دورية أكاديمية

Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).
المؤلفون: González ST; Department of Urology, Universidad Nacional de la Plata - UNLP, La Plata, Buenos Aires.; Department of Urology, Hospital Interzonal Especializado en Pediatría 'Sor María Ludovica', La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina., Rosito TE; Departamento de Urologia, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil., Tur AB; Department Pediatric Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain., Ruiz J; Department of Urology, Hospital Pediatric Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina., Gozalbez R; Division of Pediatric Urology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, United States., Maiolo A; Department of Urology, Hospital Interzonal Especializado en Pediatría 'Sor María Ludovica', La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina., Tavares PM; Departamento de Urologia, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil., Gorgen ARH; Departamento de Urologia, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil., de Kencht EL; Department Pediatric Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain., Madarriaga YQ; Department Pediatric Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain., Weller S; Department of Urology, Hospital Pediatric Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina., Tobia IP; Department of Urology, Universidad Nacional de la Plata - UNLP, La Plata, Buenos Aires., Castellan M; Division of Pediatric Urology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, United States., Corbetta JP; Department of Urology, Hospital Pediatric Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
المصدر: International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology [Int Braz J Urol] 2022 Nov-Dec; Vol. 48 (6), pp. 961-968.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Multicenter Study
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Brazilian Society of Urology Country of Publication: Brazil NLM ID: 101158091 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1677-6119 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 16775538 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int Braz J Urol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Rio de Janerio, RJ, Brazil : Brazilian Society of Urology, [2002]-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Laparoscopy*/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures*/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures*/methods , Ureteral Obstruction*/surgery, Child ; Child, Preschool ; Humans ; Infant ; Kidney/physiology ; Kidney Pelvis/surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods
مستخلص: Introduction: Dismembered open pyeloplasty described by Anderson and Hynes is the "gold standard" for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The aim of our study was to compare the results of open (OP) vs laparoscopic (LP) vs robotic (RALP) pyeloplasty.
Material and Methods: A multicenter prospective review was conducted of pyeloplasty surgeries performed at five high-volume centers between 2014 and 2018. Demographic data, history of prenatal hydronephrosis, access type, MAG3 renogram and differential renal function, surgery time, length of hospital stay, and complication rate (Clavien-Dindo) were recorded. Access type was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests.
Results: A total of 322 patients were included: 62 OP, 86 LP, and 174 RALP. The mean age was 8.13 (r: 1-16) years, with a statistically significant lower age (mean 5 years) in OP (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the distribution of the side affected. Operative time was 110.5 min for OP, 140 min for LP, and 179 min for RALP (p < 0.0001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RALP group than in the other groups (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in postoperative complications and reoperations between the three groups.
Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery for the management of UPJO in children is gaining more acceptance, even in patients younger than 1-year-old. Operative time continues to be significantly shorter in OP than in LP and RALP. Hospital stay was shorter in RALP compared to the other techniques. No differences were found in complication rates, type of complications, and reoperation rate.
Competing Interests: None declared.
(Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.)
التعليقات: Comment in: Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Nov-Dec;48(6):969-970. (PMID: 36173408)
References: J Pediatr Urol. 2009 Oct;5(5):368-73. (PMID: 19369118)
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Nov-Dec;47(6):1209-1218. (PMID: 34469674)
J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):306-11. (PMID: 19914659)
J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1440-2. (PMID: 16145459)
J Endourol. 2011 May;25(5):727-36. (PMID: 21476861)
Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):97-101. (PMID: 19057224)
J Urol. 1995 Jun;153(6):1962-5. (PMID: 7752371)
Br J Urol. 1949 Sep;21(3):209-14. (PMID: 18148283)
BJU Int. 2014 Oct;114(4):582-94. (PMID: 25383399)
JSLS. 2005 Jul-Sep;9(3):252-7. (PMID: 16121866)
ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Jun 20;6:2581-8. (PMID: 17619734)
Surg Endosc. 2009 Mar;23(3):544-9. (PMID: 18389318)
BJU Int. 2001 Mar;87(4):287-9. (PMID: 11251517)
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):2137-41; discussion 2141. (PMID: 17870122)
Urology. 2006 Mar;67(3):599-602. (PMID: 16504272)
Front Pediatr. 2017 Feb 01;5:10. (PMID: 28203561)
Br J Urol. 1996 Jun;77(6):909-13. (PMID: 8705232)
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. (PMID: 15273542)
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008 Jan;5(1):59-64. (PMID: 18095897)
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Dec;10(6):982-98. (PMID: 25435247)
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Mar-Apr;46(2):253-259. (PMID: 32022515)
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Aug;15(4):421-422. (PMID: 31431350)
Eur Urol. 2002 Nov;42(5):453-7; discussion 457-8. (PMID: 12429153)
J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4 Suppl):1663-7. (PMID: 21862079)
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4 Suppl):1689-92; discussion 1692. (PMID: 18708209)
J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):683-7; discussion 687. (PMID: 16407025)
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):322-327. (PMID: 31961623)
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Apr;10(2):380-5. (PMID: 24268880)
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Apr 15;8(4):4922-31. (PMID: 26131065)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Laparoscopy; Robotics; Ureteral Obstruction
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20220909 Date Completed: 20221003 Latest Revision: 20221217
رمز التحديث: 20221217
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC9747029
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0194
PMID: 36083265
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1677-6119
DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0194