دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Clonal diploid and autopolyploid breeding strategies to harness heterosis: insights from stochastic simulation.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Clonal diploid and autopolyploid breeding strategies to harness heterosis: insights from stochastic simulation.
المؤلفون: Labroo MR; Excellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group of International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.; International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico., Endelman JB; Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA., Gemenet DC; Excellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group of International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.; International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico., Werner CR; Excellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group of International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico.; International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico., Gaynor RC; Bayer Crop Science, 700 Chesterfield Pkwy W., Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA., Covarrubias-Pazaran GE; Excellence in Breeding Platform, Consultative Group of International Agricultural Research, Texcoco, Mexico. g.covarrubias@irri.org.; International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico. g.covarrubias@irri.org.
المصدر: TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik [Theor Appl Genet] 2023 Jun 08; Vol. 136 (7), pp. 147. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 08.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 0145600 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-2242 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00405752 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Theor Appl Genet Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Berlin, New York, Springer
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Hybrid Vigor* , Diploidy*, Inbreeding ; Computer Simulation
مستخلص: Key Message: Reciprocal recurrent selection sometimes increases genetic gain per unit cost in clonal diploids with heterosis due to dominance, but it typically does not benefit autopolyploids. Breeding can change the dominance as well as additive genetic value of populations, thus utilizing heterosis. A common hybrid breeding strategy is reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS), in which parents of hybrids are typically recycled within pools based on general combining ability. However, the relative performances of RRS and other breeding strategies have not been thoroughly compared. RRS can have relatively increased costs and longer cycle lengths, but these are sometimes outweighed by its ability to harness heterosis due to dominance. Here, we used stochastic simulation to compare genetic gain per unit cost of RRS, terminal crossing, recurrent selection on breeding value, and recurrent selection on cross performance considering different amounts of population heterosis due to dominance, relative cycle lengths, time horizons, estimation methods, selection intensities, and ploidy levels. In diploids with phenotypic selection at high intensity, whether RRS was the optimal breeding strategy depended on the initial population heterosis. However, in diploids with rapid-cycling genomic selection at high intensity, RRS was the optimal breeding strategy after 50 years over almost all amounts of initial population heterosis under the study assumptions. Diploid RRS required more population heterosis to outperform other strategies as its relative cycle length increased and as selection intensity and time horizon decreased. The optimal strategy depended on selection intensity, a proxy for inbreeding rate. Use of diploid fully inbred parents vs. outbred parents with RRS typically did not affect genetic gain. In autopolyploids, RRS typically did not outperform one-pool strategies regardless of the initial population heterosis.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
References: Aighewi BA, Asiedu R, Maroya N, Balogun M (2015) Improved propagation methods to raise the productivity of yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.). Food Secur 7(4):823–834. (PMID: 10.1007/s12571-015-0481-6)
Alexander BC, Davis AS (2022) Perspective: scientific rigor or ritual? Statistical significance in pest management science. Pest Manag Sci 78(3):847–854. (PMID: 3459955010.1002/ps.6668)
Amadeu RR, Ferrão LFV, Oliveira IDB, Benevenuto J, Endelman JB, Munoz PR (2020) Impact of dominance effects on autotetraploid genomic prediction. Crop Sci 60(2):656–665. (PMID: 10.1002/csc2.20075)
Arnold B, Bomblies K, Wakeley J (2012) Extending coalescent theory to autotetraploids. Genetics 192(1):195–204. (PMID: 22714411343053610.1534/genetics.112.140582)
Bartlett MS, Haldane JBS (1934) The theory of inbreeding in autotetraploids. J Genet 29(2):175–180. (PMID: 10.1007/BF02982194)
Batte M, Nyine M, Uwimana B, Swennen R, Akech V, Brown A, Persson Hovmalm H, Geleta M, Ortiz R (2020) Significant progressive heterobeltiosis in banana crossbreeding. BMC Plant Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02667-y. (PMID: 10.1186/s12870-020-02667-y331090877590486)
Bever JD, Felber F (1992) The theoretical population genetics of autopolyploidy. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 8:185–185.
Ceballos H, Kawuki RS, Gracen VE, Yencho GC, Hershey CH (2015) Conventional breeding, marker-assisted selection, genomic selection and inbreeding in clonally propagated crops: a case study for cassava. Theor Appl Genet 128(9):1647–1667. (PMID: 26093610454078310.1007/s00122-015-2555-4)
Ceballos H, Rojanaridpiched C, Phumichai C, Becerra LA, Kittipadakul P, Iglesias C, Gracen VE (2020) Excellence in cassava breeding: perspectives for the future. Crop Breed Genet Genomics 2(2):e200008.
