دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Comparison of the CollaboRATE and SDM-Q-9 questionnaires to appreciate the patient-reported level of shared decision-making.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of the CollaboRATE and SDM-Q-9 questionnaires to appreciate the patient-reported level of shared decision-making.
المؤلفون: Ubbink DT; Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.ubbink@amsterdamumc.nl., van Asbeck EV; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Aarts JWM; Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Stubenrouch FE; Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Location East, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Geerts PAF; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Haematology and School GROW, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands., Atsma F; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Meinders MJ; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
المصدر: Patient education and counseling [Patient Educ Couns] 2022 Jul; Vol. 105 (7), pp. 2475-2479. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 10.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Elsevier Country of Publication: Ireland NLM ID: 8406280 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-5134 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 07383991 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Patient Educ Couns
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Limerick : Elsevier
Original Publication: Princeton, N.J. : Excerpta Medica, c1983-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Decision Making, Shared* , Patient Participation*, Aminoacridines ; Decision Making ; Humans ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Surveys and Questionnaires
مستخلص: Objective: To compare CollaboRATE and SDM-Q-9 questionnaires when appreciating patient-perceived level of shared decision-making (SDM) in doctor-patient consultations.
Methods: Data were harvested from five separate studies on SDM, conducted in three university and one large community hospital in the Netherlands, using Dutch versions of both questionnaires. CollaboRATE and SDM-Q-9 scores were expressed as percentages. Correlation was assessed using Spearman's Rho coefficient. Bland&Altman analysis was used to assess the degree of agreement. Top scores were calculated to assess possible ceiling effects.
Results: The five studies included 442 patients. Median CollaboRATE scores (88.9%, IQR 81.5-100%) were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than SDM-Q-9 scores (80.0%, IQR 64.4-100%). Correlation was moderate (Rho=0.53, p < 0.001). A systematic, 12.5-point higher score was found across the range of scores when using CollaboRATE. Top scores for CollaboRATE and SDM-Q-9 were present in 37.5% and 17% of questionnaires, respectively.
Conclusions: Overall, CollaboRATE and SDM-Q-9 questionnaires showed a high level of patient-perceived SDM. However, CollaboRATE only moderately correlated with SDM-Q-9 and had a stronger ceiling effect.
Practice Implications: When choosing a SDM-measurement tool, its benefits and limitations should be weighed. These metrics should be combined with objective scores of SDM, as these may differ from the patients' subjective interpretation.
(Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Questionnaires: CollaboRATE: SDM-Q-9: psychometrics: comparison; Shared decision-making
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Aminoacridines)
50815-81-1 (SDM)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20220325 Date Completed: 20220616 Latest Revision: 20220803
رمز التحديث: 20221213
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.007
PMID: 35331573
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1873-5134
DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.007