دورية أكاديمية
Development of a Classification System for Live Surgical Feedback.
| العنوان: | Development of a Classification System for Live Surgical Feedback. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Wong EY; Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Chu TN; Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Ma R; Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Dalieh IS; Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Yang CH; Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Ramaswamy A; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York., Medina LG; Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Kocielnik R; Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena., Ladi-Seyedian SS; Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Shtulman A; Thinking Lab, Department of Psychology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, California., Cen SY; Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Goldenberg MG; Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles., Hung AJ; Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. |
| المصدر: | JAMA network open [JAMA Netw Open] 2023 Jun 01; Vol. 6 (6), pp. e2320702. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 01. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: American Medical Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101729235 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2574-3805 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 25743805 NLM ISO Abbreviation: JAMA Netw Open Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Chicago, IL : American Medical Association, [2018]- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Surgeons*/education , Specialties, Surgical*, Humans ; Feedback ; Reproducibility of Results ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local |
| مستخلص: | Importance: Live feedback in the operating room is essential in surgical training. Despite the role this feedback plays in developing surgical skills, an accepted methodology to characterize the salient features of feedback has not been defined. Objective: To quantify the intraoperative feedback provided to trainees during live surgical cases and propose a standardized deconstruction for feedback. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study using a mixed methods analysis, surgeons at a single academic tertiary care hospital were audio and video recorded in the operating room from April to October 2022. Urological residents, fellows, and faculty attending surgeons involved in robotic teaching cases during which trainees had active control of the robotic console for at least some portion of a surgery were eligible to voluntarily participate. Feedback was time stamped and transcribed verbatim. An iterative coding process was performed using recordings and transcript data until recurring themes emerged. Exposure: Feedback in audiovisual recorded surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the reliability and generalizability of a feedback classification system in characterizing surgical feedback. Secondary outcomes included assessing the utility of our system. Results: In 29 surgical procedures that were recorded and analyzed, 4 attending surgeons, 6 minimally invasive surgery fellows, and 5 residents (postgraduate years, 3-5) were involved. For the reliability of the system, 3 trained raters achieved moderate to substantial interrater reliability in coding cases using 5 types of triggers, 6 types of feedback, and 9 types of responses (prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted κ range: a 0.56 [95% CI, 0.45-0.68] minimum for triggers to a 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.00] maximum for feedback and responses). For the generalizability of the system, 6 types of surgical procedures and 3711 instances of feedback were analyzed and coded with types of triggers, feedback, and responses. Significant differences in triggers, feedback, and responses reflected surgeon experience level and surgical task being performed. For example, as a response, attending surgeons took over for safety concerns more often for fellows than residents (prevalence rate ratio [RR], 3.97 [95% CI, 3.12-4.82]; P = .002), and suturing involved more errors that triggered feedback than dissection (RR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.03-3.33]; P = .007). For the utility of the system, different combinations of trainer feedback had associations with rates of different trainee responses. For example, technical feedback with a visual component was associated with an increased rate of trainee behavioral change or verbal acknowledgment responses (RR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.03-1.20]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that identifying different types of triggers, feedback, and responses may be a feasible and reliable method for classifying surgical feedback across several robotic procedures. Outcomes suggest that a system that can be generalized across surgical specialties and for trainees of different experience levels may help galvanize novel surgical education strategies. |
| التعليقات: | Comment in: JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2320465. (PMID: 37378988) |
| References: | Neurosurgery. 2021 Mar 15;88(4):E345-E350. (PMID: 33471893) J Urol. 2022 Aug;208(2):414-424. (PMID: 35394359) Med Teach. 2005 Aug;27(5):470-2. (PMID: 16147804) Surgery. 2012 May;151(5):643-50. (PMID: 22244182) World J Urol. 2017 Jan;35(1):27-34. (PMID: 27106491) Med Teach. 2015;37(6):551-7. (PMID: 25511982) Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):205-12. (PMID: 25822691) JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 1;152(4):318-325. (PMID: 27973648) Fam Med. 2005 May;37(5):360-3. (PMID: 15883903) Med Educ. 2008 Feb;42(2):189-97. (PMID: 18230092) BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 15;5(6):e006759. (PMID: 26078305) Cogn Sci. 2016 Jul;40(5):1251-69. (PMID: 26369299) Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1560-6. (PMID: 17285367) Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 Oct 09;4(4):422-7. (PMID: 26904193) J Urol. 2017 May;197(5):1245-1250. (PMID: 27916711) Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Apr;18(2):109-15. (PMID: 19342524) Am J Surg. 2001 Apr;181(4):333-7. (PMID: 11438267) |
| معلومات مُعتمدة: | R01 CA251579 United States CA NCI NIH HHS; R01 CA273031 United States CA NCI NIH HHS |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20230628 Date Completed: 20230630 Latest Revision: 20230702 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC10308254 |
| DOI: | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20702 |
| PMID: | 37378981 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 2574-3805 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20702 |