery Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Leite SC; Oculoplastic Surgery Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Kusabara AA; Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., de Castro ACV; Oculoplastic Surgery Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Ribeiro MZML; Oculoplastic Surgery Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Nahas TR; Oculoplastic Surgery Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
المصدر: Journal of cosmetic dermatology [J Cosmet Dermatol] 2021 Sep; Vol. 20 (9), pp. 2758-2764. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 19.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Observational Study
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Blackwell Science Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101130964 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1473-2165 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14732130 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Cosmet Dermatol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Science, c2002-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Blepharoplasty*/adverse effects , Blepharoptosis*/surgery, Eyelids/surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Personal Satisfaction ; Quality of Life
مستخلص: Background: Facial care treatments have grown a remarkable demand for effective and minimally invasive techniques with fast recovery time. Plasma technology is a nonsurgical alternative technique for skin rejuvenation.
Aims: We assessed patient satisfaction and symptoms after upper eyelid blepharoplasty with plasma technology.
Patients/methods: Observational study including 16 patients submitted to upper eyelid blepharoplasty using plasma technology to treat dermatochalasis. Patient satisfaction, symptoms, and quality of life were assessed using 2 questionnaires at follow-up days 7 and 30. Also, the answers were correlated with age, Fitzpatrick skin type, and quantity of eyelid skin treated with plasma.
Results: All 16 patients were treated and completed the survey. Fourteen (87.5%) were female, and the mean age was 50.5 years. Physical appearance was the most relevant factor impacting on quality of life at first week postoperative. Regarding satisfaction with results, most patients stated higher level of satisfaction at day 7 follow-up analysis (P = .038). Less impact on quality of life and higher satisfaction was associated with eyelid-treated area (P = .044 and P = .036) and Fitzpatrick skin type (P = .043) at 7 and 30 days after procedure, respectively. Eyelid edema and itching were the symptoms most reported at 7 and 30 days, respectively.
Conclusions: Upper blepharoplasty with plasma is a minimally invasive treatment with low impact on quality of life. However, overall patient satisfaction is questionable when considering less willing of undergoing procedure again and decreased expectation with results over postoperative period. Symptoms are reported mainly at the first week after procedure.
(© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
References: Hollander MHJ, Contini M, Pott JW, Vissink A, Schepers RH, Jansma J. Functional outcomes of upper eyelid blepharoplasty: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(2):294-309.
Bhattacharjee K, Misra DK, Deori N. Updates on upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65(7):551-558.
Giroux PA, Hersant B, SidAhmed-Mezi M, Pizza C, La Padula S, Meningaud JP. The outcomes assessment of the plasma blade technology in upper blepharoplasties: a prospective study on a series of 25 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(4):948-955.
Morax S. Complications des blépharoplasties. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2004;27(6):658-674.
Artioli SS, Valezi VG, Passos W. Complicações da blefaroplastia superior. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2012;71(4):253-255.
Scarano A, Lorusso F, Brucoli M, Lucchina AG, Carinci F, Mortellaro C. Upper eyelid blepharoplasty with voltaic arc dermabrasion. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(8):2263-2266.
Cantisani C, Amori P, Vitiello G, et al. Nonsurgical blepharoplasty. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(6):e13119.
Rossi E, Farnetani F, Trakatelli M, Ciardo S, Pellacani G. Clinical and confocal microscopy study of plasma exeresis for nonsurgical blepharoplasty of the upper eyelid: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(2):283-290.
Paixão MP, Miot HA, Machado Filho CD. Assessing the impact of upper blepharoplasty on quality of life with a standardized questionnaire (QBleflaro): a pilot study. An Bras Dermatol. 2008;83(1):32-37.
Damasceno RW, Cariello AJ, Cardoso EB, Viana GA, Osaki MH. Upper blepharoplasty with or without resection of the orbicularis oculi muscle: a randomized double-blind left-right study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27(3):195-197.
Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(6):869-871.
Bogle MA, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Evaluation of plasma skin regeneration technology in low-energy full-facial rejuvenation. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(2):168-174.
Sotiris T, Irini G, Ioannis N. Noninvasive upper blepharoplasty in relation to surgical blepharoplasty. Pinnacle Med Med Sci. 2014;1(5):436-440.
Scarano A, Bertuzzi G, Brandimarte B, Carinci F, Lucchese A. Treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum with voltaic arc dermoabrasion. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2012;1(3):17-22.
Baroni A. Long-wave plasma radiofrequency ablation for treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(1):121-123.
Scarano A, Mortellaro C, Mavriqi L, Di Cerbo A. Evaluation effectiveness of the voltaic arc dermabrasion in perioral rhytides eradication. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(5):1205-1208.
Potter MJ, Harrison R, Ramsden A, Bryan B, Andrews P, Gault D. Facial acne and fine lines: transforming patient outcomes with plasma skin regeneration. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58(6):608-613.
Kilmer S, Semchyshyn N, Shah G, Fitzpatrick R. A pilot study on the use of a plasma skin regeneration device (Portrait PSR3) in full facial rejuvenation procedures. Lasers Med Sci. 2007;22(2):101-109.
Holcomb JD, Kent KJ, Rousso DE. Nitrogen plasma skin regeneration and aesthetic facial surgery: multicenter evaluation of concurrent treatment. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(3):184-193.
Finlay AY, Coles EC. The effect of severe psoriasis on the quality of life of 369 patients. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132(2):236-244.
Martins GA, Arruda L, Mugnaini ASB. Validation of life quality questionnaires for psoriasis patients. An Bras Dermatol. 2004;79(5):521-535.
Holm EA, Wulf HC, Stegmann H, Jemec GB. Life quality assessment among patients with atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154(4):719-725.
Alsarraf R. Outcomes instruments in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg. 2002;18(2):77-86.
Baroni A. Non-surgical blepharoplasty with the novel plasma radiofrequency ablation technology. Skin Res Technol. 2020;26(1):121-124.
Simone DA, Alreja M, Lamotte RH. Psychophysical studies of the itch sensation and itchy skin (“alloknesis”) produced by intracutaneous injection of histamine. Somatosens Mot Res. 1991;8(3):271-279.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: dermatochalasis; plasma technology; upper eyelid; upper eyelid blepharoplasty
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20201130 Date Completed: 20210819 Latest Revision: 20210819
رمز التحديث: 20221213
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13868
PMID: 33252188
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1473-2165
DOI:10.1111/jocd.13868