Chen GK, Marjoram P, Wall JD (2009) Fast and flexible simulation of DNA sequence data. Genome Res 19(1):136–142. (PMID: 19029539261296710.1101/gr.083634.108)
Comstock RE, Robinson HF, Harvey PH (1949) A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability.
Covarrubias-Pazaran G, Gebeyehu Z, Gemenet D, Werner C, Labroo M, Sirak S, Coaldrake P, Rabbi I, Kayondo SI, Parkes E, Kanju E, Debaene J (2021) Breeding schemes: what are they, how to formalize them, and how to improve them? Front Plant Sci 12:791859. (PMID: 3512641710.3389/fpls.2021.791859)
Cowling WA, Gaynor RC, Antolín R, Gorjanc G, Edwards SM, Powell O, Hickey JM (2020) In silico simulation of future hybrid performance to evaluate heterotic pool formation in a self-pollinating crop. Sci Rep 10(1):1–8. (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-020-61031-0)
Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P, Woolliams JA (2007) Inbreeding in genome wide selection. J Anim Breed Genet 124:369–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x18076474)
Darkwa K, Olasanmi B, Asiedu R, Asfaw A (2020) Review of empirical and emerging breeding methods and tools for yam (Dioscorea spp.) improvement: status and prospects. Plant Breed 139(3):474–497. (PMID: 10.1111/pbr.12783)
Diaz FC, Eyzaguirre R, David MC, Sevillano RB, Low JW, Grüneberg WJ (2021) Genetic diversity determined by agronomic traits and SSR markers in two South American orange-fleshed sweetpotato breeding populations with potential for population hybrid breeding. Crop Sci 62:83–99. (PMID: 10.1002/csc2.20636)
Duvick DN (2005) Genetic progress in yield of United States maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 50:193.
Duvick DN, Smith JSC, Cooper M (2004) Long-term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program. Plant Breed Rev 24:109–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650288.ch4. (PMID: 10.1002/9780470650288.ch4)
Endelman JB, Jannink JL (2012) Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix. G3: Genes| Genomes| Genetics 2(11):1405–1413. (PMID: 23173092348467110.1534/g3.112.004259)
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group, Essex.
Fernández J, Villanueva B, Toro MA (2021) Optimum mating designs for exploiting dominance in genomic selection schemes for aquaculture species. Genet Sel Evol 53(1):1–13. (PMID: 10.1186/s12711-021-00610-9)
Gallais A (2003) Quantitative genetics and breeding methods in autopolyploid plants, pp 1–516.
Gaynor RC (2021) Traits in AlphaSimR. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AlphaSimR/vignettes/traits.pdf.
Gaynor RC, Gorjanc G, Bentley AR, Ober ES, Howell P, Jackson R, Mackay IJ, Hickey JM (2017) A two-part strategy for using genomic selection to develop inbred lines. Crop Sci 57(5):2372–2386. (PMID: 10.2135/cropsci2016.09.0742)
Gaynor RC, Gorjanc G, Hickey JM (2018). Dominance in stochastic simulations of animal breeding programs. In: Proceedings of the 11th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, volume theory to application, vol 3, p 318.
Gaynor RC, Gorjanc G, Hickey JM (2021) AlphaSimR: an R package for breeding program simulations. G3 11(2):jkaa017. (PMID: 3370443010.1093/g3journal/jkaa017)
Groose RW, Talbert LE, Kojis WP, Bingham ET (1989) Progressive heterosis in autotetraploid alfalfa: studies using two types of inbreds. Crop Sci 29(5):1173–1177. (PMID: 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900050015x)
Hallauer AR, Carena MJ, Miranda Filho JD (2010) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding, vol 6. Springer, Berlin.
Hardy GH (1908) Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science 28(706):49–50. (PMID: 1777929110.1126/science.28.706.49)
Heffner EL, Lorenz AJ, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME (2010) Plant breeding with genomic selection: gain per unit time and cost. Crop Sci 50(5):1681–1690. (PMID: 10.2135/cropsci2009.11.0662)
Heslot N, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME (2015) Perspectives for genomic selection applications and research in plants. Crop Sci 55(1):1–12. (PMID: 10.2135/cropsci2014.03.0249)
Hidalgo AM, Bastiaansen JWM, Lopes MS, Calus MPL, De Koning DJ (2016) Accuracy of genomic prediction of purebreds for cross bred performance in pigs. J Anim Breed Genet 133(6):443–451. (PMID: 2708711310.1111/jbg.12214)
Jones DF (1917) Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2(5):466. (PMID: 17245892119372910.1093/genetics/2.5.466)
Kimura M, Crow JF (1963) On the maximum avoidance of inbreeding. Genet Res 4(3):399–415. (PMID: 10.1017/S0016672300003797)
Kinghorn BP, Hickey JM, Van Der Werf JHJ (2010) Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection for total genetic merit in crossbred individuals. In: Proceedings of the 9th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, (Leipzig: German Society for Animal Science), pp 1–6.
