دورية أكاديمية
Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Scores Predict Patients Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Early Postoperative Time Period After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
| العنوان: | Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Scores Predict Patients Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Early Postoperative Time Period After Total Knee Arthroplasty. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Darrith B; From the Department of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI., Khalil LS, Franovic S, Bazydlo M, Weir RM, Banka TR, Davis JJ |
| المصدر: | The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons [J Am Acad Orthop Surg] 2021 Dec 15; Vol. 29 (24), pp. e1417-e1426. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9417468 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1940-5480 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1067151X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: 2016- : Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Original Publication: Rosemont, IL : American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, c1993- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee*, Global Health ; Humans ; Information Systems ; Minimal Clinically Important Difference ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Postoperative Period ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome |
| مستخلص: | Introduction: The patient-specific factors influencing postoperative improvement after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are important considerations for the surgeon and patient. The primary purpose of this study was to determine which patient demographic factors influence the postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health (GH) scores. In addition, we aimed to compare the prognostic utility of preoperative PROMIS-GH scores and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) in predicting postoperative improvement. Methods: This retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of patients who underwent primary, unilateral TKA analyzed prospectively collected KOOS-JR and PROMIS-GH surveys. PROMIS-GH includes physical health (PH) and mental health scores. Patient demographic and presurgical characteristics were evaluated for prognostic capability in predicting postoperative improvement in the PROMIS scores and achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to understand the prognostic thresholds of the preoperative PROMIS score and KOOS-JR for predicting MCID achievement. Results: A total of 872 patients were included. Although unadjusted analyses showed associations between patient demographic factors and PROMIS-PH scores, multivariable regression analysis for predictors of MCID achievement demonstrated that PROMIS-PH was the only significant preoperative variable. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the area under the curve of PROMIS-PH (0.70; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.74) was less than that of the KOOS-JR (0.77; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.81; P = 0.032). Sensitivity and specificity for achieving the MCID were maximized for preoperative PROMIS-PH scores of ≤ 38 (59% and 70%) and for preoperative KOOS-JR ≤ 51 (71% and 69%). Conclusions: Preoperative KOOS-JR and PROMIS-PH scores predict clinically meaningful improvement after TKA. The KOOS-JR has greater prognostic utility in the early postoperative period. Level of Evidence: Level III, Prognostic Study. (Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.) |
| References: | Sakellariou VI, Poultsides LA, Ma Y, Bae J, Liu S, Sculco TP: Risk assessment for chronic pain and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2016;39:55-62. Boraiah S, Joo L, Inneh IA, et al.: Management of modifiable risk factors prior to primary hip and knee arthroplasty: A readmission risk assessment tool. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97:1921-1928. Kim KY, Anoushiravani AA, Chen KK, et al.: Perioperative orthopedic surgical home: Optimizing total joint arthroplasty candidates and preventing readmission. J Arthroplasty 2019;34:S91-S96. Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Ong KL, Adler EM, Kolisek FR, Manley MT: Which clinical and patient factors influence the national economic burden of hospital readmissions after total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475:2926-2937. Harmelink KEM, Zeegers A, Hullegie W, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, Staal JB: Are there prognostic factors for one-year outcome after total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:3840-3853.e3841. Abdel MP, Bonadurer GF III, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD: Increased aseptic tibial failures in patients with a BMI >35 and well-aligned total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2015;30:2181-2184. Riddle DL, Golladay GJ, Hayes A, Ghomrawi HM: Poor expectations of knee replacement benefit are associated with modifiable psychological factors and influence the decision to have surgery: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of a community-based sample. Knee 2017;24:354-361. Fontana MA, Lyman S, Sarker GK, Padgett DE, MacLean CH: Can machine learning algorithms predict which patients will achieve minimally clinically important differences from total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019;477:1267-1279. Gagnier JJ, Mullins M, Huang H, et al.: A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:1688-1697. Roos EM, Lohmander LS: The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): From joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:64. Lyman S, Lee YY, McLawhorn AS, Islam W, MacLean CH: What are the minimal and substantial improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR versions after total joint replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018;476:2432-2441. Brodke DJ, Saltzman CL, Brodke DS: PROMIS for orthopaedic outcomes measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016;24:744-749. Fidai MS, Saltzman BM, Meta F, et al.: Patient-reported outcomes measurement information System and legacy patient-reported outcome measures in the field of orthopaedics: A systematic review. Arthroscopy 2018;34:605-614. Kenney RJ, Houck J, Giordano BD, Baumhauer JF, Herbert M, Maloney MD: Do patient reported outcome measurement information System (PROMIS) scales demonstrate responsiveness as well as disease-specific scales in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy? Am J Sports Med 2019;47:1396-1403. Khalil LS, Darrith B, Franovic S, Davis JJ, Weir RM, Banka TR: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health short forms demonstrate responsiveness in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2020;35:1540-1544. Padilla JA, Rudy HL, Gabor JA, et al.: Relationship between the patient-reported outcome measurement information system and traditional patient-reported outcomes for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2019;34:265-272. Berliner JL, Brodke DJ, Chan V, SooHoo NF, Bozic KJ: Can preoperative patient-reported outcome measures be used to predict meaningful improvement in function after TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475:149-157. Connelly JW, Galea VP, Rojanasopondist P, et al.: Patient Acceptable symptom state at 1 and 3 years after total knee arthroplasty: Thresholds for the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101:995-1003. Connelly JW, Galea VP, Rojanasopondist P, et al.: Which preoperative factors are associated with not attaining acceptable levels of pain and function after TKA? Findings from an international multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020;478:1019-1028. Rojanasopondist P, Galea VP, Connelly JW, et al.: What preoperative factors are associated with not achieving a minimum clinically important difference after THA? Findings from an international multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019;477:1301-1312. Anderson MR, Houck JR, Saltzman CL, et al.: Validation and generalizability of preoperative PROMIS scores to predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Int 2018;39:763-770. Chen RE, Papuga MO, Nicandri GT, Miller RJ, Voloshin I: Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores predict postoperative outcome in total shoulder arthroplasty patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28:547-554. Chen RE, Papuga MO, Voloshin I, et al.: Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative outcomes after primary ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2018;6:2325967118771286. Berliner JL, Brodke DJ, Chan V, SooHoo NF, Bozic KJ: John charnley award: Preoperative patient-reported outcome measures predict clinically meaningful improvement in function after THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016;474:321-329. Culliton SE, Bryant DM, Overend TJ, MacDonald SJ, Chesworth BM: The relationship between expectations and satisfaction in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:490-492. Husain A, Lee GC: Establishing realistic patient expectations following total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015;23:707-713. Canfield M, Savoy L, Cote MP, Halawi MJ: Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: Defining the optimal collection window. Arthroplast Today 2020;6:62-67. |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20210601 Date Completed: 20211209 Latest Revision: 20230714 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| DOI: | 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01288 |
| PMID: | 34061813 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1940-5480 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01288 |