دورية أكاديمية

It is all relative: Contextual influences on boredom and neural correlates of regulatory processes.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: It is all relative: Contextual influences on boredom and neural correlates of regulatory processes.
المؤلفون: Perone S; Department of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA., Anderson AJ; Department of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA., Weybright EH; Department of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
المصدر: Psychophysiology [Psychophysiology] 2021 Mar; Vol. 58 (3), pp. e13746. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 14.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Blackwell Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0142657 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1540-5958 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00485772 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Psychophysiology Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Malden, MA : Blackwell
Original Publication: Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Boredom* , Self-Control*, Attention/*physiology , Brain Waves/*physiology , Executive Function/*physiology , Psychomotor Performance/*physiology, Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Self Report ; Young Adult
مستخلص: Interest in the influences on and strategies to mitigate boredom has grown immensely. Boredom emerges in contexts in which people have difficulty paying attention, such as underchallenging relative to optimally challenging conditions. The current study probed contextual influences on peoples' experience of boredom by manipulating the order with which people performed easy and optimally challenging conditions of a task (N = 113). We measured frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) and theta/beta as neural correlates of self-regulatory and attentional control processes, respectively. Results showed self-reported boredom was higher in the easy condition when the optimal condition was completed before it. Similarly, participant's FAA shifted rightward from the first to the second task when the optimal condition was completed prior to the easy condition, indicating that self-regulatory processes were strongly engaged under these context-specific conditions. Theta/beta was lower during the easy relative to the optimal condition, regardless of the task order, indicating that maintaining attention in the easy condition was more difficult. No relations between perceptions of the task and neural correlates were observed. Exploratory analyses revealed higher levels of variability in FAA and theta/beta were associated with less enjoyment and more boredom, respectively. We speculate these observations reflect the less consistent engagement of self-regulatory and attentional control and, in turn, might play a role in peoples' subjective experience. We discuss the implications of our findings for our understanding of influences on and strategies to mitigate boredom, as well as how attentional and self-regulatory processes operate under conditions boredom typically emerges.
(© 2020 Society for Psychophysiological Research.)
References: Allen, J. J. B., Keune, P. M., Schönenberg, M., & Nusslock, R. (2018). Frontal EEG alpha asymmetry and emotion: From neural underpinnings and methodological considerations to psychopathology and social cognition. Psychophysiology, 55(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13028.
Anderson, A. J., & Perone, S. (2018). Developmental change in the resting state electroencephalogram: Insights into cognition and the brain. Brain and Cognition, 126, 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2018.08.001.
Angelidis, A., Hagenaars, M., van Son, D., van der Does, W., & Putman, P. (2018). Do not look away! Spontaneous frontal EEG theta/beta ratio as a marker for cognitive control over attention to mild and high threat. Biological Psychology, 135, 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.03.002.
Angelidis, A., van der Does, W., Schakel, L., & Putman, P. (2016). Frontal EEG theta/beta ratio as an electrophysiological marker for attentional control and its test-retest reliability. Biological Psychology, 121, 49-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.09.008.
Arns, M., Drinkenburg, W. H., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Kenemans, J. L. (2012). Neurophysiological predictors of non-response to rTMS in depression. Brain Stimulation, 5(4), 569-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.003.
Barmack, J. E. (1939). Studies on the psychophysiology of boredom: Part I. The effect of 15 mgs. of benzedrine sulfate and 60 mgs. of ephedrine hydrochloride on blood pressure, report of boredom and other factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25(5), 494-505. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054402.
Bassi, M., & Delle Fave, A. (2012). Optimal experience and self-determination at school: Joining perspectives. Motivation and Emotion, 36(4), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9268-z.
Buss, A. T., & Spencer, J. P. (2014). The emergent executive: A dynamic field theory of the development of executive function. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/mono.12096.
Chin, A., Markey, A., Bhargava, S., Kassam, K., & Loewenstein, G. (2017). Bored in the USA: Experience sampling and boredom in everyday life. Emotion, 17(2), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000232.
Coan, J. A., & Allen, J. J. B. (2004). Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion. Biological Psychology, 67(1-2), 7-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.002.
Coan, J. A., Allen, J. J. B., & McKnight, P. E. (2006). A capability model of individual differences in frontal EEG asymmetry. Biological Psychology, 72(2), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.10.003.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815-822. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.56.5.815.
Davidson, R. J. (2000). Cognitive neuroscience needs affective neuroscience (and vice versa). Brain and Cognition, 42(1), 89-92. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1999.1170.
Davidson, R. J. (2002). Anxiety and affective style: Role of prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Biological Psychiatry, 51(1), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01328-2.
Davidson, R. J. (2004). What does the prefrontal cortex “do” in affect: Perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research. Biological Psychology, 67(1-2), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.008.
Davidson, R. J., & Irwin, W. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3077.003.0035.
Davidson, R. J., Schwartz, G. E., Saron, C., Bennett, J., & Goleman, D. J. (1979). Frontal versus parietal EEG asymmetry during positive and negative affect. Psychophysiology, 16, 202-203.
Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 482-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612456044.
