دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Interpretation of Thoracic Radiography Shows Large Discrepancies Depending on the Qualification of the Physician-Quantitative Evaluation of Interobserver Agreement in a Representative Emergency Department Scenario.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Interpretation of Thoracic Radiography Shows Large Discrepancies Depending on the Qualification of the Physician-Quantitative Evaluation of Interobserver Agreement in a Representative Emergency Department Scenario.
المؤلفون: Rudolph J; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Fink N; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.; Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany., Dinkel J; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.; Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany.; Department of Radiology, Asklepios Fachklinik München, Robert-Koch-Allee 2, 82131 Gauting, Germany., Koliogiannis V; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Schwarze V; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Goller S; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Erber B; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Geyer T; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Hoppe BF; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Fischer M; Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Ben Khaled N; Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Jörgens M; Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Ricke J; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Rueckel J; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany., Sabel BO; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
المصدر: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) [Diagnostics (Basel)] 2021 Oct 11; Vol. 11 (10). Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 11.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: MDPI AG Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101658402 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2075-4418 (Print) Linking ISSN: 20754418 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Diagnostics (Basel) Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Basel, Switzerland : MDPI AG, [2011]-
مستخلص: (1) Background: Chest radiography (CXR) is still a key diagnostic component in the emergency department (ED). Correct interpretation is essential since some pathologies require urgent treatment. This study quantifies potential discrepancies in CXR analysis between radiologists and non-radiology physicians in training with ED experience. (2) Methods: Nine differently qualified physicians (three board-certified radiologists [BCR], three radiology residents [RR], and three non-radiology residents involved in ED [NRR]) evaluated a series of 563 posterior-anterior CXR images by quantifying suspicion for four relevant pathologies: pleural effusion, pneumothorax, pneumonia, and pulmonary nodules. Reading results were noted separately for each hemithorax on a Likert scale (0-4; 0: no suspicion of pathology, 4: safe existence of pathology) adding up to a total of 40,536 reported pathology suspicions. Interrater reliability/correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed for statistical analysis. (3) Results: While interrater reliability was good among radiologists, major discrepancies between radiologists' and non-radiologists' reading results could be observed in all pathologies. Highest overall interrater agreement was found for pneumothorax detection and lowest agreement in raising suspicion for malignancy suspicious nodules. Pleural effusion and pneumonia were often suspected with indifferent choices (1-3). In terms of pneumothorax detection, all readers mainly decided for a clear option (0 or 4). Interrater reliability was usually higher when evaluating the right hemithorax (all pathologies except pneumothorax). (4) Conclusions: Quantified CXR interrater reliability analysis displays a general uncertainty and strongly depends on medical training. NRR can benefit from radiology reporting in terms of time efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. CXR evaluation of long-time trained ED specialists has not been tested.
References: Crit Care. 2017 Dec 28;21(1):325. (PMID: 29282107)
Invest Radiol. 2020 Dec;55(12):792-798. (PMID: 32694453)
Ann Thorac Med. 2019 Oct-Dec;14(4):226-238. (PMID: 31620206)
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018 Jun;99(6):361-370. (PMID: 29735257)
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191095. (PMID: 30901052)
Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5341-5348. (PMID: 30915557)
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002697. (PMID: 30457991)
Radiology. 1995 Apr;195(1):245-6. (PMID: 7892479)
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):460-5. (PMID: 16704388)
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 23;16:136. (PMID: 27005684)
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Mar 27;2019:4180949. (PMID: 31049186)
Thorax. 2015 Jul;70(7):653-8. (PMID: 25918121)
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Aug;56(529):574-8. (PMID: 16882374)
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):541-2. (PMID: 24454995)
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2):545-558. (PMID: 22315122)
Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1359-1368. (PMID: 31748854)
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002686. (PMID: 30457988)
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):223-42. (PMID: 26910112)
Clin Radiol. 2017 Jun;72(6):519.e1-519.e9. (PMID: 28236438)
Radiology. 2019 Jan;290(1):218-228. (PMID: 30251934)
Invest Radiol. 2021 Aug 4;:. (PMID: 34352804)
Radiology. 2000 Nov;217(2):456-9. (PMID: 11058645)
Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1486-9. (PMID: 8222812)
Cell. 2018 Feb 22;172(5):1122-1131.e9. (PMID: 29474911)
Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul;48(7):e574-e583. (PMID: 32433121)
JAAPA. 2019 Oct;32(10):18-23. (PMID: 31513034)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: chest radiography; clinicians; emergency department; interrater reliability; radiologists
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20211023 Latest Revision: 20211026
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC8534346
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101868
PMID: 34679566
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2075-4418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics11101868