دورية أكاديمية

Mechanical active compression-decompression versus standard mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomised haemodynamic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Mechanical active compression-decompression versus standard mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomised haemodynamic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study.
المؤلفون: Berve PO; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Prehospital Emergency Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Air Ambulance Department, Division of Prehospital Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: peolbe@ous-hf.no., Hardig BM; Clinical Sciences, Helsingborg, Section II, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden; Stryker/Jolife AB, Lund, Sweden., Skålhegg T; Air Ambulance Department, Division of Prehospital Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway., Kongsgaard H; Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Prehospital Emergency Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway., Kramer-Johansen J; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Prehospital Emergency Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Air Ambulance Department, Division of Prehospital Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway., Wik L; Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Prehospital Emergency Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Air Ambulance Department, Division of Prehospital Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
المصدر: Resuscitation [Resuscitation] 2022 Jan; Vol. 170, pp. 1-10. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 25.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Elsevier/north-Holland Biomedical Press Country of Publication: Ireland NLM ID: 0332173 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-1570 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03009572 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Resuscitation Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Limerick : Elsevier/north-Holland Biomedical Press
Original Publication: London, Middlesex Pub. Co.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation*/methods , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest*/therapy , Thoracic Wall*, Adult ; Decompression ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Prospective Studies
مستخلص: Background: Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) utilises a suction cup to lift the chest-wall actively during the decompression phase (AD). We hypothesised that mechanical ACD-CPR (Intervention), with AD up to 30 mm above the sternal resting position, would generate better haemodynamic results than standard mechanical CPR (Control).
Methods: This out-of-hospital adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest trial was prospective, block-randomised and non-blinded. We included intubated patients with capnography recorded during mechanical CPR. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, prisoners, and prior chest surgery. The primary endpoint was maximum tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (p MT CO 2 ) and secondary endpoints were oxygen saturation of cerebral tissue (SctO 2 ), invasive arterial blood pressures and CPR-related injuries. Intervention device lifting force performance was categorised as Complete AD (≥30 Newtons) or Incomplete AD (≤10 Newtons). Haemodynamic data, analysed as one measurement for each parameter per ventilation (Observation Unit, OU) with non-linear regression statistics are reported as mean (standard deviation). A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results: Of 221 enrolled patients, 210 were deemed eligible (Control 109, Intervention 101). The Control vs. Intervention results showed no significant differences for p MT CO 2 : 29(17) vs 29(18) mmHg (p = 0.86), blood pressures during compressions: 111(45) vs. 101(68) mmHg (p = 0.93) and decompressions: 21(20) vs. 18(18) mmHg (p = 0.93) or for SctO 2 %: 55(36) vs. 57(9) (p = 0.42). The 48 patients who received Complete AD in > 50% of their OUs had higher SctO 2 than Control patients: 58(11) vs. 55(36)% (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Mechanical ACD-CPR provided similar haemodynamic results to standard mechanical CPR. The Intervention device did not consistently provide Complete AD.
Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02479152. The Haemodynamic Effects of Mechanical Standard and Active Chest Compression-decompression During Out-of-hospital CPR.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest LW was PI in the Zoll Medical funded CIRC study and holds patents via Oslo University Hospital (Inven2). He is a member of the medical advisory board of Stryker/Physio-Control. At the time of the study, BMH was employed by Stryker/Jolife AB, which manufactures the LUCAS device, LIFEPAK 15 and CODE-STAT. In addition, JC did analysis and data work for the study that was funded by Stryker/Jolife AB. POB, TS, HK and JKJ declare no conflicts of interests.
(Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: ACD-CPR; Active compression decompression; Capnography; Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Cerebral oximetry; ETCO(2); Haemodynamic; Invasive arterial blood pressure; Mechanical chest compression; NIRS; SctO(2); rSO(2)
سلسلة جزيئية: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02479152
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20211028 Date Completed: 20220324 Latest Revision: 20220324
رمز التحديث: 20221213
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.026
PMID: 34710550
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1873-1570
DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.026