دورية أكاديمية
Can Imaging Predict Hearing Outcomes in Children With Cochleovestibular Nerve Abnormalities?
| العنوان: | Can Imaging Predict Hearing Outcomes in Children With Cochleovestibular Nerve Abnormalities? |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Kari E; Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A., Gillard DM; Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A., Chuang N; Radiology, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, U.S.A., Go JL; Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A. |
| المصدر: | The Laryngoscope [Laryngoscope] 2022 Jun; Vol. 132 Suppl 8, pp. S1-S15. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 10. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8607378 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1531-4995 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0023852X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Laryngoscope Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: <2009- >: Philadelphia, PA : Wiley-Blackwell Original Publication: St. Louis, Mo. : [s.n., 1896- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Cochlear Implantation*/methods , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural*/surgery, Child ; Cochlea/abnormalities ; Cochlear Nerve/diagnostic imaging ; Cochlear Nerve/pathology ; Hearing/physiology ; Humans ; Infant ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Vestibulocochlear Nerve/diagnostic imaging |
| مستخلص: | Objectives/hypothesis: To identify the imaging characteristics associated with better hearing outcomes found in cochleovestibular nerve (CVN) abnormalities treated with hearing aids and/or cochlear implantation (CI). Study Design: Retrospective review. Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken of 69 ears with CVN abnormalities seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) treated at a tertiary referral academic center analyzing the clinical features, imaging characteristics, and hearing data. We searched for associations among the hearing and imaging data, hypothesizing that the imaging data was not a good indicator of hearing function. Results: In univariable analysis of all those who underwent aided testing (hearing aid and CI), health status (P = .016), internal auditory canal (IAC) midpoint diameter (P < .001), and number of nerves in the IAC (P < .001) were predictors of positive hearing outcome. Modiolar abnormalities, cochlear aperture diameter, cochlear malformations, vestibular malformations, and nerves in the cerebellar cistern did not predict hearing outcome (P = .79, .18, .59, .09, .17, respectively). For patients who received CI, health status (P = .018), IAC midpoint (P = .024), and number of nerves in the IAC (P = .038) were significant. When controlling for health status, IAC midpoint diameter (P < .001) and number of nerves in the IAC (P < .001) remained significant. In our cohort, one out of the eight ears (13%) with Birman class 0 or 1 exhibited responses to sound compared to nine out of 13 ears (70%) with Birman class 2-4. Conclusions: Current imaging modalities cannot accurately depict the status of the cochleovestibular nerve or predict a child's benefit with a CI. Cochlear implantation should be considered in children with abnormal cochleovestibular nerves. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:S1-S15, 2022. (© 2022 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.) |
| References: | Marazita ML, Ploughman LM, Rawlings B, Remington E, Arnos KS, Nance WE. Genetic epidemiological studies of early-onset deafness in the U.S. school-age population. Am J Med Genet 1993;46:486-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320460504. Niparko JK, Tobey EA, Thal DJ, et al. Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. JAMA 2012;303:1498-1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yped.2010.12.094. Buchman C, Copeland BJ, Yu KK, Brown CJ, Carrasco VN, Pillsbury HC. Cochlear implantation in children with congenital inner ear malformations. Laryngoscope 2004;114(February):309-316. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200402000-00025. Buchman C, Teagle HFB, Roush PA, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with labyrinthine anomalies and cochlear nerve deficiency: implications for auditory brainstem implantation. Laryngoscope 2011;121:1979-1988. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.22032. Shelton C, Luxford WM, Tonokawa LL, Lo WW, House WF. The narrow internal auditory canal in children: a contraindication to cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;100:227-231. Casselman JW, Offeciers FE, Govaerts PJ, et al. Aplasia and hypoplasia of the vestibulocochlear nerve: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1997;202:773-781. Birman CS, Powell HRF, Gibson WPR, Elliott EJ. Cochlear implant outcomes in cochlea nerve aplasia and hypoplasia. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:438-445. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000997. Kari E, Go JL, Loggins J, Emmanuel N, Fisher LM. Abnormal cochleovestibular anatomy and hearing outcomes: pediatric patients with a questionable cochleovestibular nerve status may benefit from cochlear implantation and/or hearing AIDS. Audiol Neurotol 2018;23:48-57. https://doi.org/10.1159/000488793. Gillard DM, Go JL, Chuang NA, Kari E. Abnormal cochleovestibular anatomy and imaging: variable quality, inconsistent acquisition protocols, and lack of concordance across reviewers. Int J Pediatr Otolaryngol 2020;134:110021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110021. Lane JI, Ward H, Witte RJ, Bernstein M, Driscoll CLW. 3-T imaging of the cochlear nerve and labyrinth in cochlear-implant candidates: 3D fast recovery fast spin-echo versus 3D constructive interference in the steady state techniques. Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25(April):618-622. Adunka OF, Roush PA, Teagle HF, et al. Internal auditory canal morphology in children with cochlear nerve deficiency. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:793-801. Young NM, Kim FM, Ryan ME, Tournis E, Yaras S. Pediatric cochlear implantation of children with eighth nerve deficiency. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:1442-1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.06.019. Kim AH, Kileny PR, Arts A, El-Kashlan H, Telian SA, Zwolan TA. Role of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implantation of children with inner ear malformations. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:626-634. Roland P, Henion K, Booth T, Campbell JD, Sharma A. Assessment of cochlear implant candidacy in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency using the P1 CAEP biomarker. Cochlear Implants Int 2012;13:16-25. https://doi.org/10.1179/146701011X12962268235869. Yamazaki H, Leigh J, Briggs R, Naito Y. Usefulness of MRI and EABR testing for predicting CI outcomes immediately after cochlear implantation in cases with cochlear nerve deficiency. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:977-984. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000721. Colletti L, Colletti G, Mandala M, Colletti V. The therapeutic dilemma of cochlear nerve deficiency: cochlear or brainstem implantation? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;151:308-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814531913. Colletti L, Wilkinson EP, Colletti V. Auditory brainstem implantation after unsuccessful cochlear implantation of children with clincal diagnosis of cochlear nerve deficiency. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013;122:605-612. Wilkinson EP, Eisenberg LS, Krieger MD, et al. Initial results of a safety and feasibility study of auditory brainstem implantation in congenitally deaf children. Otol Neurotol 2017;38:212-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1868.Human. Wilkinson EP, Eisenberg LS, Krieger MD, et al. Initial results of a safety and feasibility study of auditory brainstem implantation in congenitally deaf children. Otol Neurotol 2016;2:212-220. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001287. Eisenberg LS, Ganguly DH, Martinez AS, et al. Early communication development of children with auditory brainstem implants. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2018;23:249-260. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eny010. Niparko JK. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation. JAMA 2004;291:2378-2380. Eisenberg LS, Johnson KC, Martinez AS, et al. Speech recognition at 1-year follow-up in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study: methods and preliminary findings. Audiol Neurotol 2006;11:259-268. https://doi.org/10.1159/000093302. Freeman SR, Sennaroglu L. Management of cochlear nerve hypoplasia and aplasia. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2018;81:81-92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000485542. Siu JM, Blaser S, Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Cushing SL. Efficacy of a selective imaging paradigm prior to pediatric cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2019;129:2627-2633. |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Cochlear nerve aplasia; cochlear implant outcomes; cochlear nerve deficiency; cochleovestibular malformations; congenital hearing loss |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20220111 Date Completed: 20220517 Latest Revision: 20220719 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20221213 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/lary.30008 |
| PMID: | 35015297 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1531-4995 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1002/lary.30008 |