دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

The Well-being of Brazilian Industry Workers on Returning to the Physical Workplace During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Well-being of Brazilian Industry Workers on Returning to the Physical Workplace During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
المؤلفون: Santana GL; From the Section of Psychiatric Epidemiology-Medical Research Laboratory 23 (LIM 23), Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (G.L.S., M.C.B., and L.H.A.); Industrial Social Service (SESI), Brazilian National Confederation of Industry (CNI), Brasilia, Brazil (G.A.G.d.M.); and São Paulo School of Business Administration, Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, Brazil (A.J.N.O. and A.M.M.)., Baptista MC, Gomes de Matos GA, Ogata AJN, Malik AM, Andrade LH
المصدر: Journal of occupational and environmental medicine [J Occup Environ Med] 2023 Apr 01; Vol. 65 (4), pp. e246-e254. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 18.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9504688 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1536-5948 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10762752 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Occup Environ Med Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: Baltimore, MD : Williams & Wilkins, c1995-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: COVID-19*/epidemiology, Humans ; Female ; Male ; Pandemics ; Brazil/epidemiology ; Workplace/psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires
مستخلص: Objective: Our aim was to assess the prevalence and predictors of well-being among Brazilian industry workers on returning to the physical workplace during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Two thousand two hundred forty-one participants completed an online survey between October and November 2021. Well-being was assessed with the World Health Organization Well-being Index, and the questionnaire also addressed sociodemographic and occupational characteristics and the health of workers and their contacts. Associations were estimated with logistic regression models.
Results: The prevalence of adequate well-being was 63.15%. The predictors of poor well-being included being female, younger, working exclusively from home or on a hybrid model, having comorbid disorders, and living with someone with any comorbidity.
Conclusions: The identification of vulnerable groups with poor well-being may help organizations to direct efforts to the unmet psychological needs of these employees and develop well-being programs during this transition.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: None declared.
(Copyright © 2023 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.)
References: World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 [WHO Director-General's speeches]. 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 . Accessed August 28, 2022.
Worldometers.info. COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic [Worldometers]. 2022. Available at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ . Accessed July 31, 2022.
COVID 19 Excess Mortality Collaborators. Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19–related mortality, 2020–21. Lancet . 2022;399:1513–1536.
Talic S, Shah S, Wild H, et al. Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and COVID-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ . 2021;375:e068302.
Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet . 2020;395:912–920.
Roychowdhury D. 2019 Novel coronavirus disease, crisis, and isolation. Front Psychol . 2020;11:1958.
Pappas G, Kiriaze IJ, Giannakis P, Falagas ME. Psychosocial consequences of infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Infect . 2009;15:743–747.
The Lancet Infectious Diseases. The COVID-19 infodemic. Lancet Infect Dis . 2020;20:875.
Banerjee D, Rai M. Social isolation in COVID-19: the impact of loneliness. Int J Soc Psychiatry . 2020;66:525–527.
Killgore WDS, Cloonan SA, Taylor EC, Dailey NS. Loneliness: a signature mental health concern in the era of COVID-19. Psychiatry Res . 2020;290:113117.
Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med . 2020;383:510–512.
Quadros S, Garg S, Ranjan R, Vijayasarathi G, Mamun MA. Fear of COVID 19 infection across different cohorts: a scoping review. Front Psych . 2021;12:708430.
Howard LM, Wilson CA, Chandra PS. Intimate partner violence and mental health: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. World Psychiatry . 2022;21:311–313.
Xue J, Chen J, Chen C, Hu R, Zhu T. The hidden pandemic of family violence during COVID-19: unsupervised Learning of tweets. J Med Internet Res . 2020;22:e24361.
Carvalho AR, Souza LR, Goncalves SL, Almeida ERF. Social vulnerability and health crisis in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica . 2021;37:e00071721.
Ahmed MZ, Ahmed O, Aibao Z, Hanbin S, Siyu L, Ahmad A. Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated psychological problems. Asian J Psychiatr . 2020;51:102092.
Lades LK, Laffan K, Daly M, Delaney L. Daily emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Health Psychol . 2020;25:902–911.
Colucci E, Nadeau S, Higgins J, et al. COVID-19 lockdowns' effects on the quality of life, perceived health and well-being of healthy elderly individuals: a longitudinal comparison of pre-lockdown and lockdown states of well-being. Arch Gerontol Geriatr . 2022;99:104606.
Inauen J, Zhou G. Health and well-being in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from applied psychology. Appl Psychol Health Well Being . 2020;12:937–945.
Diaz Hernandez L, Giezendanner S, Fischer R, Zeller A. The effect of COVID-19 on mental well-being in Switzerland: a cross-sectional survey of the adult Swiss general population. BMC Fam Pract . 2021;22:181.