Labroo MR, Studer AJ, Rutkoski JE (2021) Heterosis and hybrid crop breeding: a multidisciplinary review. Front Genet 12:234. (PMID: 10.3389/fgene.2021.643761)
Lamkey KR, Edwards JW (1999) Quantitative genetics of heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. American Society of Agronomy Inc, Madison, pp 31–48. https://doi.org/10.2134/1999.geneticsandexploitation.c4. (PMID: 10.2134/1999.geneticsandexploitation.c4)
Lee EA, Tracy WF (2009) Modern maize breeding. In: Bennetzen JL, Hake S (eds) Handbook of maize. Springer, New York, pp 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77863-1_7. (PMID: 10.1007/978-0-387-77863-1_7)
Leroy G, Baumung R, Boettcher P, Scherf B, Hoffmann I (2016) Sustainability of crossbreeding in developing countries; definitely not like crossing a meadow…. Animal 10(2):262–273. (PMID: 2650310110.1017/S175173111500213X)
Lindhout P, de Vries M, ter Maat M, Ying S, Viquez-Zamora M, van Heusden S, Solynta TN (2018) Hybrid potato breeding for improved varieties. Achiev Sustain Cultiv Potatoes 1:99–122. (PMID: 10.19103/AS.2016.0016.04)
Longin CFH, Utz HF, Melchinger AE, Reif JC (2007) Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids: II. Optimum type and number of testers in two-stage selection for general combining ability. Theor Appl Genet 114(3):393–402. (PMID: 1718037910.1007/s00122-006-0422-z)
Longin CFH, Mühleisen J, Maurer HP, Zhang H, Gowda M, Reif JC (2012) Hybrid breeding in autogamous cereals. Theor Appl Genet 125(6):1087–1096. (PMID: 2291866210.1007/s00122-012-1967-7)
Longin CFH, Reif JC, Würschum T (2014) Long-term perspective of hybrid versus line breeding in wheat based on quantitative genetic theory. Theor Appl Genet 127:1635–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2325-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s00122-014-2325-824845124)
Longin CFH, Mi X, Würschum T (2015) Genomic selection in wheat: optimum allocation of test resources and comparison of breeding strategies for line and hybrid breeding. Theor Appl Genet 128(7):1297–1306. (PMID: 2587751910.1007/s00122-015-2505-1)
Lynch M (1991) The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45:622–629. https://doi.org/10.2307/2409915. (PMID: 10.2307/240991528568822)
Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits, vol 1. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 535–557.
Manna F, Martin G, Lenormand T (2011) Fitness landscapes: an alternative theory for the dominance of mutation. Genetics 189:923–937. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.132944. (PMID: 10.1534/genetics.111.132944218907443213354)
McKey D, Elias M, Pujol B, Duputié A (2010) The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants. New Phytol 186:318–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03210.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03210.x20202131)
Moghaddar N, Swan AA, van der Werf JH (2014) Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep. Genet Sel Evol 46(1):1–10. (PMID: 10.1186/s12711-014-0058-4)
Moeinizade S, Hu G, Wang L, Schnable PS (2019) Optimizing selection and mating in genomic selection with a look-ahead approach: an operations research framework. G3: Genes Genomes Genetics 9(7):2123–2133. (PMID: 31109922664389310.1534/g3.118.200842)
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Heisterkamp S, Van Willigen B, Maintainer R (2017) Package ‘nlme’. Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models, version, 3(1).
Pocrnic I, Gaynor C, Bančič J, Wolc A, Lubritz D, Gorjanc G (2022) Calibrating simulations of dominance variation in animal breeding: case study in layer chickens. In: 73rd EAAP annual meeting.
Powell JE, Visscher PM, Goddard ME (2010) Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies. Nat Rev Genet 11(11):800–805. (PMID: 2087732410.1038/nrg2865)
Powell O, Gaynor RC, Gorjanc G, Werner CR, Hickey JM (2020) A two-part strategy using genomic selection in hybrid crop breeding programs. bioRxiv.
