دورية أكاديمية
Image quality assessment of advanced reconstruction algorithm for point-of-care MRI scanner.
| العنوان: | Image quality assessment of advanced reconstruction algorithm for point-of-care MRI scanner. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Krupinski EA; Emory University, Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, United States., Harris D; Emory University, Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, United States., Arlinghaus LR; Hyperfine, Inc., Guilford, Connecticut, United States., Schlemper J; Hyperfine, Inc., Guilford, Connecticut, United States., Sofka M; Hyperfine, Inc., Guilford, Connecticut, United States. |
| المصدر: | Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) [J Med Imaging (Bellingham)] 2023 Feb; Vol. 10 (Suppl 1), pp. S11913. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 May 22. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101643461 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2329-4302 (Print) Linking ISSN: 23294302 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Bellingham, Wash. : Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
| مستخلص: | Purpose: Portable magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) has potential to rapidly acquire images at the patients' bedside to improve access in locations lacking MRI devices. The scanner under consideration has a magnetic field strength of 0.064 T, thus image-processing algorithms to improve image quality are required. Our study evaluated pMRI images produced using a deep learning (DL)-based advanced reconstruction scheme to improve image quality by reducing image blurring and noise to determine if diagnostic performance was similar to images acquired at 1.5 T. Approach: Six radiologists viewed 90 brain MRI cases (30 acute ischemic stroke (AIS), 30 hemorrhage, 30 no lesion) with T 1 , T 2 , and fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequences, once using standard of care (SOC) images (1.5 T) and once using pMRI DL-based advanced reconstruction images. Observers provided a diagnosis and decision confidence. Time to review each image was recorded. Results: Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve revealed overall no significant difference ( p = 0.0636 ) between pMRI and SOC images. Examining each abnormality, for acute ischemic stroke, there was a significant difference ( p = 0.0042 ) with SOC better than pMRI; but for hemorrhage, there was no significant difference ( p = 0.1950 ). There was no significant difference in viewing time for pMRI versus SOC ( p = 0.0766 ) or abnormality ( p = 0.3601 ). Conclusions: The deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction scheme to improve pMRI was successful for hemorrhage, but for acute ischemic stroke the scheme could still be improved. For neurocritical care especially in remote and/or resource poor locations, pMRI has significant clinical utility, although radiologists should be aware of limitations of low-field MRI devices in overall quality and take that into account when diagnosing. As an initial triage to aid in the decision of whether to transport or keep patients on site, pMRI images likely provide enough information. (© 2023 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).) |
| References: | Crit Care. 2022 Apr 30;26(1):119. (PMID: 35501837) Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 25;12(1):5119. (PMID: 34433813) Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jan;73(1):30-5. (PMID: 21258906) Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Jan;108(1):45-50. (PMID: 35788031) Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):67. (PMID: 34996970) Resuscitation. 2022 Jul;176:150-158. (PMID: 35562094) AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 May;43(5):670-674. (PMID: 35450856) JAMA Neurol. 2020 Sep 08;:. (PMID: 32897296) Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 10;12:760321. (PMID: 34956049) Radiology. 2022 Dec;305(3):666-671. (PMID: 35916678) Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45. (PMID: 3203132) Sci Adv. 2022 Apr 22;8(16):eabm3952. (PMID: 35442729) Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 19;12(11):. (PMID: 36428931) Crit Care Explor. 2020 Dec 21;2(12):e0306. (PMID: 33381764) AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):W177-80. (PMID: 17242225) J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Jan;3(1):011005. (PMID: 26870748) J Digit Imaging. 2012 Aug;25(4):520-6. (PMID: 22349990) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: observer performance; portable magnetic resonance imaging; viewing time |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20230524 Latest Revision: 20230525 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC10201274 |
| DOI: | 10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11913 |
| PMID: | 37223324 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
| تدمد: | 2329-4302 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11913 |