دورية أكاديمية

Effectiveness of the Glass Bead Sterilizer for Sterilizing Surgical Instruments.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Effectiveness of the Glass Bead Sterilizer for Sterilizing Surgical Instruments.
المؤلفون: Skiles B; Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana., Johnston NA; Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana;, Email: johnstna@iu.edu., Hendrix GK; Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana., Hickman DL; Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
المصدر: Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS [J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci] 2022 May 01; Vol. 61 (3), pp. 252-255. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 21.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101269489 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2769-6677 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15596109 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Memphis, TN : American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, [2006]-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Sterilization* , Surgical Instruments*/veterinary, Animals ; Bacteria ; Ethanol
مستخلص: Survival rodent surgery requires the use of sterile instruments for each animal, which can be challenging when performing multiple surgeries on batches of animals. Glass bead sterilizers (GBS) are widely considered to facilitate this practice by sterilizing the tips of the instruments between animals. However, other disciplines have raised questions about the efficacy of the GBS, especially when used with surgical tools that have grooves or ridges that may contain organic debris. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the GBS to sterilize instruments commonly used in rodent surgery by intentionally contaminating a selection of instruments with a standardized bacterial broth inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli . As expected, a simple ethanol wipe was ineffective in sterilizing instruments in all treatment groups. An ethanol wipe followed by GBS was effective in sterilizing 82.5% (99 of 120) of the instruments. Our study suggests that the GBS may not be effective for consistent sterilization of surgical instruments.
References: J Hosp Infect. 1987 Nov;10(3):308-11. (PMID: 2891762)
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Aug 1;45(8):e81-e86. (PMID: 28602275)
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Aug;19(4):250-1. (PMID: 2120369)
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017 Nov;9(Suppl 1):S37-S40. (PMID: 29284933)
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986 Sep;90(3):243-9. (PMID: 3092637)
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Jun;47S:A3-A9. (PMID: 31146848)
J Dent Assoc Thai. 1990 Jul-Aug;40(4):177-84. (PMID: 2074330)
J Invest Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):445-51. (PMID: 20001815)
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jun;8(6):ZC39-41. (PMID: 25121062)
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1988 Apr;11(2):94-7. (PMID: 3290376)
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2002 Jan;41(1):10-2. (PMID: 11860252)
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 May-Jun;5(3):232-6. (PMID: 26236684)
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003 Dec 19;52(RR-17):1-61. (PMID: 14685139)
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010 Jan-Mar;28(1):2-5. (PMID: 20215664)
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010 Nov;49(6):832-7. (PMID: 21205449)
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2008 Apr;25(2):36-9, 75. (PMID: 18780544)
Ugeskr Laeger. 2001 Feb 26;163(9):1295-6. (PMID: 11258258)
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Dec;5(6):108-12. (PMID: 24453454)
المشرفين على المادة: 3K9958V90M (Ethanol)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20220322 Date Completed: 20220525 Latest Revision: 20221102
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC9137293
DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000053
PMID: 35314021
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2769-6677
DOI:10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000053