Duarte MQ, Santo MAS, Lima CP, Giordani JP, Trentini CM. COVID-19 e os impactos na saúde mental: Uma amostra do Rio Grande do Sul. Cien Saude Colet [Periódico na Internet] . 2020;25:3401–3411. Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Accessed September 2, 2022.
Souza ASR, Souza GFA, Souza GA, et al. Factors associated with stress, anxiety, and depression during social distancing in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica . 2021;55:5.
Goularte JF, Serafim SD, Colombo R, Hogg B, Caldieraro MA, Rosa AR. COVID-19 and mental health in Brazil: psychiatric symptoms in the general population. J Psychiatr Res . 2021;132:32–37.
Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review. J Affect Disord . 2020;277:55–64.
COVID-19 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 2021:1700–1712.
Daly M, Sutin AR, Robinson E. Longitudinal changes in mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the UK household longitudinal study. Psychol Med . 2020;52:2549–2558.
Robinson E, Sutin AR, Daly M, Jones A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. J Affect Disord . 2022;296:567–576.
Niedzwiedz CL, Green MJ, Benzeval M, et al. Mental health and health behaviours before and during the initial phase of the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analyses of the UK household longitudinal study. J Epidemiol Community Health . 2021;75:224–231.
Benatov J, Ochnik D, Rogowska AM, Arzensek A, Mars Bitenc U. Prevalence and sociodemographic predictors of mental health in a representative sample of young adults from Germany, Israel, Poland, and Slovenia: a longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2022;19:1334.
Racine N, McArthur BA, Cooke JE, Eirich R, Zhu J, Madigan S. Global prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents during COVID-19: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr . 2021;175:1142–1150.
Graupensperger S, Calhoun BH, Patrick ME, Lee CM. Longitudinal effects of COVID-19–related stressors on young adults' mental health and wellbeing. Appl Psychol Health Well Being . 2022;14:734–756.
Cenat JM, Farahi S, Dalexis RD, et al. The global evolution of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Affect Disord . 2022;315:70–95.
Généreux M, Schluter PJ, Hung KK, et al. One virus, four continents, eight countries: an interdisciplinary and international study on the psychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic among adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2020;:17, 8390.
Da Silva AG, Pinheiro M, Tres LM, Malloy-Diniz LF. Working during pandemics: the need for mental health efforts to prevent the outbreak of mental disorders at the workplace. Braz J Psychiatry . 2020;43:116–117.
International Labour Organization. ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work . Geneva, Switzerland: ILO; 2020:23.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Teleworking in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trends and Prospects . Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2021. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/teleworking-in-the-covid-19-pandemic-trends-and-prospects-72a416b6/ . Accessed September 10, 2022.
de Souza WM, Buss LF, Candido DDS, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil. Nat Hum Behav . 2020;4:856–865.
Neiva MB, Carvalho I, Costa-Filho ES, et al. Brazil: the emerging epicenter of COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop . 2020;53:e20200550.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios—PNAD COVID19. In: Resultado Mensal—Novembro/2020 . Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IBGE; 2020.
Salum F, Coleta K, Drummond V. Novas formas de trabalhar: as adequações ao home office em tempos de crise - 2a edição. Fundação Dom Cabral; Grant Thornton Brasil; Emlyon Business School; 2021. 27 p. Available at: https://www.grantthornton.com.br/insights/artigos-e-publicacoes/pesquisa-adequacoes-ao-home-office/ . Accessed September 10, 2022.
Giovanis E, Ozdamar O. Implications of COVID-19: the effect of working from home on financial and mental well-being in the UK. Int J Health Policy Manag . 2021;11:1635–1641.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Pesquisa Industrial Anual—Empresa 2020 . Brasília, Brazil: IBGE; 2022. Available at: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/1719/pia_2020_v39_n1_empresa_informativo.pdf . Accessed August 25, 2022.
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). Industrial Development Report 2022—The Future of Industrialization in a Post-Pandemic World . Vienna, Austria: UNIDO; 2021.
Shin D, Konrad AM. Causality between high-performance work systems and organizational performance. J Manage . 2017;43:973–997.
Turban DB, Yan W. Relationship of eudaimonia and hedonia with work outcomes. J Manag Psychol . 2016;31:1006–1020.
Salgado JF, Blanco S, Moscoso S. Subjective well-being and job performance: testing of a suppressor effect. Rev Psicol Trab Organ . 2019;35:93–102.
Wright TA, Cropanzano R, Bonett DG. The moderating role of employee positive well being on the relation between job satisfaction and job performance. J Occup Health Psychol . 2007;12:93–104.
Kundi YM, Aboramadan M, Elhamalawi EMI, Shahid S. Employee psychological well-being and job performance: exploring mediating and moderating mechanisms. Int J Organ Anal . 2021;29:736–754.
Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL. Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull . 1999;125:276–302.
Bech P. Measuring the dimension of psychological general well-being by the WHO-5. QoL Newslett . 2004;15–16.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, Revision 4 . New York: United Nations; 2008.
Qualtrics. Qualtrics Software Version 10, 11/2021 . Provo, UT. Available at: https://www.qualtrics.com . Accessed November 30, 2021.
Ritchie H, Mathieu E, Rodés-Guirao L, et al. Our World in Data . Brazil: Coronavirus Pandemic Country Profile; 2020. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus/country/brazil . Accessed September 8, 2022.
World Health Organization. The WHO-5 Web site. Available at: https://www.psykiatri-regionh.dk/who-5/Pages/default.aspx . Accessed August 8, 2021.
Topp CW, Ostergaard SD, Sondergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 Well-being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom . 2015;84:167–176.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Assessing the fit of the model. In: Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX, eds. Applied Logistic Regression . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2013:153–225.
StataCorp LLC. Pearson or Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. In: Stata Base Reference Manual Release 17 . College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2021:595–604.
StataCorp LLC. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17 . College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2019.
Wolter KM. Introduction to Variance Estimation . New York: Springer-Verlag; 1985.
Ogata AJN, Malik AM, Lourenco V, Savia V, Pinto AC, Rodrigues Y. Impact on health and well-being of working at home during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Rev Bras Med Trab . 2022;20:79–85.
Roldán-Merino J, Hurtado-Pardos B, Molina-Raya L, Bande D, Casas I, Farres-Tarafa M. Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nursing students in the first wave: a cross-sectional survey. Nurs Open . 2022;9:2003–2012.
Tsai FY, Schillok H, Coenen M, Merkel C, Jung-Sievers C; on behalf of the Cosmo Study Group. The well-being of the German adult population measured with the WHO-5 over different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis within the COVID-19 snapshot monitoring study (COSMO). Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2022;19.
Ariza-Montes A, Mahmood F, Han H, Saleem M. The mental well-being of health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Occup Environ Med . 2022;64:429–442.
Gilan D, Rothke N, Blessin M, et al. Psychomorbidity, resilience, and exacerbating and protective factors during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Dtsch Arztebl Int . 2020;117:625–630.
Wang Y, Kala MP, Jafar TH. Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One . 2020;15:e0244630.
World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders global health estimates. 2017. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254610/WHO-MSD-MER-2017.2-eng.pdf?sequence=1 . Accessed October 4, 2022.
Gaspar T, Paiva T, Matos MG. Impact of COVID-19 in global health and psychosocial risks at work. J Occup Environ Med . 2021;63:581–587.
Xiao Y, Becerik-Gerber B, Lucas G, Roll SC. Impacts of working from home during COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental well-being of office workstation users. J Occup Environ Med . 2021;63:181–190.
Feng Y, Gu W, Dong F, Dong D, Qiao Z. Overexposure to COVID-19 information amplifies emotional distress: a latent moderated mediation model. Transl Psychiatry . 2022;12:287.
Modarresi S, Seens H, Hussain U, Fraser J, Boudreau J, MacDermid J. What are the mental health changes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in people with medical conditions? An international survey. BMJ Open . 2022;12:e060995.
Yang S, Kwak SG, Chang MC. Psychological impact of COVID-19 on hospital workers in nursing care hospitals. Nurs Open . 2021;8:284–289.
Peters SE, Dennerlein JT, Wagner GR, Sorensen G. Work and worker health in the post-pandemic world: a public health perspective. Lancet Public Health . 2022;7:e188–e194.
Hamouche S. COVID-19 and employees' mental health: stressors, moderators and agenda for organizational actions. Emerald Open Res . 2020;2:15.
Jeong W, Kim YK, Oh SS, Yoon JH, Park EC. Association between presenteeism/absenteeism and well-being among Korean workers. J Occup Environ Med . 2020;62:574–580.
Leung CMC, Ho MK, Bharwani AA, et al. Mental disorders following COVID-19 and other epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry . 2022;12:205.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Mental wellbeing at work - NICE guideline [NG212] . London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2022. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng212 . Accessed May 10, 2022.
Office of the US Surgeon General. The US Surgeon General's Framework for Workplace Mental Health & Well-being. Washington, DC: US Department of Health & Human Services; 2022:46.
Tronco Hernandez YA, Parente F, Faghy MA, Roscoe CMP, Maratos FA. Influence of the COVID-19 lockdown on the physical and psychosocial well-being and work productivity of remote workers: cross-sectional correlational study. JMIRx Med . 2021;2:e30708.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230202 Date Completed: 20230411 Latest Revision: 20230818
رمز التحديث: 20230819
DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002797
PMID: 36728099
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1536-5948
DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002797