دورية أكاديمية
Quality of Life After Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review with Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.
| العنوان: | Quality of Life After Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review with Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Małczak P; Department of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Medyczna 7 , 30-688, Cracow, Poland., Mizera M; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Lee Y; Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada., Pisarska-Adamczyk M; Department of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Medyczna 7 , 30-688, Cracow, Poland. magdalenapisarska@interia.pl., Wysocki M; Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital in Cracow, Cracow, Poland., Bała MM; Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Witowski J; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Rubinkiewicz M; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Dudek A; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Stefura T; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Torbicz G; Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital in Cracow, Cracow, Poland., Tylec P; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Gajewska N; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Vongsurbchart T; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Su M; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Major P; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland., Pędziwiatr M; 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland. |
| المصدر: | Obesity surgery [Obes Surg] 2021 Dec; Vol. 31 (12), pp. 5213-5223. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 11. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Springer Science + Business Media Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9106714 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1708-0428 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09608923 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Obes Surg Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: 2006- : New York : Springer Science + Business Media Original Publication: Oxford, OX, UK : Rapid Communications of Oxford, [1991- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Bariatric Surgery* , Gastric Bypass*/methods , Laparoscopy*/methods , Obesity, Morbid*/surgery, Bayes Theorem ; Gastrectomy/methods ; Humans ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Quality of Life ; Treatment Outcome |
| مستخلص: | Objective: Comprehensive analysis and comparison of HRQoL following different bariatric interventions through systematic review with network meta-analysis. Background: Different types of bariatric surgeries have been developed throughout the years. Apart from weight loss and comorbidities remission, improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important outcome of metabolic surgery. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases have been searched up to April 2020. Inclusion criteria to the analysis were (1) study with at least 2 arms comparing bariatric surgeries; (2) reporting of HRQoL with a validated tool; (3) follow-up period of 1, 2, 3, or 5 years. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Bayesian statistics. The primary outcome was HRQoL. Results: Forty-seven studies were included in the analysis involving 26,629 patients and 11 different surgeries such as sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), gastric bypass (LRYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and other. At 1 year, there was significant difference in HRQoL in favor of LSG, LRYGB, and OAG compared with lifestyle intervention (SMD: 0.44; 95% CrI 0.2 to 0.68 for LSG, SMD: 0.56; 95% CrI 0.31 to 0.8 for LRYGB; and SMD: 0.43; 95% CrI 0.06 to 0.8 for OAGB). At 5 years, LSG, LRYGB, and OAGB showed better HRQoL compared to control (SMD: 0.92; 95% CrI 0.58 to 1.26, SMD: 1.27; 95% CrI 0.94 to 1.61, and SMD: 1.01; 95% CrI 0.63 to 1.4, respectively). Conclusions: LSG and LRYGB may lead to better HRQoL across most follow-up time points. Long-term analysis shows that bariatric intervention results in better HRQoL than non-surgical interventions. (© 2021. The Author(s).) |
| References: | Rajan TM, Menon V. Psychiatric disorders and obesity: a review of association studies. J Postgrad Med. 2017;63(3):182–90. (PMID: 286958715525483) Fiorani C, et al. Long-term quality of life outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-a comparative study. Obes Surg. 2020. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83. (PMID: 15939141593914) Moorehead MK, et al. The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003;13(5):684–92. (PMID: 14627461) Eypasch E, et al. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82(2):216–22. (PMID: 7749697) Kolotkin RL, et al. Assessing Impact of Weight on Quality of Life. Obes Res. 1995;3(1):49–56. (PMID: 7712359) Hutton B, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84. (PMID: 26030634) Weiner S, et al. The Bariatric Quality of Life index: a measure of well-being in obesity surgery patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(4):538–45. (PMID: 15954234) Therrien F, et al. The Laval Questionnaire: a new instrument to measure quality of life in morbid obesity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:66. (PMID: 218433263168398) Velanovich V. The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20(2):130–4. The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28(3):551–8. Yiengprugsawan V, Kelly M, Tawatsupa B. SF-8TM Health Survey. In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands; 2014. p. 5940–2. Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 1998;8(5):487–99. (PMID: 9819079) Niero M, et al. A new approach to multicultural item generation in the development of two obesity-specific measures: the Obesity and Weight Loss Quality of Life (OWLQOL) questionnaire and the Weight-Related Symptom Measure (WRSM). Clin Ther. 2002;24(4):690–700. (PMID: 12017412) Fu R, et al. Handling continuous outcomes in quantitative synthesis. In Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. AHRQ Publication: Oregon; 2013. