دورية أكاديمية
Support and guide performance comparison of balloon guide catheters.
| العنوان: | Support and guide performance comparison of balloon guide catheters. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Matsumoto T; Department of Neurosurgery, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan., Takeuchi M; Department of Neurosurgery, Seisho Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan., Uyama A; Department of Neurosurgery, Seisho Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan., Konishi Y; Department of Neurosurgery, Seisho Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan., Iwabuchi S; Department of Neurosurgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan. |
| المصدر: | Surgical neurology international [Surg Neurol Int] 2022 Oct 28; Vol. 13, pp. 490. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Oct 28 (Print Publication: 2022). |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Scientific Scholar LLC Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101535836 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2229-5097 (Print) Linking ISSN: 21527806 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Surg Neurol Int Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: Pittsford, NY, USA : Scientific Scholar LLC Original Publication: Mumbai : Medknow |
| مستخلص: | Background: Several types of balloon guide catheters (BGCs) are used in mechanical thrombus retrieval. However, direct comparisons of their supporting and guiding performance have not been reported. We compared the supporting and guiding performance of the Branchor, Flowgate, and Optimo BGCs using a type 3 aorta artificial vascular model. Methods: An inner catheter was pushed into the artificial vascular model using a linear actuator for the supporting performance evaluation. A previously placed BGC in the internal carotid artery was then intentionally caused to slip. Supporting performance was evaluated by measuring the distance the BGC slipped and generated maximum resistance during Inner catheter insertion. For the guiding performance experiment, a linear actuator was used to guide the BGC into the internal carotid artery of the artificial vessel model. The guiding performance was evaluated by measuring the distance reached by the BGC, maximum resistance generated during insertion of the guiding catheter, and distance the inner catheter slipped. Each experiment was replicated 5 times. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the results of the five supporting performance experiments. However, the results of the first and second experiments suggested that the Optimo offers better supporting performance. In the guiding performance experiment, significant differences were observed, suggesting that the Branchor and Flowgate have superior guiding performance in comparison with the Optimo. Conclusion: The Optimo offered superior supporting performance, while the Branchor and Flowgate showed better guiding performance than the Optimo. Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest. (Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International.) |
| References: | N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2285-95. (PMID: 25882376) JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1279-88. (PMID: 27673305) N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):11-20. (PMID: 25517348) N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30. (PMID: 25671798) N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18. (PMID: 25671797) J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Feb;8(2):197-202. (PMID: 25540180) J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Apr;10(4):335-339. (PMID: 28754806) J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Aug;12(8):763-767. (PMID: 32015181) N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306. (PMID: 25882510) Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31. (PMID: 26898852) AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Sep;27(8):1710-1. (PMID: 16971619) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Balloon guide catheter; Mechanical thrombectomy; Performance |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20221130 Latest Revision: 20221202 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240628 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC9699835 |
| DOI: | 10.25259/SNI_749_2022 |
| PMID: | 36447862 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
| تدمد: | 2229-5097 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.25259/SNI_749_2022 |