دورية أكاديمية
Life cycle environmental impacts of regeneration options for anion exchange resin remediation of PFAS impacted water.
العنوان: | Life cycle environmental impacts of regeneration options for anion exchange resin remediation of PFAS impacted water. |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Boyer TH; School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment (SSEBE), Arizona State University (ASU), Tempe, AZ 85287, United States. Electronic address: thboyer@asu.edu., Ellis A; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States., Fang Y; CDM Smith, Edison, New Jersey 08837, United States., Schaefer CE; CDM Smith, Edison, New Jersey 08837, United States., Higgins CP; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States., Strathmann TJ; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States. |
المصدر: | Water research [Water Res] 2021 Dec 01; Vol. 207, pp. 117798. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 25. |
نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
اللغة: | English |
بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Pergamon Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0105072 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1879-2448 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00431354 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Water Res Subsets: MEDLINE |
أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Oxford, Pergamon Press. |
مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Anion Exchange Resins* , Fluorocarbons*/analysis, Animals ; Environment ; Incineration ; Life Cycle Stages ; Water |
مستخلص: | Although anion exchange resin (AER) treatment is considered an effective technology for removing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) from impacted water, the environmental impacts associated with AER regeneration have not been systematically explored. In particular, the trade-offs of altering the composition of the regeneration solution and disposing of or recycling the waste regeneration solution are not known. To fill these important gaps in the literature, this research conducted a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of an AER-based PFAS remediation system with different regeneration scenarios including disposing of waste regeneration solution via incineration, reusing the organic cosolvent and brine fractions of the waste regeneration solution, and altering the composition of the regeneration solution to avoid organic cosolvent or NaCl. The results show that disposing of waste regeneration solution via incineration, without recycling organic cosolvent or brine, had the greatest environmental impact, and that incineration accounted for the greatest impact among contributing processes. Recycling of the cosolvent (or cosolvent and brine) fraction of the waste regeneration solution resulted in lower environmental impacts due to reduced mass of waste disposed of via incineration. Replacing NaCl in the brine with an alternative salt resulted in higher environmental impacts, with salts derived from chemical production, such as ammonium chloride and potassium carbonate, showing the largest increases in impacts. The results of this research highlight the importance of understanding the fate of PFASs during incineration, and the need for PFAS destruction technologies that can be coupled to AER regeneration to avoid incineration. (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.) |
فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Groundwater remediation; Incineration; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Methanol; Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS); Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) |
المشرفين على المادة: | 0 (Anion Exchange Resins) 0 (Fluorocarbons) 059QF0KO0R (Water) |
تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20211112 Date Completed: 20211208 Latest Revision: 20211214 |
رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117798 |
PMID: | 34768102 |
قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
تدمد: | 1879-2448 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117798 |