دورية أكاديمية
Effects of dietary Clostridium butyricum and fructooligosaccharides, alone or in combination, on performance, egg quality, amino acid digestibility, jejunal morphology, immune function, and antioxidant capacity of laying hens.
| العنوان: | Effects of dietary Clostridium butyricum and fructooligosaccharides, alone or in combination, on performance, egg quality, amino acid digestibility, jejunal morphology, immune function, and antioxidant capacity of laying hens. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Obianwuna UE; Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Animal Products on Feed Hazards (Beijing) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China., Qiu K; Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Animal Products on Feed Hazards (Beijing) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China., Wang J; Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Animal Products on Feed Hazards (Beijing) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China., Zhang HJ; Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Animal Products on Feed Hazards (Beijing) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China., Qi GH; Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Animal Products on Feed Hazards (Beijing) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China., Huang LL; Wilmar (Shanghai) Biotechnology Research & Development Center Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China., Wu SG; Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Animal Products on Feed Hazards (Beijing) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. |
| المصدر: | Frontiers in microbiology [Front Microbiol] 2023 Feb 22; Vol. 14, pp. 1125897. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Feb 22 (Print Publication: 2023). |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101548977 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1664-302X (Print) Linking ISSN: 1664302X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Front Microbiol Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Lausanne : Frontiers Research Foundation |
| مستخلص: | The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of Clostridium butyricum (CB) and fructooligosaccharide (FOS) singly or combined, on performance, egg quality, amino acid digestibility, jejunal morphology, immune function and antioxidant capacity in peak-phase laying hens. A total of 288 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30 weeks of age) were randomly assigned to 4 dietary groups that included basal diet, basal diet +0.02% of CB (zlc-17: 1 × 10 9 CFU/g) (PRO), basal diet +0.6% FOS (PRE), and basal diet +0.02% CB + 0.6% FOS (SYN) for 12 weeks. Each treatment had 6 replicates with 12 birds each. The results demonstrated that probiotics (PRO), prebiotics (PRE) and synbiotics (SYN) ( p ≤ 0.05), respectively, exerted a positive effect on the performance and physiological response of the birds. There were significant increases in egg production rate, egg weight, egg mass, daily feed intake and reduced number of damaged eggs. and zero mortality rate due to dietary PRO, PRE and SYN ( p ≤ 0.05) respectively. Also, feed conversion was improved by PRO ( p ≤ 0.05). In addition, egg quality assessment showed that; eggshell quality was increased by PRO ( p ≤ 0.05) and albumen indices (Haugh unit, thick albumen content, and albumen height) were enhanced by PRO, PRE and SYN ( p ≤ 0.05). Further analysis showed that PRO, PRE and SYN ( p ≤ 0.05), reduced heterophil to lymphocyte ratio, increased antioxidant enzymes and immunoglobulin concentration. Although spleen index was higher for PRO ( p ≤ 0.05) group. The significant increase in villi height, villi width, villi height to crypt depth ratio and reduced crypt depth were obvious for PRO, PRE, and SYN ( p ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, improved nutrient absorption and retention evidenced by increased digestibility of crude protein and amino acids, were notable for PRO, PRE, and SYN ( p ≤ 0.05) group. Collectively, our findings revealed that dietary CB and FOS alone, or combined, enhanced productive performance, egg quality, amino acid digestibility, jejunal morphology, and physiological response in peak-phase laying hens. Our results would provide direction on nutritional strategies for gut enhancers and better physiological response of peak laying hens. Competing Interests: L-lH was employed by Wilmar (Shanghai) Biotechnology Research & Development Centre Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2023 Obianwuna, Qiu, Wang, Zhang, Qi, Huang and Wu.) |
