دورية أكاديمية
Digital divide among individuals with acquired brain injury: a scoping review protocol.
| العنوان: | Digital divide among individuals with acquired brain injury: a scoping review protocol. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Chuah SL; Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW Australia., Whiting DL; Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW Australia.; School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia., Simpson GK; Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW Australia.; John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. |
| المصدر: | JBI evidence synthesis [JBI Evid Synth] 2022 Dec 01; Vol. 20 (12), pp. 3009-3016. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 01. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101764819 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2689-8381 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 26898381 NLM ISO Abbreviation: JBI Evid Synth Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: [Philadelphia, PA] : Wolters Kluwer, [2020]- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Digital Divide* , Brain Injuries* , Brain Injuries, Traumatic*, Humans ; Information Technology ; Communication ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Review Literature as Topic |
| مستخلص: | Objective: This scoping review will identify literature pertaining to individuals with an acquired brain injury and digital divide; specifically, examining personal access and use of internet-enabled information and communication technologies. The review will identify the information and communication technologies used by individuals with an acquired brain injury as well as the determinants of technology use. The review will also identify and create a taxonomy of information and communication technologies utilized in relation to cognitive and psychosocial outcomes for individuals with an acquired brain injury in community and outpatient settings. Introduction: Internet-enabled technologies are increasingly central to all aspects of living, including health care and community participation; however, gaps in the access to and use of information and communication technologies among individuals with an acquired brain injury may limit the utility of a digitalized society. Inclusion Criteria: Studies that focus on access to or use of internet-enabled information and communication technologies among individuals with an acquired brain injury (including stroke, infection, tumor, disease, hypoxia, or traumatic brain injury) will be considered in this review. Methods: Primary peer-reviewed studies published in English from 2001 onward will be considered for inclusion. Six electronic databases will be searched: Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and APA PsycINFO. Gray literature searches for government and nongovernment organization reports and data, and dissertation theses will be conducted via advanced Google searches. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full texts of articles based on the "population, concept, context" inclusion criteria. Relevant data will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2022 JBI.) |
| References: | Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung Y-C, Punchak M, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2019;130(4):1080–1097. Ponsford JL, Downing M, Olver J, Ponsford M, Acher R, Carty M, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma 2014;31(1):64–77. Simpson GK, McRae P, Hallab L, Daher M, Strettles B. Participation in competitive employment after severe traumatic brain injury: new employment versus return to previous (pre-injury) employment. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020;30(6):995–1012. Tate RL, Lane-Brown AT, Myles BM, Cameron ID. A longitudinal study of support needs after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2020;34(8):991–1000. Bender A, Adrion C, Fischer L, Huber M, Jawny K, Straube A, et al. Long-term rehabilitation in patients with acquired brain injury. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016;113(38):634–641. Charters E, Gillett L, Simpson GK. Efficacy of electronic portable assistive devices for people with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2015;25(1):82–121. Juengst SB, Hart T, Sander AM, Nalder E, Pappadis M. Mobile health interventions for traumatic brain injuries. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 2019;7:341–356. Nam J-H, Kim H. How assistive devices affect activities of daily living and cognitive functions of people with brain injury: a meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2018;13(3):305–311. Shaw T, McGregor D, Brunner M, Keep M, Janssen A, Barnet S. What is eHealth? Development of a conceptual model for eHealth: qualitative study with key informants. J Med Internet Res 2017;19(10):e324. Racherla P, Mandviwalla M. Moving from access to use of the information infrastructure: a multilevel sociotechnical framework. Inf Syst Res 2013;24(3):709–730. Yu B, Ndumu A, Liu J, Fan Z. E-inclusion or digital divide: an integrated model of digital inequality. J Doc 2018;74(3):552–574. Vassilakopoulou P, Hustad E. Bridging digital divides: a literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Inf Syst Front 2021;1–15. Duplaga M. Digital divide among people with disabilities: analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of internet use and activities performed online. PLoS One 2017;12(6):e0179825. Pethig F, Krönung J. Specialized information systems for the digitally disadvantaged. J Assoc Inf Syst 2019; 1412–1446. Goverover Y, DeLuca J. Actual reality: using the internet to assess everyday functioning after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2015;29(6):715–721. Jones M, Morris J, Deruyter F. Mobile healthcare and people with disabilities: current state and future needs. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15(3):515. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Household use of information technology, Australia; 2016-17 Statistics. Cat. No. 8146. [internet]. ABS Website; 2018 [cited 2021 Oct 31]. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/technology-and-innovation/household-use-information-technology/2016-17 . Baker-Sparr C, Hart T, Bergquist T, Bogner J, Dreer L, Juengst S, et al. Internet and social media use after traumatic brain injury: a traumatic brain injury model systems study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2018;33(1):E9–E17. Vaccaro M, Hart T, Whyte J, Buchhofer R. Internet use and interest among individuals with traumatic brain injury: a consumer survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2(2):85–95. Rietdijk R, Power E, Attard M, Heard R, Togher L. Improved conversation outcomes after social communication skills training for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: a clinical trial investigating in-person and telehealth delivery. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2020;63(2):615–632. Juengst SB, Terhorst L, Nabasny A, Wallace T, Weaver JA, Osborne CL, et al. Use of mHealth technology for patient-reported outcomes in community-dwelling adults with acquired brain injuries: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(4):. Lawson DW, Stolwyk RJ, Ponsford JL, McKenzie DP, Downing MG, Wong D. Telehealth delivery of memory rehabilitation following stroke. Int Neuropsychol Soc 2020;26(1):58–71. Chun HY, Carson AJ, Tsanas A, Dennis MS, Mead GE, Calabria C, et al. Telemedicine cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety after stroke: proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial. J Stroke 2020;51(8):2297–2306. Brandt Å, Jensen MP, Søberg MS, Andersen SD, Sund T. Information and communication technology-based assistive technology to compensate for impaired cognition in everyday life: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2020;15(7):810–824. Ketchum JM, Sevigny M, Hart T, O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, Sander AM, Juengst SB, et al. The association between community participation and social internet use among adults with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2020;35(4):254–261. Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H Aromataris E, Munn Z. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2020 [cited 2021 Nov 2]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global . Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13(3):141–146. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169(7):467–473. Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, Stern C, Porritt K, Farrow J, et al. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: The Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). Int J Evid Based Healthc 2019;17(1):36–43. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffman TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. Harst OL, Timpel P, Richter P, Lantzsch H, Wollschlaeger B, Winkler K, et al. An empirically sound telemedicine taxonomy – applying the CAFE methodology. J Public Health 2021. |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20220906 Date Completed: 20221215 Latest Revision: 20230105 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240628 |
| DOI: | 10.11124/JBIES-21-00423 |
| PMID: | 36065946 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
| تدمد: | 2689-8381 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.11124/JBIES-21-00423 |