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Rembe M, Zhao Y, Jiang Y, Reif JC (2019) Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection: an attractive tool to leverage hybrid wheat breeding. Theor Appl Genet 132:687–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3244-x. (PMID: 10.1007/s00122-018-3244-x30488192)
Sattler MC, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR (2016) The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta 243(2):281–296. (PMID: 2671556110.1007/s00425-015-2450-x)
Schnell FW (1961) On some aspects of reciprocal recurrent selection. Euphytica 10(1):24–30. (PMID: 10.1007/BF00037201)
Schnell FW (1965) Die Covarianz zwischen Verwandten in einer gen-orthogonalen Population. I. Allgemeine Theorie Biom J 7(1):1–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.19650070102. (PMID: 10.1002/bimj.19650070102)
Schnell FW (1982) A synoptic study of the methods and categories of plant breeding.
Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen THE (2012) Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding. Genet Sel Evol 44:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-44-27. (PMID: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-27228983243522025)
Swan AA, Kinghorn BP (1992) Evaluation and exploitation of crossbreeding in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 75(2):624–639. (PMID: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77800-X)
Technow F, Riedelsheimer C, Schrag TA, Melchinger AE (2012) Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects. Theor Appl Genet 125(6):1181–1194. (PMID: 2273344310.1007/s00122-012-1905-8)
Troyer AF, Wellin EJ (2009) Heterosis decreasing in hybrids: yield test inbreds. Crop Sci 49:1969–1976. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0170. (PMID: 10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0170)
VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91(11):4414–4423. (PMID: 1894614710.3168/jds.2007-0980)
Vitezica ZG, Varona L, Legarra A (2013) On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope. Genetics 195(4):1223–1230. (PMID: 24121775383226810.1534/genetics.113.155176)
Washburn JD, Birchler JA (2014) Polyploids as a “model system” for the study of heterosis. Plant Reprod 27(1):1–5. (PMID: 2420296010.1007/s00497-013-0237-4)
Washburn JD, McElfresh MJ, Birchler JA (2019) Progressive heterosis in genetically defined tetraploid maize. J Genet Genomics 46(8):389–396. (PMID: 3144413610.1016/j.jgg.2019.02.010)
Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA (2016) The ASA statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat 70(2):129–133. (PMID: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108)
Wei M, van der Werf JH (1994) Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information. Anim Sci 59(3):401–413. (PMID: 10.1017/S0003356100007923)
Weinberg W (1908) Uber den nachweis der vererbung beim menschen. Jh Ver Vaterl Naturk Wurttemb 64:369–382.
Weinberg W (1909) Über Vererbungsgesetze beim Menschen. Z Ind Abstamm Vererb 2(1):276–330.
Werner CR, Gaynor RC, Sargent DJ, Lillo A, Gorjanc G, Hickey JM (2023) Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops. Theor Appl Genet 136(4):74. (PMID: 369520131003642410.1007/s00122-023-04300-6)
whuber ( https://stats.stackexchange.com/users/919/whuber ). (2020). Estimating the intersection of two lines. Cross Validated. https://stats.stackexchange.com/q/15512.
Wickham H (2011) ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Comput Stat 3(2):180–185. (PMID: 10.1002/wics.147)
Wolfe MD, Chan AW, Kulakow P, Rabbi I, Jannink JL (2021) Genomic mating in outbred species: predicting cross usefulness with additive and total genetic covariance matrices. Genetics 219(3):iyab122. (PMID: 34740244857079410.1093/genetics/iyab122)
Woolliams JA, Berg P, Dagnachew BS, Meuwissen THE (2015) Genetic contributions and their optimization. J Anim Breed Genet 132:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12148. (PMID: 10.1111/jbg.1214825823835)
Wricke G, Weber E (2010) Quantitative genetics and selection in plant breeding. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
Wright S (1921) Systems of mating. II0 The effects of inbreeding on the genetic composition of a population. Genetics 6(2):124. (PMID: 17245959120050210.1093/genetics/6.2.124)
Xiang T, Christensen OF, Vitezica ZG, Legarra A (2016) Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs. Genet Sel Evol 48(1):1–14. (PMID: 10.1186/s12711-016-0271-4)
Yang J, Mezmouk S, Baumgarten A, Buckler ES, Guill KE, McMullen MD et al (2017) Incomplete dominance of deleterious alleles contributes substantially to trait variation and heterosis in maize. PLoS Genet 13:e1007019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007019. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007019289538915633198)
Yao H, Srivastava S, Swyers N, Han F, Doerge RW, Birchler JA (2020) Inbreeding depression in genotypically matched diploid and tetraploid maize. Front Genet 11:564928. (PMID: 33329701773425610.3389/fgene.2020.564928)
معلومات مُعتمدة: OPP1177070 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230608 Date Completed: 20230612 Latest Revision: 20230712
رمز التحديث: 20230712
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10250475
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-023-04377-z
PMID: 37291402
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1432-2242
DOI:10.1007/s00122-023-04377-z