| References: | Br Poult Sci. 2008 Sep;49(5):550-9. (PMID: 18836901) Front Microbiol. 2021 Sep 16;12:657542. (PMID: 34603221) Cells. 2021 Jul 14;10(7):. (PMID: 34359944) PLoS One. 2017 Aug 15;12(8):e0182886. (PMID: 28813468) Microorganisms. 2019 May 06;7(5):. (PMID: 31064055) Poult Sci. 2020 Jan;99(1):471-478. (PMID: 32416832) Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013 Apr;45(4):1017-24. (PMID: 23271415) PLoS One. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0212079. (PMID: 31194771) Poult Sci. 2017 Dec 1;96(12):4208-4216. (PMID: 29053828) Nutr Res. 2016 Jul;36(7):648-57. (PMID: 27333955) Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4465-4479. (PMID: 31180128) Front Vet Sci. 2019 Mar 29;6:95. (PMID: 30984773) Poult Sci. 2021 Dec;100(12):101465. (PMID: 34634711) Transl Anim Sci. 2021 Jun 30;5(3):txab096. (PMID: 34316539) Front Microbiol. 2018 Sep 19;9:2191. (PMID: 30283419) Adv Nutr. 2018 Jan 1;9(1):21-29. (PMID: 29438462) Br J Nutr. 2016 Dec;116(11):1878-1888. (PMID: 27989252) Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4722-4728. (PMID: 31065703) J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Jan 30;94(2):341-8. (PMID: 24037967) Poult Sci. 2003 Jun;82(6):1030-6. (PMID: 12817461) Front Nutr. 2022 Apr 27;9:868093. (PMID: 35571886) Poult Sci. 2007 Jun;86(6):1161-5. (PMID: 17495087) Gut Pathog. 2018 Jun 6;10:21. (PMID: 29930711) Microorganisms. 2022 Mar 28;10(4):. (PMID: 35456777) Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021 Jan 3;53(1):63. (PMID: 33389265) Poult Sci. 2020 Nov;99(11):5344-5349. (PMID: 33142450) J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2016 Jan 26;7:3. (PMID: 26819705) Mol Med Rep. 2014 Nov;10(5):2255-62. (PMID: 25201602) Animals (Basel). 2019 Dec 10;9(12):. (PMID: 31835513) Poult Sci. 2008 Jul;87(7):1253-62. (PMID: 18577603) Poult Sci. 2015 Apr;94(4):662-7. (PMID: 25717087) Curr Microbiol. 2011 Feb;62(2):512-7. (PMID: 20711781) Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021 May;199(5):1986-1999. (PMID: 32666433) Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4449-4456. (PMID: 31162611) AMB Express. 2020 Aug 31;10(1):159. (PMID: 32869156) Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Nov 1;162:385-393. (PMID: 32569696) Anim Sci J. 2014 May;85(5):549-54. (PMID: 24428132) Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2016;67(2):83-91. (PMID: 26754553) Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2020 Mar;12(1):204-213. (PMID: 30810908) Arch Anim Nutr. 2007 Feb;61(1):42-9. (PMID: 17361947) Poult Sci. 2020 Apr;99(4):2275-2285. (PMID: 32241513) Poult Sci. 2018 Mar 1;97(3):874-881. (PMID: 29294100) Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 08;11(12):. (PMID: 34944274) Poult Sci. 2014 Jan;93(1):46-53. (PMID: 24570422) Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2010 Dec;293(12):2071-9. (PMID: 21046671) J Anim Sci. 2013 Nov;91(11):5287-93. (PMID: 24045474) Front Microbiol. 2021 Feb 22;12:635333. (PMID: 33692770) Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct;71(10):6150-8. (PMID: 16204533) Gut Microbes. 2017 Mar 4;8(2):172-184. (PMID: 28165863) J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2015 Feb;99(1):1-12. (PMID: 25041091) Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020 Apr;33(4):579-587. (PMID: 31480191) Poult Sci. 2019 Jan 1;98(1):150-163. (PMID: 30137622) Front Microbiol. 2022 Sep 13;13:987241. (PMID: 36177461) Poult Sci. 2010 Feb;89(2):254-60. (PMID: 20075277) Poult Sci. 2018 Jul 1;97(7):2525-2533. (PMID: 29669131) Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4408-4415. (PMID: 31065700) Poult Sci. 2020 Mar;99(3):1444-1453. (PMID: 32111315) Front Microbiol. 2019 Feb 11;10:57. (PMID: 30804896) Poult Sci. 2015 Jun;94(6):1411-8. (PMID: 25717086) Br Poult Sci. 2013;54(5):635-41. (PMID: 24112072) Poult Sci. 2018 Aug 1;97(8):2829-2835. (PMID: 29669038) Poult Sci. 2020 Apr;99(4):2100-2107. (PMID: 32241495) Poult Sci. 2012 Sep;91(9):2121-9. (PMID: 22912445) Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;11(11):. (PMID: 34827816) BMC Vet Res. 2017 Aug 17;13(1):248. (PMID: 28814309) Poult Sci. 2013 Sep;92(9):2389-95. (PMID: 23960122) Foods. 2022 Jun 21;11(13):. (PMID: 35804644) Poult Sci. 2019 Feb 1;98(2):896-903. (PMID: 30285187) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Clostridium butyricum; egg quality; fructooligosaccharides; laying performance; synbiotics |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20230313 Latest Revision: 20230314 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240628 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC9992415 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1125897 |
| PMID: | 36910205 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1664-302X |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1125897 |