دورية أكاديمية
What Materials and Reproducible Techniques May Be Used in Recording Centric Relation? Best Evidence Consensus Statement.
| العنوان: | What Materials and Reproducible Techniques May Be Used in Recording Centric Relation? Best Evidence Consensus Statement. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Kattadiyil MT; Advanced Education Program in Prosthodontics, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA., Alzaid AA; Prosthetic Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.; Prosthodontics and Digital Technology, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA., Campbell SD; Restorative Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL. |
| المصدر: | Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists [J Prosthodont] 2021 Apr; Vol. 30 (S1), pp. 34-42. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Review |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9301275 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1532-849X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1059941X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Prosthodont |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: Hoboken, NJ : Wiley-Blackwell Original Publication: Philadelphia, PA : W.B. Saunders Co., c1992- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Centric Relation*, Chin ; Consensus ; Jaw Relation Record ; Reproducibility of Results |
| مستخلص: | Purpose: The purpose of this Best Evidence Consensus Statement was to evaluate the existing literature relative to two focus questions: What are the techniques used and their reproducibility in recording centric relation (CR) in a dentate and partially dentate population and what effect do different recording materials have on the reproducibility of CR? Materials and Methods: Keywords used in the initial search were: CR, interocclusal records, CR accuracy, CR reproducibility, and CR technique. The search was then limited to Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Studies, Meta-analyses, and Clinical Trials. Results: Initial search related to the selected search terms resulted in more than 3500 articles. When subsequent search was limited to Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Studies, and Meta-Analysis and Clinical Trials, this resulted in 291 articles selected for further analysis. Conclusions: Techniques using chin point guidance, bimanual manipulation, power centric, Gothic arch tracing, leaf gauge, and anterior deprogramming devices to record CR can all be comparable in precision and clinical accuracy in regards to clinical relevance. Practitioner experience and familiarity with a particular technique is critical for accuracy when recording CR. Polyvinyl siloxane and polyether consistently performed better in the broad range of studies on recording materials. Virtual capture of CR could serve as a comparable recording medium but requires further clinical study. (© 2021 by the American College of Prosthodontists.) |
| References: | Hickey JC: Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. Preface to the Third Edition. J Prosthet Dent 1968;20:443-480. Hickey JC: The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:66-109. Hickey JC: The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:713-762. Hickey JC: The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. The Academy of Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:41-112. Hickey JC: The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:39-110. Hickey JC: The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:10-92. Hickey JC: The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. 9th ed. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117(5S):e1-e105. Goldstein GR, Andrawis M, Choi M, et al: A survey to determine agreement regarding the definition of centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:426-429. Shanahan TE: Physiologic jaw relations and occlusion of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:203-205. Schuyler CH: Intra-oral method of establishing maxillomandibular relation. J Am Dent Assoc 1932;19:1012-1021. Gysi A: The problem of articulation. Dent Cosmos 1910;52:1-19. McCollum BB: Factors that make the mouth and teeth a vital organ. J Am Dent Assoc 1927;14:1261-1271. Dawson PE: Evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of occlusal problems. Missouri, CV Mosby 1989;2:28-55. Remien JC, 2nd, Ash M, Jr: Myo-Monitor centric”: an evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1974;31:137-145. L VO: A technique for recording centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 1964;14:492-505. Long JH: Locating centric relation with a leaf gauge. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:608-610. Roth RH: Functional occlusion for the orthodontist. J Clin Orthod 1981;15:32-40, 4-51. Grasso JE, Sharry J: The duplicability of arrow-point tracings in dentulous subjects. J Prosthet Dent 1968;20:106-115. Kantor ME, Silverman SI, Garfinkel L: Centric-relation recording techniques-a comparative investigation. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:593-600. Strohaver RA: A comparison of articulator mountings made with centric relation and myocentric position records. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:379-390. Levinson E: Centric relation-the anterior biting jig for recording the clenching position. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1982;2:8-21. Celenza FV: The centric position: replacement and character. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:591-598. Azarbal M: Comparison of Myo-Monitor centric position to centric relation and centric occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:331-337. Noble WH: Anteroposterior position of “Myo-Monitor centric. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:398-402. Shafagh I, Amirloo R: Replicability of chinpoint-guidance and anterior programmer for recording centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:402-404. Simon RL, Nicholls JI: Variability of passively recorded centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:21-26. Hobo S, Iwata T: Reproducibility of mandibular centricity in three dimensions. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:649-654. Wood DP, Elliott RW: Reproducibility of the centric relation bite registration technique. Angle Orthod 1994;64:211-220. McKee JR: Comparing condylar position repeatability for standardized versus nonstandardized methods of achieving centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:280-284. Tarantola GJ, Becker IM, Gremillion H: The reproducibility of centric relation: a clinical approach. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:1245-1251. Keshvad A, Winstanley RB: Comparison of the replicability of routinely used centric relation registration techniques. J Prosthodont 2003;12:90-101. Boos RH: Intermaxillary relation established by biting power. J Am Dent Assoc 1940;27:1192-1199. Smith HF, Jr: a comparison of empirical centric relation records with location of terminal hinge axis and apex of the gothic arch tracing. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:511-520. Paixao F, Silva WA, Silva FA, et al: Evaluation of the reproducibility of two techniques used to determine and record centric relation in angle's class I patients. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:275-279. Schmitt ME, Kulbersh R, Freeland T, et al: Reproducibility of the roth power centric in determining centric relation. Seminars in Orthodontics 2003;9:102-108. Cordray FE: Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:619-630. McKee JR: Comparing condylar positions achieved through bimanual manipulation to condylar positions achieved through masticatory muscle contraction against an anterior deprogrammer: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:389-393. Linsen SS, Stark H, Klitzschmuller M: Reproducibility of condyle position and influence of splint therapy on different registration techniques in asymptomatic volunteers. Cranio 2013;31:32-39. Kandasamy S, Boeddinghaus R, Kruger E: Condylar position assessed by magnetic resonance imaging after various bite position registrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:512-517. Galekovic NH, Fugosic V, Braut V, et al: Reproducibility of Centric Relation Techniques by means of Condyle Position Analysis. Acta Stomatol Croat 2017;51:13-21. Tripodakis AP, Vergos VK, Tsoutsos AG: Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:141-146. Assif D, Himel R, Grajower Y: A new electromechanical device to measure the accuracy of interocclusal records. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:672-676. Muller J, Gotz G, Horz W, et al: Study of the accuracy of different recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:41-46. Urstein M, Fitzig S, Moskona D, et al: A clinical evaluation of materials used in registering interjaw relationships. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:372-377. Kong CV, Yang YL, Maness WL: Clinical evaluation of three occlusal registration methods for guided closure contacts. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:15-20. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Kinderknecht KE: Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:265-270. Campos AA, Nathanson D: Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:456-461. Eriksson A, Ockert-Eriksson G, Lockowandt P, et al: Clinical factors and clinical variation influencing the reproducibility of interocclusal recording methods. Br Dent J 2002;192:395-400. Utz KH, Muller F, Luckerath W, et al: Accuracy of check-bite registration and centric condylar position. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:458-466. Vergos VK, Tripodakis AP: Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:365-368. Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, et al: An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part III: resistance to compression after setting. J Prosthodont 2004;13:233-237. Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, et al: An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part II: linear dimensional change and accompanying weight change. J Prosthodont 2004;13:150-159. Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M: The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:816-820. Ghazal M, Hedderich J, Kern M: An in vitro study of condylar displacement caused by interocclusal records: influence of recording material, storage time, and recording technique. J Prosthodont 2017;26:587-593. Sweeney S, Smith DK, Messersmith M: Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:245-252. Ury E, Fornai C, Weber GW: Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:305-313. Stafeev A, Ryakhovsky A, Petrov P, et al: Comparative analysis of the reproduction accuracy of main methods for finding the mandible position in the centric relation using digital research method. Comparison between analog-to-digital and digital methods: a preliminary report. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:933-942. Radu M, Radu D, Abboud M: Digital recording of a conventionally determined centric relation: a technique using an intraoral scanner. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:228-231. Jaschouz S, Mehl A: Reproducibility of habitual intercuspation in vivo. J Dent 2014;42:210-218. Abdulateef S, Edher F, Hannam AG, et al: Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of virtual interocclusal records. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:667-673. |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Centric relation; centric relation accuracy; centric relation reproducibility; centric relation technique; interocclusal records |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20210330 Date Completed: 20210331 Latest Revision: 20210331 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20221213 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jopr.13321 |
| PMID: | 33783085 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1532-849X |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1111/jopr.13321 |