دورية أكاديمية

Comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparative study between suprasternal and apical windows: a user-friendly cardiac output measurement for the anesthesiologist.
المؤلفون: Souza RSE; Hospital das Cl.ínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (HC/UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: ssoutorafaela@gmail.com., Melo WB; Hospital das Cl.ínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (HC/UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil., Freire CMV; Hospital das Cl.ínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (HC/UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil., Vilas Boas WW; Hospital das Cl.ínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (HC/UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
المصدر: Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) [Braz J Anesthesiol] 2023 Jul-Aug; Vol. 73 (4), pp. 373-379. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 09.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Elsevier Editora Ltda Country of Publication: Brazil NLM ID: 101624623 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2352-2291 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 01040014 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Braz J Anesthesiol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Rio de Janeiro : Elsevier Editora Ltda, 2013-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Anesthesiologists* , Echocardiography*/methods, Humans ; Cardiac Output/physiology ; Hemodynamics ; Heart
مستخلص: Introduction: Transthoracic echocardiography is a safe and readily available tool for noninvasive monitoring of Cardiac Output (CO). The use of the suprasternal window situated at the sternal notch can be an alternative approach for estimating blood flow. The present study aimed to compare two methods of CO calculation. We compared the descending aorta Velocity-Time Integral (VTI) measurement from the suprasternal window view with the standard technique to determine CO that uses VTI measurements from the LVOT (Left Ventricular Outflow Tract) view. We also aimed to find out whether after basic training a non-echocardiographer operator can obtain reproducible measurements of VTI using this approach.
Methods: In the first part of the study, 26 patients without known cardiovascular diseases were evaluated and VTI data were acquired from the suprasternal window by a non-echocardiographer and an echocardiographer. Next, 17 patients were evaluated by an echocardiographer only and VTI and CO measurements were obtained from suprasternal and apical windows. Data were analyzed using the Bland and Altman method (BA), correlation and regression.
Results: We found a strong correlation between measurements obtained by a non-expert and an expert echocardiographer and detected that an inexperienced trainee can acquire VTI measurements from the suprasternal window view. Regarding agreement between CO measurements, data obtained showed a positive correlation and the Bland and Altman analysis presented a total variation of 38.9%.
Conclusion: Regarding accuracy, it is likely that TTE (Transthoracic Echocardiogram) measurements of CO from the suprasternal window view are comparable to other minimally invasive techniques currently available. Due to its user-friendliness and low cost, it can be a convenient technique for obtaining perioperative hemodynamic measurements, even by inexperienced operators.
(Copyright © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
References: J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):40-56. (PMID: 25559474)
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan - Feb;69(1):20-26. (PMID: 30413278)
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):177-85. (PMID: 25251758)
J Clin Monit Comput. 1999 Feb;15(2):85-91. (PMID: 12578081)
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Jun;13(3):294-6. (PMID: 17468561)
Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1220-35. (PMID: 20881596)
Circulation. 1984 Sep;70(3):425-31. (PMID: 6744546)
Intern Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):163-71. (PMID: 22147648)
Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):707-10. (PMID: 19224773)
Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):887-97. (PMID: 19224798)
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;49(1):25-31. (PMID: 27404397)
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10. (PMID: 2868172)
Anaesthesia. 2012 Nov;67(11):1266-71. (PMID: 22928650)
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Jan;58(1):80-8. (PMID: 24192143)
Anaesthesia. 2014 Jul;69(7):764-76. (PMID: 24773366)
Lancet. 2005 Aug 6-12;366(9484):472-7. (PMID: 16084255)
Anesth Analg. 2010 Mar 1;110(3):799-811. (PMID: 20185659)
J Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):461-80. (PMID: 26961819)
JAMA. 2003 Nov 26;290(20):2713-20. (PMID: 14645314)
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):298-310. (PMID: 28203792)
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 2;348(1):5-14. (PMID: 12510037)
Physiol Rep. 2017 Apr;5(8):. (PMID: 28438984)
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015 Oct;34(5):271-6. (PMID: 26388504)
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Jan;32(1):1-64. (PMID: 30282592)
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Feb;25(2):135-43. (PMID: 17672920)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Cardiac output; Doppler ultrasonography; Echocardiogram; Non-invasive monitoring
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20210711 Date Completed: 20230710 Latest Revision: 20230724
رمز التحديث: 20240829
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10362443
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.063
PMID: 34246688
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2352-2291
DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.063