دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Comprehensive well-being scale: development and validation among Chinese in recovery of mental illness in Hong Kong.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comprehensive well-being scale: development and validation among Chinese in recovery of mental illness in Hong Kong.
المؤلفون: Sham WWL; New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association, 332 Nam Cheong Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China., Yeung GTY; New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association, 332 Nam Cheong Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. gladysyeung@nlpra.org.hk., Mak WWS; Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China., Powell CLYM; New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association, 332 Nam Cheong Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
المصدر: BMC psychology [BMC Psychol] 2021 Nov 13; Vol. 9 (1), pp. 179. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 13.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101627676 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2050-7283 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20507283 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Psychol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2013]-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Mental Disorders*, China ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Hong Kong ; Humans ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires
مستخلص: Background: Given the absence of a brief scale that reconciles and encompasses different conceptual definitions of well-being (physical, psychological, social and spiritual), the present research aimed at developing and validating a Comprehensive Well-Being Scale (CWBS) that encompasses these different conceptual definition and extend the definition of well-being to transcendental well-being among individuals in recovery of mental illness. The present research focuses on testing the scale among people in recovery of mental illness so that a brief and theoretically comprehensive scale would be available for mental health organization to evaluate the well-being of service users, and to develop and evaluate well-being related services.
Methods: A 56-item preliminary well-being scale was developed by a professional panel. In Study 1, 300 mental health service users in Hong Kong were recruited. Twenty items were selected through principal component analysis to form the CWBS. In Study 2, another sample of 300 service users was recruited. Confirmatory factor analysis was done to confirm a two-factor structure. Validity of the scale was also examined.
Results: The CWBS yielded good internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas = .79-.91). The finding supported a two-factor structure, namely Intrapersonal Well-Being, and Transpersonal Well-Being, χ 2 (169) = 335.61, p < .001, CFI = .90, RMSEA = .06, SRMR = .06.
Conclusions: The CWBS established concurrent and construct validity in assessing well-being among Chinese in recovery of mental illness in Hong Kong. It provided theoretical and practical implications for measuring well-being. Theoretically, it extended the concept of well-being to encompass transcendental well-being in model of recovery among individuals recovery from mental illness. Practically, it provided a tool for evaluation of well-being and service development in mental health organization.
(© 2021. The Author(s).)
References: Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141-66. (PMID: 11148302)
Int Rev Econ. 2017 Jun;64(2):159-178. (PMID: 29057014)
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. (PMID: 2320703)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Oct;69(4):719-27. (PMID: 7473027)
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;53(1):95-102. (PMID: 21193179)
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9. (PMID: 12578436)
Indian J Community Med. 2011 Oct;36(4):275-82. (PMID: 22279257)
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 07;6(7):e010641. (PMID: 27388349)
Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45. (PMID: 16443717)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):321-35. (PMID: 8636885)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):1007-22. (PMID: 12051575)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Oct;103(4):663-88. (PMID: 22823292)
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. (PMID: 11392867)
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 03;7:1679. (PMID: 27857698)
Soc Work Health Care. 2005;41(1):33-52. (PMID: 16048855)
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2005 Spring;28(4):378-86. (PMID: 15895922)
Schizophr Bull. 2004;30(4):1035-41. (PMID: 15957202)
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Oct;16(5):457. (PMID: 17012297)
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. (PMID: 16717171)
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007 Aug;195(8):673-80. (PMID: 17700300)
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2005;60(2):127-43. (PMID: 15801386)
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;53(5):584-92. (PMID: 22104556)
Nurs Res. 1996 Mar-Apr;45(2):116-21. (PMID: 8604361)
J Relig Health. 2014 Apr;53(2):382-92. (PMID: 22965652)
Qual Life Res. 2016 May;25(5):1303-11. (PMID: 26459380)
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. (PMID: 11556941)
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Apr;52(4):482-5. (PMID: 11274493)
Behav Ther. 2008 Jun;39(2):107-16. (PMID: 18502244)
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;73(3):539-48. (PMID: 15982151)
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):778-786. (PMID: 28981851)
J Pers Assess. 2010 Mar;92(2):116-27. (PMID: 20155561)
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. (PMID: 19565683)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Chinese; Hong Kong; Personal recovery; Scale development; Validity; Well-being
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20211114 Date Completed: 20211116 Latest Revision: 20211118
رمز التحديث: 20221213
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC8590308
DOI: 10.1186/s40359-021-00686-4
PMID: 34774102
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2050-7283
DOI:10.1186/s40359-021-00686-4