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell J. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing The Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-analyses. Ottawa Health Research Institute Web site; 2014. 7. Higgins JP, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. (PMID: 2200821722008217) Dias S, et al. Network meta-analysis for decision making. 2018. Thorlund K, et al. Pooling health-related quality of life outcomes in meta-analysis-a tutorial and review of methods for enhancing interpretability. Res Synth Methods. 2011;2(3):188–203. (PMID: 26061786) Shi HY, et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(7):1275–82. (PMID: 18454301) Lee WJ, et al. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparison. Obes Surg. 2004;14(5):626–34. (PMID: 15186629) Lee W-J, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):20–8. (PMID: 159730971357700) Muller M, et al. Quality of life after bariatric surgery-a comparative study of laparoscopic banding vs. bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18(12):1551–7. (PMID: 18461420) Campos GM, et al. Better weight loss, resolution of diabetes, and quality of life for laparoscopic gastric bypass vs banding: results of a 2-cohort pair-matched study. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2011;146(2):149–55. Svanevik M, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures 2 years after standard and distal gastric bypass—a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):606–14. (PMID: 28865057) Alley JB, et al. Quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):31–40. (PMID: 21620778) Lee WJ, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34. (PMID: 23011462) Carlin AM, et al. The comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2013;257(5):791–7. (PMID: 23470577) Karlsen TI, et al. Health related quality of life after gastric bypass or intensive lifestyle intervention: a controlled clinical study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013; 11(1). O’Brien PE, et al. Intensive medical weight loss or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of mild to moderate obesity: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomised trial. Obes Surg. 2013;23(9):1345–53. (PMID: 23760764) Kaseja K, Majewski WD, Kolpiewicz B. A comparison of efectiveness, and an assessment of the quality of life of patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2014;60(2):7–12. (PMID: 26591099) Duarte MIXDT, et al. Impact on quality of life, weight loss and comorbidities: a study comparing the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and the banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014;51(4):320–7. (PMID: 25591161) Strain GW, et al. The effects of weight loss after bariatric surgery on health-related quality of life and depression. Nutr Diabetes. 2014;4:e132. (PMID: 251779124183970) Schauer P, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(21):2002–13. (PMID: 246790605451259) Bhandari M, et al. Comparison between banded and nonbanded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 2-year follow-up: a preliminary retrospective analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(1):213–8. (PMID: 26482162) Major P, et al. Quality of life after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(9):1703–10. (PMID: 256761564522031) Lee WJ, et al. Medium-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a matched comparison with gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1431–8. (PMID: 25648253) Barr AC, et al. GERD and acid reduction medication use following gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):410–5. (PMID: 27287901) Bužgová R, et al. Evaluation of quality of life, clinical parameters, and psychological distress after bariatric surgery: comparison of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic greater curvature plication. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2016;11(4):169–76. Figura A, et al. Improvement in self-reported eating-related psychopathology and physical health-related quality of life after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a pre-post analysis and comparison with conservatively treated patients with obesity. Eat Behav. 2017;24:17–25. (PMID: 27951428) Risstad H, et al. Standard vs distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with body mass index 50 to 60: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):1146–55. (PMID: 27626242) Ignat M, et al. Randomized trial of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in achieving excess weight loss. Br J Surg. 2017;104(3):248–56. (PMID: 27901287) Janik MR, et al. Quality of life and bariatric surgery: cross-sectional study and analysis of factors influencing outcome. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):2849–55. (PMID: 271795205118395) Nickel F, et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life improves significantly after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-a prospective cross-sectional study within a 2-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1292–7. (PMID: 27878423) Omotosho P, et al. Gastric bypass significantly improves quality of life in morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(7):2857–64. (PMID: 268230534912933) Panosian J, et al. Physical activity in obese type 2 diabetes after gastric bypass or medical management. Am J Med. 2017;130(1):83–92. (PMID: 27555097) Accardi R, et al. Different quality of life outcomes between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2017;12(1):29–34. Elrefai M, et al. Quality of life after bariatric surgery: comparison of four different surgical procedures. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2017;12(2):61–6. Biter LU, et al. Quality of life 1 year after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial focusing on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2557–65. (PMID: 28474319) Peterli R, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-Y-gastric bypass for morbid obesity-3-year outcomes of the prospective randomized Swiss Multicenter Bypass Or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS). Ann Surg. 2017;265(3):466–73. (PMID: 28170356) Svanevik M, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures 2 years after standard and distal gastric bypass-a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):606–14. (PMID: 28865057) Versteegden DPA, Van Himbeeck MJJ, Nienhuijs SW. Improvement in quality of life after bariatric surgery: sleeve versus bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(2):170–4. (PMID: 29150392) Schauer PR, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51. (PMID: 281998055451258) Salminen P, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):241–54. (PMID: 58335505833550) Homan J, et al. A longer biliopancreatic limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass improves weight loss in the first years after surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3744–55. (PMID: 30073496) Peterli R, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65. (PMID: 58335465833546) Elias K, et al. Changes in bowel habits and patient-scored symptoms after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(2):144–9. (PMID: 29108895) Silva JN, et al. How is bariatric surgery improving the quality of life of obese patients: a Portuguese cross-sectional study. Acta Med Port. 2018;31(7–8):391–8. (PMID: 30189167) Catheline JM, et al. Prospective, multicentric, comparative study between sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 277 patients, 3 years follow-up. J Visc Surg. 2019;156(6):497–506. (PMID: 31103560) Nabil TM, et al. Conventional versus distal laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2019;29(10):3103–10. (PMID: 31177364) Skogar ML, Sundbom M. Early complications, long-term adverse events, and quality of life after duodenal switch and gastric bypass in a matched national cohort. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020. Lechaux D, Le Foll D, Rascle O. Weight loss and quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy or one-anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a prospective study of 120 women with morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2020. Monpellier VM, et al. Health-related quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy equal to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients? Qual Life Res. 2020. Poelemeijer YQM, et al. Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study. Surg Endosc. 2020. Park CH, et al. Comparative efficacy of bariatric surgery in the treatment of morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29(7):2180–90. Lindekilde N, et al. The impact of bariatric surgery on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(8):639–51. (PMID: 26094664) Hu Z, et al. A comprehensive comparison of LRYGB and LSG in obese patients including the effects on QoL, comorbidities, weight loss, and complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2020;30(3):819–27. (PMID: 31834563) Lee Y, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss, comorbidities, and biochemical outcomes from randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2019. Campos GM, et al. Better weight loss, resolution of diabetes, and quality of life for laparoscopic gastric bypass vs banding: results of a 2-cohort pair-matched study. Arch Surg. 2011;146(2):149–55. (PMID: 21339424) Homan J, et al. Treatment of vitamin and mineral deficiencies after biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch: a major challenge. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):234–41. (PMID: 28861696) Shoar S, et al. Banded versus nonbanded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(5):688–95. (PMID: 31255232) Boerboom A, et al. A long biliopancreatic and short alimentary limb results in more weight loss in revisional RYGB surgery. Outcomes of the randomized controlled ELEGANCE REDO trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(1):60–9. (PMID: 30471927) Boerboom A, et al. A long biliopancreatic and short alimentary limb results in more weight loss in revisional RYGB surgery. Outcomes of the randomized controlled ELEGANCE REDO trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(1):60–9. (PMID: 30471927) Moon RC, et al. Short-term results of long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-is it superior? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(4):492–6. (PMID: 31987734) Rutledge R, Kular K, Manchanda N. The mini-gastric bypass original technique. Int J Surg. 2019;61:38–41. (PMID: 30476553) Poublon N, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2020. Ramos AC, et al. IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) Consensus Conference Statement on One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): results of a modified Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1625–34. (PMID: 32152841) Robert M, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1299–309. (PMID: 30851879) Strain GW, et al. The impact of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) over 9 years. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):787–94. (PMID: 27686233) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Network meta-analysis; Quality of life |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20211011 Date Completed: 20220309 Latest Revision: 20220309 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC8595157 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11695-021-05687-1 |
| PMID: | 34633614 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1708-0428 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11695-021-05687-1 |