دورية أكاديمية

Impact of Morbid Obesity on Post-esophagectomy Leak Rate: a NSQIP Analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Impact of Morbid Obesity on Post-esophagectomy Leak Rate: a NSQIP Analysis.
المؤلفون: Conroy MA; Division of GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L223A, Portland, OR, 97239, USA., O'Connor AL; Division of GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L223A, Portland, OR, 97239, USA., Qureshi AP; Division of GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L223A, Portland, OR, 97239, USA., Wood SG; Division of GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L223A, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. woodste@ohsu.edu.
المصدر: Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract [J Gastrointest Surg] 2023 Aug; Vol. 27 (8), pp. 1539-1544. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 20.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Elsevier B.V Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9706084 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-4626 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1091255X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Gastrointest Surg Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2024-: [Amsterdam] : Elsevier B.V.
Original Publication: St. Louis, MO : Quality Medical Pub., c1997-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Obesity, Morbid*/complications , Obesity, Morbid*/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms*/pathology , Hypertension*/complications, Humans ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology ; Anastomotic Leak/surgery ; Esophagectomy/adverse effects ; Quality Improvement ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Postoperative Complications/surgery
مستخلص: Background: Morbid obesity is becoming more prevalent and is a known risk factor for esophageal cancer. Esophagectomy in this population is technically more challenging than the non-obese, thus increasing the risks of surgery. This study hypothesizes that higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with higher anastomotic leak rates after esophagectomy.
Methods: This study is a retrospective review of patients undergoing esophagectomy in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Targeted Esophagectomy database from 2016 to 2019. Patients were stratified by BMI < 35 versus BMI > 35, with the primary outcome being leak post-esophagectomy. Univariate analyses were performed for demographics and post-operative outcomes, and multivariate analyses were performed specifically for the primary outcome of anastomotic leak (all diagnoses and malignancy/dysplasia subgroup). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.
Results: Of 4165 patients, 439 (10.5%) had a BMI > 35. Patients with BMI > 35 were often younger (mean age 60 vs 64 years, p < 0.001), White (p < 0.001), female (p < 0.001), non-smoker (p < 0.001), diabetic (p < 0.001), with hypertension (p < 0.001), and ASA ≥ 3 (p < 0.001). There were no differences between BMI groups with regard to indication for esophagectomy (malignancy/dysphasia vs other), conversion to open, mortality, or length of stay. The BMI > 35 cohort reported higher operative times (p < 0.001), open operative approach (p = 0.04), superficial surgical site infection (p < 0.001), return to operating room (p = 0.01), and leak (13.5% vs 10.1%, p = 0.01). BMI > 35 was not an independent predictor of leak for all diagnoses; however, the subgroup analysis of esophagectomy for malignancy/dysplasia demonstrated that BMI > 35 was predictive of leak (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.05-1.91), as well as operative time and hypertension.
Conclusion: Patients with a BMI > 35 and who undergo esophagectomy have a higher rate of anastomotic leak. BMI > 35 was also an independent predictor of leak when esophagectomy was performed for malignancy/dysplasia, but not for all diagnoses. The risk of anastomotic leak should be considered in morbidly obese patients undergoing esophagectomy, particularly for malignancy.
(© 2023. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)
References: American Cancer Society. Esophageal Cancer: Statistics. 2021, Available from: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/esophageal-cancer/statistics . Accessed 2/1/2021.
Schlottmann, F., N.H. Dreifuss, and M.G. Patti, Obesity and esophageal cancer: GERD, Barrett s esophagus, and molecular carcinogenic pathways. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020. 14(6): p. 425-433. (PMID: 10.1080/17474124.2020.176434832441160)
Abbas, G. and M. Krasna, Overview of esophageal cancer. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2017. 6(2): p. 131-136. (PMID: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.03284470015387155)
Alexandre, L., E. Long, and I.L. Beales, Pathophysiological mechanisms linking obesity and esophageal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol, 2014. 5(4): p. 534-49. (PMID: 10.4291/wjgp.v5.i4.534254009974231518)
Global Burden of Disease Cancer, C., et al., Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol, 2019. 5(12): p. 1749-1768.
Nguyen, N.T., et al., Evaluation of intra-abdominal pressure after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. Obes Surg, 2001. 11(1): p. 40-5. (PMID: 10.1381/09608920132145409711361167)
Kilic, A., et al., Impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009. 87(2): p. 412-5. (PMID: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.10.07219161748)
Amabile, A., R. Carr, and D. Molena, Esophagectomy for cancer in the obese patient. Annals of Esophagus, 2020. 3.
Kayani, B., et al., Does obesity affect outcomes in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer? A meta-analysis. World J Surg, 2012. 36(8): p. 1785-95. (PMID: 10.1007/s00268-012-1582-422526035)
Schweigert, M., et al., Treatment of intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks by means of endoscopic stent implantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2011. 12(2): p. 147-51. (PMID: 10.1510/icvts.2010.24786621106566)
Casas, M.A., et al., Surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2022. 48(3): p. 473-481. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.11934955315)
Kuppusamy, M.K., D.E. Low, and G. International Esodata Study, Evaluation of International Contemporary Operative Outcomes and Management Trends Associated With Esophagectomy: A 4-Year Study of >6000 Patients Using ECCG Definitions and the Online Esodata Database. Ann Surg, 2022. 275(3): p. 515-525.
Wang, P., et al., Predictive Value of Body Mass Index for Short-Term Outcomes of Patients with Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019. 26(7): p. 2090-2103. (PMID: 10.1245/s10434-019-07331-w30937663)
Greenlee, H., et al., Helping Patients Eat Better During and Beyond Cancer Treatment: Continued Nutrition Management Throughout Care to Address Diet, Malnutrition, and Obesity in Cancer. The Cancer Journal, 2019. 25(5): p. 320-328. (PMID: 10.1097/PPO.000000000000040531567459)
Chapek, M.A. and R.G. Martindale, Nutrition in cancer therapy: Overview for the cancer patient. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2021. 45(S2): p. 33-40. (PMID: 10.1002/jpen.225934459006)
Tao, W. and J. Lagergren, Clinical management of obese patients with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2013. 10(9): p. 519-33. (PMID: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.12023856746)
Fris, R.J., Preoperative low energy diet diminishes liver size. Obes Surg, 2004. 14(9): p. 1165-70. (PMID: 10.1381/096089204238697715527628)
Scheib, S.A., et al., Laparoscopy in the morbidly obese: physiologic considerations and surgical techniques to optimize success. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014. 21(2): p. 182-95. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.00924100146)
Curet, M.J., Special problems in laparoscopic surgery. Previous abdominal surgery, obesity, and pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am, 2000. 80(4): p. 1093-110. (PMID: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70215-210987026)
Murray, K.S., et al., Modifier 22 on perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Can J Urol, 2014. 21(4): p. 7385-9. (PMID: 25171284)
Richman, J.H., S.C. Mears, and M.C. Ain, Is the 22 modifier worth it? Orthopedics, 2012. 35(8): p. e1256-9. (PMID: 10.3928/01477447-20120725-2922868615)
Bergin, P.F., et al., Modifier 22 for acetabular fractures in morbidly obese patients: does it affect reimbursement? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014. 472(11): p. 3370-4. (PMID: 10.1007/s11999-014-3639-1247777214182419)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Anastomotic leak; Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Morbid obesity
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230420 Date Completed: 20230811 Latest Revision: 20240213
رمز التحديث: 20240213
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05669-x
PMID: 37081219
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1873-4626
DOI:10.1007/s11605-023-05669-x