دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals: A systematic review using the COSMIN checklist.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals: A systematic review using the COSMIN checklist.
المؤلفون: Tomacheuski RM; Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical School (FMB) of São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil., Monteiro BP; Département de sciences cliniques, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada., Evangelista MC; Département de sciences cliniques, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada., Luna SPL; Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil., Steagall PV; Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical School (FMB) of São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.; Département de sciences cliniques, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada.; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences and Centre for Companion Animal Health and Welfare, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
المصدر: PloS one [PLoS One] 2023 Jan 20; Vol. 18 (1), pp. e0280830. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 20 (Print Publication: 2023).
نوع المنشور: Systematic Review; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Checklist* , Animals, Domestic*, Animals ; Sheep ; Cattle ; Swine ; Reproducibility of Results ; Farms ; Pain/diagnosis ; Pain/veterinary ; Psychometrics
مستخلص: This systematic review aimed to investigate the measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals. According to the PRISMA guidelines, a registered report protocol was previously published in this journal. Studies reporting the development and validation of acute and chronic pain scoring instruments based on behavioral and/or facial expressions of farm animals were searched. Data extraction and assessment were performed individually by two investigators using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Nine categories were assessed: two for scale development (general design requirements and development, and content validity and comprehensibility) and seven for measurement properties (internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, criterion and construct validity, responsiveness and cross-cultural validity). The overall strength of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) of each instrument was scored based on methodological quality, number of studies and studies' findings. Twenty instruments for three species (bovine, ovine and swine) were included. There was considerable variability concerning their development and measurement properties. Three behavior-based instruments scored high for strength of evidence: UCAPS (Unesp-Botucatu Unidimensional Composite Pain Scale for assessing postoperative pain in cattle), USAPS (Unesp-Botucatu Sheep Acute Composite Pain Scale) and UPAPS (Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale). Four instruments scored moderate for strength of evidence: MPSS (Multidimensional Pain Scoring System for bovine), SPFES (Sheep Pain Facial Expression Scale), LGS (Lamb Grimace Scale) and PGS-B (Piglet Grimace Scale-B). Most instruments (n = 13) scored low or very low for final overall evidence. Construct validity was the most reported measurement property followed by criterion validity and reliability. Instruments with reported validation are urgently required for pain assessment of buffalos, goats, camelids and avian species.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2023 Tomacheuski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
التعليقات: Update of: PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251435. (PMID: 33989321)
References: Front Vet Sci. 2016 Nov 14;3:100. (PMID: 27896270)
J Anim Sci. 1997 Jan;75(1):266-72. (PMID: 9027575)
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Sep 06;10:200. (PMID: 25192598)
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 28;10(7):e0134024. (PMID: 26217942)
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 14;10(11):. (PMID: 33202526)
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2005;8(4):261-78. (PMID: 16436030)
Vet J. 2007 Sep;174(2):227-39. (PMID: 17553712)
PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251435. (PMID: 33989321)
J Pers Assess. 2003 Feb;80(1):99-103. (PMID: 12584072)
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 19;12(4):e0175839. (PMID: 28422994)
Pain Ther. 2013 Dec;2(2):75-86. (PMID: 25135146)
Pain. 1989 Dec;39(3):353-357. (PMID: 2616185)
Animal. 2019 Sep;13(9):2034-2043. (PMID: 30808432)
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0239622. (PMID: 33052903)
Pain. 2022 Jun 1;163(6):e697-e714. (PMID: 34510132)
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49. (PMID: 20169472)
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Oct 23;14(1):318. (PMID: 30352586)
Acta Vet Scand. 2017 Jun 14;59(1):40. (PMID: 28615028)
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Apr;10(4):283-94. (PMID: 19259101)
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 13;9(1):19128. (PMID: 31836868)
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Nov 26;5:299. (PMID: 30534552)
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Apr 18;4:51. (PMID: 28459052)
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. (PMID: 18839484)
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1998 Jan 1;212(1):61-6. (PMID: 9426779)
Animal. 2013 Jun;7(6):998-1010. (PMID: 23254122)
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;52(2):121-8. (PMID: 17375868)
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Oct;46 Pt 4:604-27. (PMID: 25236781)
Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):651-7. (PMID: 21732199)
Vet Rec. 2017 Oct 14;181(15):400. (PMID: 28814534)
Res Vet Sci. 2019 Oct;126:155-163. (PMID: 31494378)
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):121-4. (PMID: 18424804)
Vet Ital. 2018 Mar 31;54(1):49-61. (PMID: 29631315)
Am J Vet Res. 2011 Feb;72(2):174-83. (PMID: 21281191)
Global Spine J. 2019 Apr;9(2):231-242. (PMID: 30984504)
Vet Anim Sci. 2016 Dec 01;1-2:36-39. (PMID: 32734022)
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 1;15(6):e0233552. (PMID: 32480399)
Am J Vet Res. 1993 Jun;54(6):976-83. (PMID: 8323070)
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Sep 12;5:215. (PMID: 30258846)
BMC Vet Res. 2013 Jul 17;9:143. (PMID: 23867090)
Aust Vet J. 2002 Apr;80(4):228-33. (PMID: 12054287)
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Sep;85(9):2250-6. (PMID: 12362457)
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017 Sep;44(5):1253-1261. (PMID: 28986129)
Behav Processes. 2016 Nov;132:49-56. (PMID: 27693533)
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 10;6:495. (PMID: 31998770)
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Aug;91(8):3010-4. (PMID: 18650277)
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):293. (PMID: 33267819)
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. (PMID: 29260445)
J Invest Surg. 2019 Dec;32(8):706-715. (PMID: 29641275)
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 02;10(3):. (PMID: 32131424)
J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(4):2118-34. (PMID: 24534501)
J Dairy Sci. 2010 May;93(5):2007-13. (PMID: 20412914)
Can Vet J. 2007 Nov;48(11):1129-36. (PMID: 18050793)
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. (PMID: 29435801)
Vet J. 2003 Mar;165(2):131-5. (PMID: 12573601)
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2013 Jul;40(4):410-8. (PMID: 23461405)
Pain. 1994 Feb;56(2):217-226. (PMID: 8008411)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230120 Date Completed: 20230124 Latest Revision: 20231118
رمز التحديث: 20240628
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC9858734
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280830
PMID: 36662813
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0280830