Elpidorou, A. (2018). The bored mind is a guiding mind: Toward a regulatory theory of boredom. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17, 455-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9515-1.
Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced complience. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 58, 203-2010.
Fisher, C. D. (1987). Boredom: Construct, causes, and consequences. Technical Report. Texas A & M University, Department of Management.
Fisher, C. D. (1993). Boredom at work: A neglected concept. Human Relations, 46, 395-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600305.
Gable, P. A., Neal, L. B., & Threadgill, A. H. (2018). Regulatory behavior and frontal activity: Considering the role of revised-BIS in relative right frontal asymmetry. Psychophysiology, 55, e12910. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12910.
Geiwitz, J. (1966). Structure of boredom. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 3(5), 592-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023202.
Goldberg, Y. K., Eastwood, J. D., Laguardia, J., & Danckert, J. (2011). Boredom: An emotional experience distinct from apathy, anhedonia, or depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(6), 647-666. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.6.647.
Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(70)90069-0.
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, D. J., & O'Donnell, W. J. (1972). Infancy and the optimal level of stimulation. Child Development, 43(2), 639-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1972.tb01130.x.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Gable, P. A. (2018). On the role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in approach and withdrawal motivation: An updated review of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 55(1), e12879. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12879.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Sigelman, J. (2001). State anger and prefrontal brain activity: Evidence that insult-related relative left-prefrontal activation is associated with experienced anger and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 797-803. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.797.
Hunter, A., & Eastwood, J. D. (2018). Does state boredom cause failures of attention? Examining the relations between trait boredom, state boredom, and sustained attention. Experimental Brain Research, 236(9), 2483-2492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4749-7.
Kamarajan, C., Pandey, A. K., Chorlian, D. B., Manz, N., Stimus, A. T., Bauer, L. O., Hesselbrock, V. M., Schuckit, M. A., Kuperman, S., Kramer, J., & Porjesz, B. (2015). Reward processing deficits and impulsivity in high-risk offspring of alcoholics: A study of event-related potentials during a monetary gambling task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 98(2), 182-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.09.005.
Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2006). Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(2), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.033.
Kelley, N. J., Hortensius, R., Schutter, D. J. L. G., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2017). The relationship of approach/avoidance motivation and asymmetric frontal cortical activity: A review of studies manipulating frontal asymmetry. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 119, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.03.001.
Kılıç, A., van Tilburg, W. A. P., & Igou, E. R. (2019). Risk-taking increases under boredom. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(3), 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2160.
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013). An opportunity-cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 661-726. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003196.
Larson, R. W., & Richards, M. H. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students. American Journal of Education, 99(4), 418-443. https://doi.org/10.1086/443992.
Lenartowicz, A., & Loo, S. K. (2014). Use of EEG to diagnose ADHD. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-014-0498-0.
Lin, H., Saunders, B., Friese, M., Evans, N. J., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). Strong effort manipulations reduce response caution: A preregistered reinvention of the ego-deplection paradigm. Psychological Science, 31, 531-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904990.
Loo, S. K., Cho, A., Hale, T. S., McGough, J., McCracken, J., & Smalley, S. L. (2012). Characterization of the theta to beta ratio in ADHD: Identifying potential sources of heterogeneity. Journal of Attention Disorders, 17(5), 384-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712468050.
Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(April), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213.
Loukidou, L., Loan-Clarke, J., & Daniels, K. (2009). Boredom in the workplace: More than monotonous tasks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 381-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00267.x.
Lubar, J. F. (1991). Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 16(3), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000016.
Makeig, S., & Delorme, A. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009.
Markey, A., Chin, A., Vanepps, E. M., & Loewenstein, G. (2014). Identifying a reliable boredom induction. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 119(1), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.2466/27.PMS.119c18z6.
Mercer-Lynn, K. B., Bar, R. J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2014). Causes of boredom: The person, the situation, or both? Personality and Individual Differences, 56(1), 122-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.034.
Miao, P., Li, X., & Xie, X. (2020). Hard to bear: State boredom increases financial risk taking. Social Psychology, 51(3), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000408.
Milyavskaya, M., Inzlicht, M., Johnson, T., & Larson, M. J. (2019). Reward sensitivity following boredom and cognitive effort: A high-powered neurophysiological investigation. Neuropsychologia, 123, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.033.
Minnix, J. A., & Kline, J. P. (2004). Neuroticism predicts resting frontal EEG asymmetry variability. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(4), 823-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00155-7.
Monastra, V. J., Lubar, J. F., Linden, M., VanDeusen, P., Green, G., Wing, W., Phillips, A., & Fenger, T. N. (1999). Assessing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via quantitative electroencephalography: An initial validation study. Neuropsychology, 13(3), 424-433. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.13.3.424.
Moynihan, A. B., van Tilburg, W. A. P., Igou, E. R., Wisman, A., Donnelly, A. E., & Mulcaire, J. B. (2015). Eaten up by boredom: Consuming food to escape awareness of the bored self. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(April), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00369.
Nesselroade, J. R., & Ram, N. (2004). Studying intraindividual variability: What we have learned that will help us understand lives in context. Research in Human Development, 1, 9-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2004.9683328.
Ogrim, G., Kropotov, J., & Hestad, K. (2012). The quantitative EEG theta/beta ratio in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and normal controls: Sensitivity, specificity, and behavioral correlates. Psychiatry Research, 198(3), 482-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.041.
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/156869.
Perone, S., Almy, B., & Zelazo, P. D. (2018). Toward an understanding of the neural basis of executive function development. In R. L. Gibb & B. Kolb (Eds.), The neurobiology of brain and behavioral development (pp. 291-314). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804036-2.00011-X.
Perone, S., Molitor, S. J., Buss, A. T., Spencer, J. P., & Samuelson, L. K. (2015). Enhancing the executive functions of 3-year-olds in the dimensional change card sort task. Child Development, 86(3), 812-827. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12330.
Perone, S., Palanisamy, J., & Carlson, S. M. (2018). Age-related change in brain rhythms from early to middle childhood: Links to executive function. Developmental Science, 21(6), e12691. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12691.
Perone, S., Weybright, E. H., & Anderson, A. J. (2019). Over and over again: Changes in frontal EEG asymmetry across a boring task. Psychophysiology, 56(10), e13427. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13427.
Pickering, A., & Corr, P. (2008). J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality. In G. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), SAGE handbook of personality: Theory and assessment personality measurement and testing (Vol. 2, pp. 239-255). Sage.
Putman, P., Verkuil, B., Arias-Garcia, E., Pantazi, I., & van Schie, C. (2014). EEG theta/beta ratio as a potential biomarker for attentional control and resilience against deleterious effects of stress on attention. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 782-791. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0238-7.
Ram, N., Morelli, S., Lindberg, C., & Carstensen, L. L. (2008). From static to dynamic: The ongoing dialectic about human development. In K. Schaie, & R. Abeles (Eds.), Social structures and aging individuals: Continuing challenges (pp. 139-154). Springer.
Schutte, I., Kenemans, J. L., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2017). Resting-state theta/beta EEG ratio is associated with reward- and punishment-related reversal learning. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(4), 754-763. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-017-0510-3.
Schutter, D. J. L. G., & van Honk, J. (2005). Electrophysiological ratio markers for the balance between reward and punishment. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 685-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.002.
Struk, A. A., Scholer, A. A., Danckert, J., & Selie, P. (2020). Rich environments, dull experiences: How environment can exacerbate the effect of constraint on the experience of boredom. Cognition and Emotion, 34(7), 1517-1523. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1763919.
Troutwine, R., & O'Neal, E. C. (1981). Volition, performance of a boring task and time estimation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 865-866. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1981.52.3.865.
van Son, D., De Blasio, F. M., Fogarty, J. S., Angelidis, A., Barry, R. J., & Putman, P. (2019). Frontal EEG theta/beta ratio during mind wandering episodes. Biological Psychology, 140, 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.11.003.
van Tilburg, W. A. P., & Igou, E. R. (2011). On boredom and social identity: A pragmatic meaning-regulation approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1679-1691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211418530.
van Tilburg, W. A. P., & Igou, E. R. (2012). On boredom: Lack of challenge and meaning as distinct boredom experiences. Motivation and Emotion, 36(2), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9234-9.
van Tilburg, W. A. P., & Igou, E. R. (2017). Boredom begs to differ: Differentiation from other negative emotions. Emotion, 17(2), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000233.
Westgate, E. C. (2020). Why boredom is interesting. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419884309.
Westgate, E. C., & Wilson, T. D. (2018). Boring thoughts and bored minds: The MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement. Psychological Review, 125(5), 689-713. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000097.
Westgate, E. C., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2017). With a little help for our thoughts: Making it easier to think for pleasure. Emotion, 17(5), 828-839. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000278.
Weybright, E. H., Caldwell, L. L., Ram, N., Smith, E. A., & Wegner, L. (2015). Boredom prone or nothing to do? Distinguishing between state and trait leisure boredom and its association with substance use in South African adolescents. Leisure Sciences, 37(4), 311-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2015.1014530.
Wojtowicz, Z., Chater, N., & Lowenstein, G. (2020). Boredom and flow: An opportunity cost theory of attention-directing motivational states. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3339123.
Zhang, X., Bachmann, P., Schilling, T. M., Naumann, E., Schächinger, H., & Larra, M. F. (2018). Emotional stress regulation: The role of relative frontal alpha asymmetry in shaping the stress response. Biological Psychology, 138(August), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.08.007.
Zotev, V., Yuan, H., Misaki, M., Phillips, R., Young, K. D., Feldner, M. T., & Bodurka, J. (2016). Correlation between amygdala BOLD activity and frontal EEG asymmetry during real-time fMRI neurofeedback training in patients with depression. NeuroImage: Clinical, 11, 224-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.02.003.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: EEG; boredom; frontal alpha asymmetry; theta/beta ratio
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20201214 Date Completed: 20211130 Latest Revision: 20211130
رمز التحديث: 20240513
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13746
PMID: 33314169
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1540-5958
DOI:10.1111/psyp.13746